Skip to main content
Log in

Large scale yielding in blister specimens

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlinear von Karman plate theory was used for a consistent analysis of pressurized circular, island and peninsula blister specimens. The configurations that were considered ranged from linear plates to membranes. Interfacial energy release rates and fracture mode-mixes were extracted from the solutions. For a given pressure and all possible materials and delamination length to thickness (aspect, a/h) ratios, the peninsula blister provided the highest energy release rate, followed by the island and circular blisters. The extent of yielding in delaminating copper films with a range of thicknesses and an interfacial toughness of 100 J/m2 was then examined. It was found that all configurations of the circular blister suffered from large scale yielding. The stress levels in the island blister were notably lower, especially for a/h=10, where yielding only occurred over about 10 percent of the delaminating copper layer. While extensive yielding was still present in peninsula blister configurations with a/h=100 and 500, there was none for a/h=10. A scheme for extending the utility of blister specimens to higher aspect ratios was suggested and analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Dannenberg, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 5 (1961) 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.L. Williams, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 13 (1969) 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.L. Williams, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 14 (1970) 1121–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.D. Burton, W.B. Jones and M.L. Williams, Transactions, Society of Rheology 15 (1970) 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.P. Anderson, K.L. DeVries and M.L. Williams, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 47 (1974) 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G.P. Anderson, K.L. DeVries and M.L. Williams, International Journal of Fracture 10 (1974) 565–583.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S.J. Bennett, K.L. DeVries and M.L. Williams, International Journal of Fracture 10 (1974) 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Takashi, K. Yamazaki, T. Natsume and T. Takebe, 21st Japan Congress on Materials Research-Non-Metallic Materials (1978) 260–264.

  9. M. Yamazaki and M. Takashi, 21st Japan Congress on Materials Research-Non-Metallic Materials (1978) 255–259.

  10. F. Erdogan and K. Arin, International Journal of Engineering Science 10 (1972) 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K.M. Liechti, Experimental Mechanics 25 (1985) 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.A. Hinkley, Journal of Adhesion 16 (1983) 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.N. Gent and L.H. Lewandowski, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 33 (1987) 1567–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M.G. Allen and S.D. Senturia, Journal of Adhesion 25 (1988) 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.G. Allen and S.D. Senturia, Journal of Adhesion 25 (1989) 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y.-H. Lai and D.A. Dillard, Journal of Adhesion 31 (1990) 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.J. Neopolatino, A. Chudnovsky and A. Moet, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 2 (1988) 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.A. Dillard and Y. Bao, Journal of Adhesion 33 (1991) 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K.M. Liechti and Y.-M. Liang, International Journal of Fracture 55 (1992) 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K.-S. Kim and N. Aravas, International Journal of Solids and Structures 24 (1988) 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Kreiger, Theory of Plates and Shells, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill, New York (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H.M. Jensen, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 40 (1991) 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H.M. Jensen and M.D. Thouless, The Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Report #439 (1992).

  24. J.W. Hutchinson and Z. Suo, in Advances in Applied Mechanics, J.W. Hutchinson (ed.) 29 (1992) 63–199.

  25. K.M. Liechti and E. Hanson, International Journal of Fracture 36 (1988) 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H.C. Cao and A.G. Evans, Mechanics of Materials 7 (1989) 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J.-S. Wang and Z. Suo, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 38 (1990) 1279–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K.M. Liechti and Y.-S. Chai, Journal of Applied Mechanics 59 (1992) 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N.P. O'Dowd, M.G. Stout and C.F. Shih, Philosophical Magazine, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liechti, K.M., Shirani, A. Large scale yielding in blister specimens. Int J Fract 67, 21–36 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032362

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032362

Keywords

Navigation