Skip to main content
Log in

Detrital feeding in natural zooplankton communities: Discrimination between live and dead algal foods

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freshwater zooplankton species differ in their consumption of live and dead algal cells when tested in situ. Using isotopically-labeled living and heat-killed Chlamydomonas reinhardti as models for phytoplankton and detrital seston, respectively, we tested differential feeding on these foods by 3 rotifers and 2 microcrustaceans. Keratella cochlearis selectively feeds on ‘detrital’ materials while 2 sympatric rotifer species, Conochilus dossuarius and Kellicottia bostoniensis show no ability to discriminate between the living and dead foods. Both the copepod Diaptomus spatulocrenatus and a cladoceran, Bosmina sp., differentially consume living cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bogdan, K. G., Gilbert, J. J. & Starkweather, P. L. 1980. In situ clearance rates of planktonic rotifers. In this volume, pp. 73–77.

  • Dumont, H. J. 1977. Biotic factors in the population dynamics of rotifers. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 8: 98–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T. 1957. Trophic relations of the zooplankton. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 76: 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, L. A. 1962. On the utilization of the reservoirs trophic resources by plankton rotifers. [in Russian]. Byull. Mosk. Obshch. Ispyt. Prir. 67: 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. & Williamson, C. E. 1978. Predator-prey behavior and its effect on rotifer survival in associations of Mesocyclops edax, Asplanchna girodi, Polyarthra vulgaris, and Keratella cochlearis. Oecologia 37: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. F. 1971. An in situ method for the measurement of zooplankton grazing rates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 970–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, E. 1923. Specielle Untersuchungen über die Ernährungsbiologie des tierischen Limnoplanktons. 11. Über den Nahrungsbiologie und die natürliche Nahrung der Copepoden und der Rotiferan des Limnoplanktons. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N. F. 2, 19: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauwerck, A. 1963. Die Beziehungen zwischen Zooplankton und Phytoplankton im See Erken. Symb. Bot. Upsal. 17: 1–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourriot, R. 1965. Recherches sur l'écologie des rotifères. Vie Milieu, Suppl. 21: 1–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourriot, R., 1977. Food and feeding habits of Rotifera. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 8: 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkweather, P. L. 1980. Aspects of the feeding behavior and trophic ecology of suspension-feeding rotifers. In this volume, pp. 63–72.

  • Starr, R. C. 1978. The culture collection of algae at the University of Texas at Austin. J. Phycol. 14 Suppl: 47–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spittler, P. 1969. Zucht- und Fütterungsversuche an einigen Rädertierarten der Hiddenseer Gewässer. Limnologica 7: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Starkweather, P.L., Bogdan, K.G. Detrital feeding in natural zooplankton communities: Discrimination between live and dead algal foods. Hydrobiologia 73, 83–85 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019430

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019430

Keywords

Navigation