Skip to main content
Log in

Resistance of sunflower inbred lines to various forms of attack by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and relations with some morphological characters

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Twenty sunflower inbred lines were studied for their reactions to 7 Sclerotinia sclerotiorum tests on different plant parts. A principal component analysis (P.C.A.) and t-tests on the means of resistant and susceptible groups indicated that reactions of inbred lines to infection of capitula by ascospores are independent from those to ascospore infections of terminal buds. They are even more contrasted with the results of any test measuring mycelial extension. However, for the last, there is a close association between the reactions of roots, leaves and capitula. Of the inbred lines, some showed good levels of resistance to most forms of attack, others were generally susceptible and there were some with good resistance to one particular form of attack. A P.C.A. of 18 morphological and field characters showed no general association between these characters and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum test results, although it was found that lines resistant to mycelial extension on capitula were generally earlier than those that were more susceptible. It is proposed that breeding programmes for general resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum should include a combination of two or three tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazzalo M., P.Dimarco, F.Martínez & G.Daleo, 1991. Indicators of resistance of sunflower plant to basal stalk rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum): symptomatological, biochemical, anatomical and morphological characters of the host. Euphytica 57: 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaño R., F.Vear & D.Tourvieille, 1989. L'utilisation de plusieurs tests simultanés dans la sélection pour la résistance du tournesol vis-à-vis de Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Inf. Tech. Cetiom 107: 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaño F., M.C.Hémery-Tardin, D. TourvieilledeLabrouhe & F.Vear, 1992. The inheritance and biochemistry of resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum leaf infections in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica 58: 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulya, T., 1985. Evaluation of sunflower germplasm for resistance to Sclerotinia stalk rot and race 3 Downy Mildew. In: Proceedings, 11th International Sunflower Conference, 10–13/03/85, Mar del Plata, Argentina, II: 349–352.

  • Hémery-Tardin, M.C., 1992. Recherche de marqueurs biochimiques de la résistance du tournesol à Sclerotinia spp. Doctoral Thesis, Blaise Pascal Univ., Clermont Fd., France, 106 p.

  • Kesteloot, J., P. Leclercq & H. Serieys, 1978. Recherches contribuant à la détermination des éléments permettant la différentiation entre hybrides à haut et bas rendement dans le tournesol (Helianthus annuus). In: Proceedings, 8th International Sunflower Conference, 23–27/07/78, Minneapolis, USA, 343–347.

  • Lebart L. & J.Fenelon, 1973. Statistique et informatique appliquées. 2nd Ed., Dunod, Paris, France, 457 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes R. & J.Hancock, 1981. Role of oxalic acid in Sclerotinia wilt of sunflower. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 18: 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Péres, J. & Y. Regnault, 1985. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary: Recherche de moyens chimiques permettant de limiter la production d'inoculum par traitement du sol. In: Proceedings, 11th International Sunflower Conference, 10–13/03/82, Mar del Plata, Argentina, II: 363–368.

  • Philippeau G., 1986. Comment interpréter les résultats d'une analyse en composantes principales? (Ed.) ITCF, Paris, France, 63 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirvu N., A.Vranceanu & F.Stoenescu, 1985. Genetic mechanisms of sunflower resistance to white rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Lin. de By.). Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 95: 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert N., F.Vear & D.Tourvieille, 1987. L'hérédité de la résistance au Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary chez le tournesol. I. Etude des réactions à deux tests mycéliens. Agronomie 7: 423–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuault M. & D.Tourvieille, 1988. Etude du pouvoir pathogène de huit isolats de Sclerotinia appartenant aux espèces Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Sclerotinia minor et Sclerotinia trifoliorum sur tournesol. Inf. Tech. Cetiom 103: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourvieille D. & F.Vear, 1984. Comparaison de méthodes d'estimation de la résistance au Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lin.) de Bary. Agronomie 4: 517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourvielle D. & F.Vear, 1990. Heredity of resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in sunflowers. III. Study of reactions to artificial infections of roots and cotyledons. Agronomie, 10: 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourvieille, D., F. Vear & El H. Achbani, 1992. Attack of sunflower terminal buds by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum symptoms and resistance. In: Proceedings, 13th International Sunflower Conference, 8–10/09/92, Pisa, Italy, 859–864.

  • Vear F. & D.Tourvieille, 1988. Heredity of resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in sunflowers. II. Study of capitulum resistance to natural and artificial ascospore infections. Agronomie 8: 503–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vear F. & J.Guillaumin, 1977. Etude des méthodes d'inoculation du tournesol par Sclerotinia sclerotiorum et application à la sélection. Ann. Amél. Plantes 27: 523–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, D. & J. Hoes, 1978. Diseases. In: J. Carter (Ed.) Sunflower Science and Technology, Am. Soc. of Agron., Agronomy 19, Madison, USA, 225–262.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castaño, F., Vear, F. & de Labrouhe, D.T. Resistance of sunflower inbred lines to various forms of attack by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and relations with some morphological characters. Euphytica 68, 85–98 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024158

Key words

Navigation