Skip to main content
Log in

Variation within and among Ladino white clover ecotypes for agronomic traits

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

One set of 285 genotypes from three landraces and one natural population and a second set of 165 genotypes from two landraces and one natural population were evaluated in separate trials. Variation among populations was mostly accounted for by the difference between landrace and natural population genotype groups, the former showing features related to higher seed yield and short-term aerial dry matter (DM) yield and to lower persistence, cold tolerance and protein content. Compared to variance among ecotypes, that within ecotypes was never lower and it was at least four-fold higher for important traits such as aerial and total (aerial plus stolon) DM yield, stolon density, production of seed heads and cold tolerance. Landraces and natural populations showed similar levels of intra-population variation for all traits except cold tolerance, for which landraces tended to somewhat greater variation. Trait associations were less definite at the genotype level than what previously found in terms of mean values of the ecotypes. This finding and the relatively high broad sense heritability which was observed for all components of DM and seed yield can support the breeding activity on this clover. The level of variation and of heritability found for protein content do not suggest the routine evaluation of this trait in breeding programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annicchiarico P., 1993. Variation for dry matter yield, seed yield and other agronomic traits in Ladino white clover landraces and natural populations. Euphytica 71: 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P., 1994. Produttività e distinguibilità di ecotipi e varietà di tipo ‘giganteum’, e caratteri utili per l'identificazione varietale in trifoglio bianco. Sementi Elette 40 (6): 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P. & E. Piano, 1994. Interference effects in white clover genotypes grown as pure stands and binary mixtures with different grass species and varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardo N., 1992. NIRS calibration for white clover. p. 104–106. In: R.A. Tylor (Ed.). Proc. Int. Diffuse Reflectance Conf. The Council for Near-Infrared Spectroscopy, Gaithersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon J.J., 1980. Intraspecific diversity in natural populations of Trifolium repens. J. Ecology 68: 717–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caradus J.R. & A.C. MacKay, 1990. Breeding for increased stolon branching and node density in white clover. p. 347–348. Proc. XVI Int. Grassl. Congr. The French Grassland Society, Nice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caradus J.R. & D.R. Woodfield, 1990. Estimates of heritability for, and relationships between, root and shoot characters in white clover. I. Replicated clonal material. Euphytica 46: 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caradus J.R., D.F. Chapman, A.C. MacKay & M.G. Lambert, 1990. Morphological variation among white clover (Trifolium repens L.) populations collected from a range of moist hill coutry habitats. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 33: 607–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgersma A., G.D. Winkelhorst & A.P.M.den Nijs, 1994. The relationship between progeny seed yield in drilled plots and maternal spaced-plant traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant Breeding 112: 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame J. & P. Newbould, 1986. Agronomy of white clover. Adv. Agron. 40: 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund R.J., R.C. Littell & P.C. Spector, 1986. SAS System for linear models. SAS Institute, Cary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson P.B., 1957. Effect of flowering on the persistence of white clover. Agron. J. 49: 213–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward M.D., 1983. Selection for yield in Lolium perenne L. Selection and performance under spaced plant conditions. Euphytica 32: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight W.E., 1953. Interrelationships of some morphological and physiological characteristics of Ladino clover. Agron. J. 45: 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris I.B., 1990. The inheritance of the cold induction response with respect to floral initiation in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Euphytica 47: 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piano, E. & P. Annicchiarico, 1995. Persistence of Ladino white clover ecotypes and its relationship with other agronomic traits. Grass Forage Sci. (in press).

  • Rhodes I., 1991. Progress in white clover breeding. p. 1–9. In: White clover development in Europe. F.A.O., Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes I. & W. Harris, 1979. The nature and basis of differences in sward composition and yield in ryegrass—white clover mixtures. Brit. Grassl. Soc. Occ. Symp. 10: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes I. & K.J. Webb, 1993. Improvement of white clover. Outlook on Agric. 22: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronningen T.S., 1953. Susceptibility to winter injury and some other characteristics in Ladino and common white clovers. Agron. J. 45: 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotili P., 1975. Principaux aspects d'une méthode de sélection de la luzerne basée sur des dispositifs qui utilisent la concurrence entre les plantes. Ann. Amélior Plantes 25: 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe D.E. & G.E. Brink, 1993. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of white clover clones grown in three environments. Crop Sci. 33: 1149–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D., 1949. Differential survival of Ladino and common white clover encased in ice. Agron. J. 41: 230–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bockstaele E.J. & G. Rijckaert, 1988. Potential and actual seed yield of white clover varieties. Plant Varieties and Seeds 1: 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bogaert G., 1977. Factors affecting seed yield in white clover. Euphytica 26: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams W.M., 1983. Exploitation of genetic resource through breeding: Trifolium repens. p. 261–274. In: J.G. McIvor & R.A. Bray (Eds.) Genetic Resources of Forage Plants. CSIRO, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams W.M., 1987a. Adaptive variation. p. 299–321. In: M.J. Baker & W.M. Williams (Eds). White clover. C.A.B. International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams W.M., 1987b. Genetics and breeding. p. 343–419. In: M.J. Baker & W.M. Williams (Eds). White clover. C.A.B. International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield D.R. & J.R. Caradus, 1990. Estimates of heritability for, and relationships between, root and shoot characters of white clover II. Regression of progeny on mid-paren. Euphytica 46: 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield D.R. & J.R. Caradus, 1994. Genetic improvement in white clover representing six decades of plant breeding. Crop Sci. 34: 1205–1213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annicchiarico, P., Piano, E. Variation within and among Ladino white clover ecotypes for agronomic traits. Euphytica 86, 135–142 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022019

Key words

Navigation