Skip to main content
Log in

Callus formation from protoplasts of Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch and some factors influencing protoplast division

  • Orginal Research Papers
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Round wormwood (Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch) seeds were germinated on Murashige & Skoog (1962) medium without plant growth regulators. The hypocotyls of seedlings were sliced and cultured on M1 medium with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (9.05 μM) to induce callus. The induced calluses were subcultured on the same medium. Ten day old calluses were used to isolate protoplasts in an enzyme solution with 0.65 M mannitol. Protoplast yield strongly depended upon the state of callus cultures. Certain amount of hemicellulase could improve protoplast isolation. Purified protoplasts were cultured in modified Kao & Michayluk (1975) medium with 0.60 M mannitol as osmoticum, suggesting that protoplasts of A. sphaerocephala need a high initial osmolarity. Protoplasts generally divided evenly and the percentage of first division could reach 10%. Kinetin exhibited a positive effect on initial cell division. Furthermore, we studied the effect of protoplast density and vitamin C on sustained growth of protoplasts. After forty days, 1 mm calluses in diameter formed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CH:

casein hydrolysate

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

KM8P:

Kao & Michayluk (1975) protoplast medium

MS:

Murashige & Skoog (1962) medium

MES-2:

(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid

References

  • Al-Atabee JS & Power JB(1987) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Dimorphotheca and Rudbeckia. Plant Cell Rep. 6: 414–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks MS & Evans PK(1976) A comparison of the isolation and culture of mesophyll protoplasts from several Nicotiana species and their hybrids. Plant Sci. Lett. 7: 409–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsby TL, Yarrow SA & Shepard JF(1986) A rapid and efficient alternative procedure for the regeneration of plants from hypocotyl protoplasts of Brassica napus. Plant Cell Rep. 5: 101–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry SF, Lu DY, Pental D & Cocking EC (1982) Regeneration plants from protoplasts of Lactuca sativa L. Z. Pflanzenphysiol Bd 108s: 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Binding H, Nehls R, Kock R & Finger J (1981) Comparative studies on protoplast regeneration in herbaceous species of the Dicotyledoneae class. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 101s: 119–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao Kn & Michayluk MR (1975) Nutritional requirements for growth of Vicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at a very low population density in liquid media. Planta 126(2): 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S-Q & Cai Q-Q (1990) Callus formation from protoplasts and plant regeneration from tissue culture of Silybum marianum Gaerth. Acta Botanica Sinica 32(1): 19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomura K, Fukuei K & Nitta T (1983) Culture of protoplasts isolated from somatic embryos of carrot. Plant Sci. Lett. 29: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe L & Chupeau Y (1986) Isolation and culture of sunflower protoplasts: Factors influencing the viability of cell colonies derived from protoplasts. Plant Science 43: 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z-Q & Jia J-F (1995) Tissue culture and plant regeneration in Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 15(2): 100–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, ZQ., Jia, JF. Callus formation from protoplasts of Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch and some factors influencing protoplast division. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 44, 129–134 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048190

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048190

Key words

Navigation