Summary
The utility of the modal grade as an alternative to the mean grade in the pre-selection test for screening seedlings of Coffea arabica L. for resistance to coffee berry disease (CBD) caused by Colletotrichum coffeanum NOACK sensu HINDORF was examined. Three criteria were used to compare the sensitivity of the modal grade with that of the mean grade when partitioning 6 weeks old seedlings into different resistance classes. The criteria were: the sensitivity of the two statistics as estimators of central tendency, the sensitivity of the modal grade and the mean grade as selection criteria and the correlation between the two statistics.
The modal grade was neither more sensitive in detecting genotypes that fell in diffent resistance classes nor more severe than the mean grade in screening for genotypes susceptible to CBD. In the cases studied, the modal grad was highly correlated with the mean grade (rs ranged from 0.55**–0.82**). Hence, it is concluded that there are practically no gains in adopting the modal grade as a pre-selection criterion in preference to the mean grade.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradley, R.A. & D.E.W. Schumann, 1957. The comparison of sensitivities of similar experiments: applications. Biometrics 13: 496–510.
Dancer, J., 1986. The evaluation of Arabica coffee cultivars for resistance to coffee berry disease: some comments. Euphytica 35: 125–228.
Schumann, D.E.W. & R.A. Bradley, 1959. The comparison of the sensitivities of similar experiments: Model II of the analysis of variance. Biometrics 15: 405–416.
Siegel, S., 1956. Non-parametric statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, pp. 312.
Van der Graaff, N.A., 1982. The principles of scaling and the inheritance of resistance to coffee berry disease in Coffea arabica. Euphytica 31: 735–740.
Van der Vossen, H.A.M., R.T.A. Cook & G.N.W. Murakaru, 1976. Breeding for resistance to coffee berry disease caused by Colletotrichum coffeanum (Noack sensu Hinddorf) in pre-selection for resistance. Euphytica 25: 733–745.
Van der Vossen, H.A.M. & D.J. Walyaro, 1980. Breeding for resistance to coffee berry disease in Coffea arabica L. II. Inheritance of the resistance. Euphytica 29: 777–791.
Van der Vossen, H.A.M. & D.J. Walyaro, 1981. A review of progress made since 1971 and plan of action for the coming years. Kenya Coffee 46: 113–129.
Zar, J.H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd Ed. Practice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs., New Jersey, pp. 718.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Owuor, J.B.O., Agwanda, C.O. Comparison of the sensitivity of the mean and the mode in screening coffee seedlings for resistance to coffee berry disease Colletotrichum coffeanum Noack sensu Hindorf (A short communication). Euphytica 45, 247–250 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032993
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032993