Skip to main content
Log in

Pea genes associated with non-host disease resistance to Fusarium are also active in race-specific disease resistance to Pseudomonas

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A given plant species is able to resist most of the potentially pathogenic microorganisms with which it comes in contact. This phenomenon, known as non-host resistance, can be overcome only by a very small number of ‘true pathogens’ which can use that plant as a host. In some cases, plants have developed mechanisms for overcoming infection by specific races or strains of a true pathogen. This race-specific resistance can be easily manipulated into agronomically important cultivars by plant breeders. We have previously described nine cDNA clones which represent pea genes active during non-host resistance against the fungus Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli. In the present work, we have used these cDNAs as probes to compare non-host resistance with race-specific responses of peas against three races of Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. Five of the genes most active during non-host resistance were also active in direct correlation with the phenotypic expression of resistance in race-specific reactions of five differential pea cultivars against three races of Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EllistonJD, KucJ, WilliamsEB: Protection of Phaseolus vulgaris against anthracnose by Colletotrichum species non-pathogenic to bean. Phytopath Z 86: 117–126, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DalyJM: The role of recognition in plant disease. Ann Rev Phytopathol 22: 273–307, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. FlorHH: Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Ann Rev Phytopathol 9: 275–296, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FristenskyB, RigglemanRC, WagonerW, HadwigerLA: Gene expression in susceptible and disease resistant interactions of peas induced with Fusarium solani pathogens and chitosan. Physiol Plant Pathol 27: 15–28, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HadwigerLA, LoschkeDC. Molecular communication in host-parasite interactions: Hexosamine polymers (chitosan) as regulator compounds in race-specific and other interactions. Phytopathol 71: 756–762, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. HadwigerLA, WagonerW: Effect of heat shock on the mRNA-directed disease resistance response of peas. Plant Physiol 72: 553–556, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HadwigerLA, WagonerW: Electrophoretic patterns of pea and Fusarium solani proteins synthesized in vitro or in vivo which characterize the compatible and incompatible interactions. Physiol Plant Pathol 23: 153–162, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. HadwigerLA, WebsterDM: Resistance and phytoalexin production in five cultivars of peas differentially resistant to three races of Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. Phytopathol 74: 1312–1314, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. HeathMC: Reactions of non-suscepts to fungal pathogens. Ann Rev Phytopath 18: 211–236, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kraft JM, Burke DW, Haglund WA: Fusarium disease of beans, peas, and lentils. In: Nelson PE, Roussoun TA, Cook RJ (eds) Fusarium: Diseases, Biology and Taxonomy. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1981, pp 142–156.

  11. KucJ, RichmondS: Aspects of the protection of cucumber against Colletotrichum lagenarium by Colletotrichum lagenarium. Phytopathol 67: 533–536, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LegrandM: Phenylpropanoid metabolism and its regulation in disease. In: CallowJA (ed) Biochemical Plant Pathology. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. New York, 1983, pp 367–384.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LittlefieldLJ: Flax rust resistance induced by prior inoculation with an avirulent race of Melampsora lini. Phytopathol 59: 1323–1328, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  14. RigbyPWJ, DieckmannM, RhodesC, BergP: Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol 113: 237–251, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. RigglemanRC, FristenskyB, HadwigerLA: The disease resistance response in pea is associated with increased levels of specific mRNAs. Plant Mol Biol 4: 81–86, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. TaylorJD, VivianA, MalikA: Race structure in Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. In: ISPP Committee on Phytopathogenic Bacteria (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd Working Group on Pseudomonas syringae pathovars. The Hellenic Phytopathol. Soc., Athens, 1984, pp 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  17. WagonerW, LoschkeDC, HadwigerLA: Two-dimensional electrophoretic analysis of in vivo and in vitro synthesis of proteins in peas inoculated with compatible and incompatible Fusarium solani. Physiol Plant Pathol 20: 99–107, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. YarwoodCE: Some principles of plant pathology. II. Phytopathol 63: 1324–1325, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. YoshikawaM: Macromolecules, recognition and the triggering of resistance. In: CallowJA (ed) Biochemical Plant Pathology. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., New York, 1983, pp 267–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daniels, C.H., Fristensky, B., Wagoner, W. et al. Pea genes associated with non-host disease resistance to Fusarium are also active in race-specific disease resistance to Pseudomonas . Plant Mol Biol 8, 309–316 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021310

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021310

Keywords

Navigation