Skip to main content
Log in

T-stress evaluations of mixed mode I/II fracture specimens and T-effects on mixed mode failure of aluminium

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By aid of Eshelby's theoretical development, and through the use of a direct line integration procedure for the evaluation of the required path-independent integrals. T-stress calculations have been carried out on a number of mixed mode loading configurations. These involved the obliquely cracked SEN specimen, chosen as a test case, and, from the testing point of view, more suitable Arcan specimen and a version of the CTS specimen. Generally excellent agreement was found between the present results and those of previous investigators. However, results obtained under mixed-mode conditions using direct comparison of field quantities showed large discrepancies, suggesting such methods may be hazardous. A study of the T-stress term in conjunction with mixed-mode failure of aluminium 7075-T6 was also conducted. In applying the numerical results on previously reported experimental data, along with complementary experiments performed under vanishing T-stress conditions it was, however, found that the observed geometry and size dependence could not be explained by this additional term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.G. Larsson and A.J. Carlsson, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 21 (1973) 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R.O. Ritchie, J.F. Knott and J.R. Rice, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 21 (1973) 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Hallbäck and F. Nilsson, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 42 (1994) 1345–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T.M. Maccagno and J.F. Knott, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 38 (1991) 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.W. Brown, K.J. Miller and T.J. Walker, in Materials Modelling and Inelastic Behaviour of Materials and Structures, Transactions of the 7th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (Vol. L), Chicago, Illinois, 22–26 August 1983, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Arcan, Hashin and A. Volodshin, Experimental Mechanics 18 (1978) 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C.E. Cardew, M.R. Goldthorpe, I.C. Howard and A.P. Kfouri, in Fundamentals of Deformation and Fracture, Proceedings of the Eshelby Memorial Symposium, B.A. Bilby, K.J. Miller and J.R. Willis (eds.) Sheffield 2–5 April 1984, Cambridge University Press (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.-L. Sham, International Journal of Fracture 48 (1991) 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P.S. Leevers and J.C. Radon, International Journal of Fracture 19 (1982) 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Z.Z. Du, C. Betegon and J.W. Hancock, International Journal of Fracture 52 (1990) 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.P. Kfouri, International Journal of Fracture 30 (1986) 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ABAQUS User's manual, version 5.2 (1992), Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc., Providence, RI.

  13. ADINA Theory and Modelling Guide, Report ARD 92–8 (1992), ADINA R&D, Inc., Watertown, MA.

  14. L.A. Carlsson and R.B. Pipes, Experimental Characterization of Advanced Composite Materials, Prentice-Hall, NJ (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N.P. O'Dowd and C.F. Shih, in 24th National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, June 30–July 2, 1992, Gatlinburg, Tennesse, ASTM STP, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.M. Maccagno and J.F. Knott, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 34 (1989) 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Erdogan and G.C. Sih, Journal of Basic Engineering 85 (1963) 519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Banks-Sills and Y. Bortman, International Journal of Fracture 30 (1986) 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.C.W. Davenport and D.J. Smith, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 16 (1993) 1125–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Yokobori, A.T. YokoboriJr, K. Sato and M. Omotani, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 17 (1983) 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J.G. Cowie and F.R. Tuler, International Journal of Fracture 47 (1991) 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.F. Knott, Metal Science 14 (1980) 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Aoki, K. Kishimoto, T. Yoshida, M. Sakata and H.A. Richard, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 38 (1990) 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T.M. Maccagno and J.F. Knott, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 41 (1992) 805–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D. Bhattacharjee and J.F. Knott, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 42 (1994) 1747–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L. Banks-Sills and D. Sherman, International Journal of Fracture 50 (1991) 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Aoki, K. Kishimoto, T. Yoshida and M. Sakata, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 35 (1987) 431–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A.K. Ghosal and R. Narasimhan, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 42 (1994) 953–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hallbäck, N., Jönsson, N. T-stress evaluations of mixed mode I/II fracture specimens and T-effects on mixed mode failure of aluminium. Int J Fract 76, 141–168 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018534

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018534

Navigation