Skip to main content
Log in

Studies of pollen grain germination, pollen tube growth, micropylar penetration and seed set in intraspecific and intergeneric crosses within three Cruciferae species

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pollen grain germination, pollen tube growth and micropylar penetration were investigated in intraspecific and intergeneric crosses involving Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera (Metzg.) Sinsk. (oil-seed rape or fodder rape), xBrassicoraphanus Sageret (Raparadish) and diploid (2x) and tetraploid (4x) accessions of Sinapis alba L.(white mustard). For the reciprocal intergeneric crosses between B. napus and xBrassicoraphanus no effective barriers to pollen tube growth on stigmata or in styles were observed. The resulting low frequency of hybrid plants was mainly associated with a low rate of ovules with micropylar penetration per siliqua or with embryo abortion. Hybrid plants could be obtained without use of embryo rescue. In reciprocal crosses between B. napus and S. alba 2x or 4x incongruity barriers were observed on the stigma, in the style, and in the ovary resulting in a low frequency of ovules with micropylar penetration per siliqua. Open flower-pollination compared to bud-pollination generally was the more favourable procedure for pollen grain germination and pollen tube growth in crosses involving S. alba, but for micropylar penetration and seed set no differences were observed. Crosses between S. alba 2x (♀) and B.napus (♂) were found to result in a higher frequency of ovules with micropylar penetration as compared to reciprocal crosses or crosses with S. alba 4x. All reciprocal crosses between B. napus and S. alba 2x or 4x were unsuccessful when no embryo rescue was applied. Embryo rescue shortly after pollination, i.e. 2 to 5 days, however, resulted in hybrid seeds and plants, but only when applied to crosses between S. alba 2x (♀) and B. napus (♂). The possible effects of the genome constitution, taxonomic distance and the parthenogenetic and parthenogenesis inducing ability of the parental genotypes on the observed malfunctions at the pre-and/or post-zygotic stage of the pollen grain-pistil interactions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DAP:

Days After Pollination

IAA:

Indole-3-Acetic Acid

kin:

Kinetin

References

  • AkbarM.A., 1989. Resynthesis of Brassica napus aiming for improved earliness and carried out by different approaches. Hereditas 111: 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrownA.P., J.Brown & A.FDyer, 1991. Optimal pollination conditions for seed set after a self-pollination, an intraspecific cross and an interspecific cross of marrow-stem kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala). Euphytica 51: 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chèvre, A.M., F. Eber, H. Brun, J. Plessis, C. Primard & M. Renard, 1991. Cytogenetic studies of Brassica napus-Sinapis alba hybrids from ovary culture and protoplast fusion. Attempts to introduce Alternaria resistance into rapeseed. Proc 8th International Rapeseed Conf., Saskatoon, Canada, pp. 346–351.

  • ChiangM.S., B.Y.Chiang & W.F.Grant, 1977. Transfer of resistance to race 2 of Plasmodiophora brassicae from Brassica napus to cabbage (B. oleracea var. ‘capitata’).I. Interspecific hybridization between B. napus and B. oleracea var. ‘capitata’. Euphytica 26: 319–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • DolstraO., 1982. Synthesis and fertility of xBrassicoraphanus and ways of transferring Raphanus characters to Brassica. Agric. Res. Rep. 917, Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • EeninkA.H., 1974a. Matromorphy in Brassica oleracea L. III. The influence of temperature, delayed prickle pollination and growth regulators on the number of matromorphic seeds formed. Euphytica 23: 711–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • EeninkA.H., 1974b. Matromorphy in Brassica oleracea L. II. Differences in parthenogenetic ability and parthenogenesis inducing ability. Euphytica 23: 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • EeninkA.H., 1975. Matromorphy in Brassica oleracea L. VI. Research on ovules, embryos and endosperms after prickle pollination. Euphytica 24: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • HåkanssonA., 1956. Seed development of Brassica oleracea and B. rapa after certain reciprocal pollinations. Hereditas 42: 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarberdD.J., 1969. A simple effective embryo culture technique for Brassica. Euphytica 18: 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • HeynF.W., 1977. Analysis of unreduced gametes in the Brassiceae by crosses between species and ploidy levels. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 78: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • HinataK., N.Konno & U.Mizushima, 1974. Interspecific crossability in the tribe Brassiceae with special reference to the selfincompatibility. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 25(2): 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • HogenboomN.G., 1973. A model for incongruity in intimate partner relationships. Euphytica 22: 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • JohnstonS.A., T.P.M.denNijs, S.J.Peloquin & R.E.HannemanJr., 1980. The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 57: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • KarpechenkoG.D., 1937. Reciprocal hybrids between Raphanobrassica and tetraploid cabbage. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. Pl. Breed. 7: 447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • KrohM., 1964. An electron microscopic study of the behaviour of Cruciferae pollen after pollination. In: H.F.Linskens (Ed.), Pollen physiology and fertilization, North Holland Publ. Comp. Amsterdam, pp. 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • LangeW., H.Toxopeus, J.H.Lubberts, O.Dolstra & J.L.Harrewijn, 1989. The development of Raparadish (xBrassicoraphanus, 2 n =38), a new crop in agriculture. Euphytica 40: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeliveltC.L.C. & F.A.Krens, 1992. Transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schm.) into the Brassica napus L. gene pool through intergeneric somatic hybridization with Raphanus sativus. L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 887–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeliveltC.L.C., E.H.M.Leunissen, H.J.Frederiks, J.P.F.G.Helsper & F.A.Krens, 1993a. Transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schm.) from Sinapis alba L. (white mustard) to the Brassica napus L. gene pool by means of sexual and somatic hybridization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 688–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelivelt, C.L.C., W. Lange & O. Dolstra, 1993b. Intergeneric crosses for the transfer of resistance to the beet cyst nematode from Raphanus sativus to Brassica napus. Euphytica (in press).

  • MurashigeT. & F.Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamatsu, U., N., T. & U. Mizushima, 1937. A report on meiosis in the two hybrids, Brassica alba Rabh. x B. oleracea L. and Eruca sativa Lam. x B. oleracea L. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 437–441.

  • NamaiH., 1980. Effect of flower bud age at bud pollination on cross fertility in reciprocal intergeneric crosses, Raphanus sativus x Brassica oleracea and B. campestris x R. sativus. Cruciferae Newsl. 5: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • NishiS., T.Kuriyama & T.Hiraoka, 1964. Studies on the breeding of crucifer vegetables by interspecific and intergeneric hybridization. 1. Special reference to the utilization of matroclinous hybrids accompanied with pseudogamous phenomena in those hybridizations. Bull. Hort. Res. Sta., Japan, Ser A 3: 163–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • NishiyamaI. & N.Inomata, 1966. Embryological studies on cross-incompatibility between 2x and 4x in Brassica. Japan J. Gen. 41(1): 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • NishiyamaI., M.Sarashima & Y.Matsuzawa, 1991. Critical discussion on abortive interspecific crosses in Brassica. Plant Breed. 107: 288–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • NoguchiY., 1928. Cytological studies on a case of pseudogamy in the genus Brassica. Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan 4: 617–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • OelkeJ., 1957. Zur Physiologie der Selbst-und Kreuzungssterilität beim Radieschen (Raphanus sativus L.). Der Züchter 27: 358–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • QuaziM.H., 1988. Interspecific hybrids between Brassica napus L. and B. oleracea L. developed by embryo culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • RöbbelenG., 1966. Beobachtungen bei interspezifischen Brassica-Kreuzungen, insbesondere über die Entstehung matromorpher F1-Pflanzen. Angew. Bot. 39: 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • SampsonD.R., 1962. Intergeneric pollen-stigma incompatibility in the Cruciferae. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 4: 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • TuressonG. & H.Nordenskiöld, 1943. Chromosome doubling and cross combinations in some cruciferous plants. Annals of the Agricultural College of Sweden, vol. 11: 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • VaughanJ.G. & K.E.Denford, 1968. An acrylamide gel electrophoretic study of the seed proteins of Brassica and Sinapis species, with special reference to their taxonomic value. J. Exp. Bot. 19: 724–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • VonWangenheimK.-H.F., 1955. Zur Ursache der Kreuzungsschwierigkeiten zwischen Solanum tuberosum L. und S. acaule Bitt. bzw. S. stoloniferum Schlechtd. et Bouché. Z. Planzenzüchtg. 34: 7–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • WatkinsA.E., 1932. Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. J. Gennet. 25: 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZenktelerM., 1990. In vitro fertilization of ovules of some species of Brassicaceae. Pl Breed. 105: 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lelivelt, C.L.C. Studies of pollen grain germination, pollen tube growth, micropylar penetration and seed set in intraspecific and intergeneric crosses within three Cruciferae species. Euphytica 67, 185–197 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040620

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040620

Key words

Navigation