Summary
In vitro selection of salt tolerant plants of Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard) cv. Prakash has been accomplished by screening highly morphogenic cotyledon explant cultures on high NaCl media. Out of a total of 2,620 cotyledons cultured on high salt medium, 3 survived, showed sustained growth and regenerated shoots. They were multiplied by axillary bud culture on NaCl free medium. The salt-selected shoots retained salt tolerance following 3 month of growth and multiplication on control medium. While two of these somaclones flowered and set seeds, third one grew slowly, had abnormal leaf morphology and was sterile. The seed of the two fertile plants were sown in the field to raise R1 segregating generation. Data were recorded for field, other agronomic components and oil content. The somaclonal lines, both selected salt-tolerant and non-selected, showed tremendous amount of variation for all the characters studied. One of the two tolerant somaclones invariably showed reduced height, longer reproductive phase and higher 1000 seed weight. Based on the agronomic performance of R1 plants of these somaclones, some plants were selected and their progeny were evaluated for agronomic performance under standard field conditions and salt-tolerance in the greenhouse using sand pot culture method. Most of the lines bred true for their specific characteristics. In the greenhouse, selected salt-tolerant somaclones (SR-2 and SR-3) performed better for plant growth, yield and other agronomic traits at higher salt treatments, indicating thereby that salt-tolerance trait selected in vitro was expressed in the whole plants and is genetically stable and transmitted onto the progeny. The two tolerant lines, however, differed in their salt-tolerance during vegetative and reproductive phases as indicated by their salt-tolerance and stress susceptibility indices. The mechanism of salt-tolerance is not clear and needs to be further investigated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, G.H., 1969. Inheritance of the capacity of chloride inclusion and chloride exclusion by soybeans. Crop Sci. 9: 697–698.
Arnold, D.I. & D.R. Hogland, 1940. Crop production in artificial solutions with special reference to factors affecting yield and absorption of inorganic nutrients. Soil Sci. 50: 463–484.
Bhaskaran, S., R.H. Smith & K.F. Schertz, 1986. Progeny screening of sorghum plants regenerated from sodium chloride selected callus for salt tolerence. J. Plant Physiol. 112: 205–210.
Bruckner, P.L. & R.C. Frohberg, 1987. Stress tolerance and adaptation in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 27: 31–36.
Dix, P.J., 1986. Cell line selection. In: M.M. Yeomann, (Ed.). Plant Cell Culture Technology, pp. 143–201. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford.
Dix, P.J., U.A. McLysaght & A. Plunkett, 1986. Salt stress: resistance mechanisms and in vitro selection procedures. In: L.A. Withers & P.G. Alderson, (Eds.). Plant tissue culture and its Agricultural Applications, pp. 469–478. Butterworths, London.
Greenway, H. & R. Munns, 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol 31: 149–190.
Gupta, S.K., K. Dhawan & T.P. Yadav, 1985. Estimation of oil content by wide-line NMR. Oil Crops Newsletter. 2: 17–21.
Jain, R.K., D.R. Sharma & J.B. Chowdhury, 1986. Selection of NaCl-tolerant plants from cultured cotyledons of Brassica juncea. Eucarpia Cruciferae Newsletter 11: 96–97.
Jain, R.K., D.R. Sharma & J.B. Chowdhurry, 1989. High frequency regeneration and heritable somaclonal variation in Brassica juncea. Euphytica 40: 75–81.
McCoy, T.J., 1987. Characterization of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants regenerated from selected NaCl tolerant cell lines. Plant Cell Reports 6: 417–422.
McHugen, A., 1987. Salt tolerance through increased vigor in a flax line (STS-II) selected for salt tolerance in vitro. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 727–732.
Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 15: 473–497.
Nabors, M.W., S.E. Gibbs, C.S. Bernstein & M.E. Meis, 1980. NaCl tolerant tobacco plants from cultured cells. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 97: 13–17.
Norlyn, J.D., 1980. Breeding salt-tolerant plants. In: D.W. Rains, R.C. Valentine & A. Hollaender, (Eds.). Genetic engineering of osmoregulation; impact on plant productivity for food, chemicals and energy. pp. 293–309, Plenum Publ., New York.
Raghava-Ram, N.V. & M.W. Nabors, 1985. Salinity tolerance. In: P.N. Cheremisinoff & R.P. Oulette, (Eds.). Biotechnology: applications and research, pp. 623–642. Technomic Publ., Lanc., USA.
Rains, D.W., 1979. Salt tolerance of plants: strategies of biological systems. In: A. Hollaender, (Ed.). The biosaline concept: an approach to utilization of saline environments. pp. 47–67. Plenum Publ., New York.
Reddy, P.J. & K. Vaidyanath, 1982. Note on salt tolerance of some rice varieties of Andhra Pradesh during germination and early seedling growth. Ind. J. Agri. Sci. 52: 472–474.
Reisch, B. & E.T. Bingham, 1981. Plants from ethionine resistant alfalfa tissue cultures: variation in growth and morphological characteristics. Crop Sci. 21: 783–788.
Stavarek, S.J. & D.W. Rains, 1984. The development of tolerance to mineral stress. HortScience 19: 377–382.
Stewart, G.R. & J.A. Lee, 1974. The role of proline accumulation in halophytes. Planta 120: 279–289.
Storey, R. & R.G. Wyn-Jones, 1975. Betaine and choline levels in plants and their relationships to NaCl stress. Plant Sci. Lett. 4: 161–168.
Yano, S., M. Ogawa & Y. Yamada, 1982. Plant formation from selected rice cells resistant to salts. In: A. Fujiwara, (Eds). Proceeding of the 5th International Congress of Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Tokyo 1982, pp. 495–496. Maruzen Co., Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jain, R.K., Jain, S., Nainawatee, H.S. et al. Salt-tolerance in Brassica juncea L. I. In vitro selection, agronomic evaluation and genetic stability. Euphytica 48, 141–152 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037193
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037193