Skip to main content
Log in

Cohesive cracks versus nonlocal models: Closing the gap

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracture of quasi-brittle materials, particularly concrete and cement-based material, has been treated in the past using a number of mildly related models. Hillerborg's fictitious crack model (also called cohesive crack model and Dugdale-Barenblatt model), Bažant's crack band model, and nonlocal models, are three of the most used for theoretical as well as for applied analysis. Using a uniaxial formulation and a Rankine-type model, the present work shows that the cohesive crack may be obtained as a particular case of a fully nonlocal formulation. The discussion of the generalization of the uniaxial formulation to triaxial behavior suggests that a directional averaging, rather than an isotropic one, may be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Hillerborg, M. Modéer and P.E. Petersson, Cement and Concrete Research 6(1976) 773–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Z.P. Bažant, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 102(2) (1976) 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Elices and J. Planas, in Fracture Mechanics of Concrete, From Theory To Application, L. Elfgren (ed.) Chapman and Hall, London (1989) 16–66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.G.B. Edelen, in Continuum Physics, vol. IV, Academic Press, New York (1972) 76–204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z.P. Bažant, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 110(12) (1984) 1693–1712.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z.P. Bažant, T.B. Belyschko and T.-P Chang, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 110(12) (1984) 1666–1692.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z.P. Bažant and G. Pijaudier-Cabot, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fracture mechanics (1987) 432–441.

  8. Z.P. Bažant and F.-B Lin, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 26 (1988) 1805–1823.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Pijaudier-Cabot and Z.P. Bažant, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 113 (1987) 1512–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.de Borst, H.-B. Mühlhaus and J. Pamin, in Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, Elsevier Applied Science, London (1992) 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.C. Simo, in Cracking and Damage, Elsevier Applied Science, London (1992) 440–461.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z.P. Bažant, Applied Mechanics Review, ASME 39(5) (1986) 675–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Hillerborg, Materials and Structures 18(106) (1985) 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Planas, J., Elices, M. & Guinea, G.V. Cohesive cracks versus nonlocal models: Closing the gap. Int J Fract 63, 173–187 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017284

Keywords

Navigation