Abstract
In the sagebrush/bunchgrass steppe of the North American Great Basin soil water potential has been shown to exhibit diel fluctuations with water potential increasing during the night as a result of water loss from roots in relatively dry soil layers. We hypothesized that environmental conditions promoting low transpiration rates (shading, cloudiness) would cause a net increase in soil water potential as a result of reduced soil water depletion during the day and continuing water efflux from roots during the night. We examined the response of soil water potential to artificial shading in sagebrush/bunchgrass plantings and used a simple model to predict how soil water potential should respond to reduced transpiration. Field measurements of soil water potential indicated that shading reduced daytime soil water depletion, but that the magnitude of the soil water potential increase during the night was related to the magnitude of the soil water potential decline during the preceding day. As a result, shading had little net effect on soil water potential. This behavior was consistent with model results and appears to result from the fact that soil water depletion during the day is largely responsible for creating the water potential gradients that drive nocturnal recharge of the shallow soil layers. The overall effect of such behavior is to buffer the seasonal course of soil water depletion in the rooting zone against day-to-day fluctuations in evapotranspiration. Despite the buffered behavior of soil water potential change, reduced evapotranspiration during light summer rains, and resulting soil water redistribution in the rooting zone, may enhance plant water status to a greater extent that would be expected on the basis of the rainfall received.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker J M and vanBavel C H M 1986 Resistance of plant roots to water loss. Agron. J. 78, 641–644.
Baker J M and vanBavel C H M 1988 Water transfer through cotton plants connecting soil regions of differing water potential. Agron. J. 80, 993–997.
Breazeale E L and McGeorge W T 1953 Exudation pressure in roots of tomato plants under humid conditions. Soil Sci. 75, 293–298.
Caldwell M M and Richards J H 1986 Competing root systems: morphology and models of absorption. In On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Ed. T JGivnish. pp 251–273. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Caldwell M M and Richards J H 1989 Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 79, 1–5.
Caldwell M M, Richards J H and Beyschlag W 1991 Hydraulic lift: ecological implications of water efflux from roots. In Plant Root Growth. An Ecological Perspective. Ed. DAtkinson. pp 423–436. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Fernandez O A and Caldwell M M 1975 Phenology and dynamics of root growth of three cool semi-desert shrubs under field conditions. J. Ecol. 63, 703–714.
Hanks R J and Ashcroft G L 1980 Applied Soil Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 159 p.
Hansen E A and Dickson R E 1979 Water and mineral nutrient transfer between root systems of juvenile Populus. Forest Sci. 25, 247–252.
Hunt E R and Nobel P S 1987a Non-steady state water flow for three desert perennials with different capacitances. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 14, 363–375.
Hunt E R and Nobel P S 1987b A two-dimensional model for water uptake by desert succulents: implications of root distribution. Ann. Bot. 59, 559–569.
Hunt E R, Zaker N J D and Nobel P S 1987 Water costs and water revenues for established and rain-induced roots of Agave deserti. Funct. Ecol. 1, 125–129.
Jensen R D, Taylor S A and Wiebe H H 1961 Negative transport and resistance to water flow through plants. Plant Physiol. 63, 633–638.
Lascano R J and vanBavel C H M 1984 Root water uptake and soil water distribution: test of an availability concept. Agron. J. 48, 233–237.
Molz F J and Peterson C M 1976 Water transport from roots to soil. Agron. J. 68, 901–904.
Nobel P S and Cui M 1992 Hydraulic conductances of the soil, the root-soil air gap, and the root: changes for desert succulents in drying soils. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 319–326.
Nobel P S and Sanderson J 1984 Rectifier-like activities of roots of two desert succulents. J. Exp. Bot. 35, 727–737.
North G B and Nobel P S 1991 Changes in hydraulic conductivity and anatomy caused by drying and rewetting roots of Agave deserti (Agavaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78, 906–915.
Richards J H and Caldwell M M 1987 Hydraulic lift: substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia (Berlin) 73, 486–489.
Richards L A and Neal O R 1936 Some field observations with tensiometers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1, 71–91.
Rosene H F 1944 Control of water transport in local root regions of attached and isolated roots by means of the osmotic pressure of the external solution. Am. J. Bot. 28, 402–410.
Thorgeirsson H 1985 Temporal and spatial partitioning of the soil water resource between two Agropyron bunchgrasses and Artemisia tridentata. Ms thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
VanBavel C H M and Ahmed J 1976 Dynamic simulation of water depletion in the root zone. Ecol. Modell. 2, 189–212.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, K., Caldwell, M.M. & Richards, J.H. The influence of shade and clouds on soil water potential: The buffered behavior of hydraulic lift. Plant Soil 157, 83–95 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038751
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038751