Skip to main content
Log in

Testing inoculation methods and sources of resistance to the halo blight bacterium (Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola) in Phaseolus vulgaris

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparative test of six inoculation methods was conducted using 2 halo blight race 2 virulent strains, Nebr. HB 16 and HB 21 (Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola), on five dry bean cultivars/lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of known resistance and susceptibility. The water-soaking of leaves method caused the most severe reaction among the leaf inoculation methods, followed by the carborundum, spraying and multiple needle methods, respectively. The seed soaking method was considered too severe to be useful, since entries identified as resistant by the other methods, were susceptible with the former method. Great Northern Nebraska # 1 sel. 27 and PI 150414 had the highest level of leaf resistance, but the former developed systemic chlorosis with the stem stabbing method, but not the latter line. No systemic chlorosis was seen in either line with the other methods of inoculation. This suggests that there may be a different genetic mechanism conferring resistance/susceptibility to the toxin in these two lines when the stabbing method is used. No interaction occurred between method by genotype and isolate by method but significant interactions occurred between genotype by isolate and method by isolate by genotype. The leaf and pod reaction of forty cultivars/lines to the new halo blight Nebr. Charlevoix strain was also determined. Different combinations of degrees of resistance and susceptibility of leaves and pods were observed. GN Tara, GN Harris, and PI 150414 had the highest combination of leaf and pod resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrus, C. F., 1948. A method of testing beans for resistance to bacterial blights. Phytopathology 38: 757–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arp, G., D. P.Coyne & M. L.Schuster, 1971. Disease reaction of bean varieties to Xanthomonas phaseoli and Xanthomonas phaseoli var. fuscans using two inoculation methods. Plant Dis. Reptr. 55: 577–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, E. T., 1946. Breeding for halo blight resistance in beans. M.S. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder, W. H., 1930. The bacterial diseases of the bean. A comparative study. Cornell Univ. Agr. Expt. Sta. Memoir 127: 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, Clyde L., L. L.Dean & L.LaFerriere, 1967. Incidence of halo blight in Idaho. Plant Dis. Reptr. 51: 310–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, D. P. & M. L.Schuster, 1974. Breeding and genetic studies of tolerance to several bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) bacterial pathogens. Euphytica 23: 651–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, D. P. & M. L.Schuster, 1979. Bacterial diseases of legumes: Breeding and resistance, pp. 225–233. In: R. J.Summerfield & A. H.Bunting (Eds), Advances in legume science. Royal Botanical Garden, Kew, Surrey, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goth, R. W., 1966. The use of a partial vacuum to inoculate bean seed with pathogenic bacteria. Plant Dis. Reptr. 50: 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., D. P.Coyne & M. L.Schuster, 1972. Leaf. pod and systemic chlorosis reaction in Phaseolus vulgaris to halo blight controlled by different genes. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97: 494–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbeling, N., 1957. New aspects of breeding for disease resistance in beans. Euphytica 6: 111–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbeling, N., 1973. Field resistance in Phaseolus beans to Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Meded. Fakult. Landboww., Gent. 38: 1351–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. N. & J. C.Walker, 1965. Resistance in Phaseolus to halo blight in beans. Phytopathology 56: 681–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M. L., 1955. A method of testing resistance of beans to bacterial blights. Phytopathology 45: 519–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M. L. & D. P.Coyne, 1975. Genetic variation in bean bacterial pathogens. Euphytica 24: 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M. L. & D. P.Coyne, 1981. Biology, epidemiology, genetics and breeding for resistance to bacterial pathogens of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Hort. Reviews 3: 28–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M. L., D. P.Coyne & E. D.Kerr, 1966. Pathogenicity tests of Nebraska isolates of halo blight bacteria on legumes. Ann. Reptr. Bean Improv. Coop. 9: 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. F., 1980. Miscellaneous bacterial diseases, pp. 173–194. In: H. F.Schwartz & G. E.Galvez (Eds). Bean production problems. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), CALI, Colombia, South America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. & W. G.Cochran, 1981. Statistical methods. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaiter, Haytham, Z., 1982. Testing inoculation methods and sources of resistance to halo blight bacterium (Pseudomonas phaseolicola) in Phaseolus vulgaris. M. S. Thesis, Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, US. pp. 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaumeyer, W. J. & Thomas, H. R. 1957. A monographic study of bean diseases and methods for their control. U.S. Dept. of Agric. Tech. Bull. 868, pp. 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published as paper No. 7094, Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. Research was conducted under Project No. 20-036.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaiter, H.Z., Coyne, D.P. Testing inoculation methods and sources of resistance to the halo blight bacterium (Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola) in Phaseolus vulgaris . Euphytica 33, 133–141 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022759

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022759

Index words

Navigation