Skip to main content
Log in

Transformation of homozygous diploid potato with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector system by adventitious shoot regeneration on leaf and stem segments

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transformed potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants were obtained from homozygous diploid potato by using a transformation procedure in combination with an adventitious shoot regeneration method. Leaf and stem explants were inoculated with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain which contained a binary vector (pVU 1011) carrying the neomycin phosphotransferase gene. Shoot regeneration most effectively on stem explants, occurred within six weeks directly from the explants without introducing a callus phase. A strong seasonal influence on transformation efficiencies was observed. Analysis of a number of randomly selected regenerated shoots for their ability to root and form shoots on kanamycin-containing medium shows that over 90% of the regenerated shoots obtained are transformed. In a number of shoots transformation was confirmed by a test for the presence and expression of the NPT-II gene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An G, Watson BD, Chiang CC: Transformation of tobacco, tomato, potato and Arabidopsis thaliana using a binary Ti vector system. Plant Physiol 81: 301–305 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baulcombe DC, Saunders GR, Bevan MW, Mayo MA, Harrison BD: Expression of biological active viral satellite RNA from the nuclear genome of transformed plants. Nature 321: 446–449 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bevan M: Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 8711–8721 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer HW, Roulland-Dussoix D: A complementation analysis of the restriction and modification of DNA in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 41: 459–472 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis BD, Mingioli ES: Mutants of Escherichia coli requiring methionine or vitamin B12. J Bact 60: 17–28 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB: A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19–21 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ditta G, Stanfield S, Corbin D, Helinski DR: Broad host range DNA cloning system for gram negative bacteria; construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium melilote. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 7374–7351 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. van den Elzen PJM, Townsend J, Lee KY, Bedbrook JR: A chimeric hygromycin resistance gene as a selectable marker in plant cells. Plant Mol Biol 5: 299–302 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B: A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132: 6–13 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Horsch RB: Genetic transformation in higher plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 4: 1–46 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frandsen NO: Die Plastidenzahl als Merkmal bei der Kartoffel. Theor Appl Genet 38: 153–167 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch RB: Transformation of Brassica napus with Agrobacterium tumefaciens based vectors. Plant Cell Rep 6: 321–324 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holmes DS, Quickly M: A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bactrial plasmids. Anal Biochem 114: 193–201 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hovenkamp-Hermelink JHM, Jacobsen E, Ponstein AS, Visser RGF, Vos-Scheperkeuter GH, Bijmolt EW, Vries JN de, Witholt B, Feenstra WJ: Isolation of an amylose-free starch mutant of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Theor Appl Genet 75: 217–221 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hovenkamp-hermelink JHM, Jacobsen E, Pijnacker LP, de Vries JN, Witholt B, Feenstra WJ: Cytological studies on adventitious shoots and minitubers of a monoploid potato clone. Euphytica (in press).

  16. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Wallroth M, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227: 1229–1231 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCormick, Niedermeyer J, Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch R, Fraley R: Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep 5: 81–84 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ondrej M, Matousek J, Vlasak J: Differentiation of transformed plants from tumors induced by Agrobacterium rubi ATCC 13335. J Plant Physiol 126: 397–407 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ooms G, Hooykaas PJJ, van Veen RJM, van Bellen P, Regensburg-Tuink TJG, Schilperoort RA: Octopine Tiplasmid deletion mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with emphasis on the right side of the T-region. Plasmid 7: 15–29 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ooms G, Karp A, Roberts J: From tumour to tuber: tumour cell characteristics and chromosome numbers of crow gall-derived tetraploid potato plants (Solanum tuberosum cv. Maris Bard). Theor Appl Genet 66: 169–172 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ooms G, Karp A, Burrell MM, Twell D, Roberts J: Genetic modification of potato development using Ri-TDNA. Theor Appl Genet 70: 440–446 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ooms G, Burrell MM, Karp A, Bevan MW, Hille J: Genetic transformation in two potato cultivars with T-DNA from disarmed Agrobacterium. Theor Appl Genet 73: 744–750 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pijnacker LP, Ferwerda MA: Giemsa C-banding of potato chromosomes. Can J Genet Cytol 26: 415–419 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reiss B, Sprengel R, Willi M, Schaller H: A new, sensitive method for qualitative and quantitative assay of the neomycin phosphotransferase in crude cell extracts. Gene 30: 211–218 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sheerman S, Bevan MW: A rapid tranformation method for Solanum tuberosum using binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vectors. Plant Cell Rep 7: 13–16 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spielman A, Simpson RB. T-DNA structure in transgenic tobacco plants with multiple independent integration sites Mol Gen Genet 205: 34–41 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stiekema WJ, Heidekamp F, Louwerse JD, Verhoeven HA, Dijkhuis P: Introduction of foreign genes into potato cultivars Bintje and Desiree using an Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector Plant Cell Rep 7: 47–50 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Visser RGF, Hoekstra R. van der Leij FR, Pijnacker LP, Witholt B, Feenstra WJ. In situ hybridization to somatic metaphase chromosomes of potato. Theor Appl Genet 76: 420–424 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  31. White DWR, Greenwood D: Transformation of the forage legume Trifolium repens L. using binary Agrobacterium vectors. Plant Mol Biol 8: 461–469 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Willmitzer L, Sanchez-Serrano J, Buschfeld E, Schell J: DNA from Agrobacterium rhizogenes is transferred to and expressed in axenic hairy root plant tissues. Mol Gen Genet 186: 16–22 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, R.G.F., Jacobsen, E., Hesseling-Meinders, A. et al. Transformation of homozygous diploid potato with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector system by adventitious shoot regeneration on leaf and stem segments. Plant Mol Biol 12, 329–337 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043210

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043210

Key words

Navigation