Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of sulphur forms in soils from beech and spruce forests of Mont Lozère (France)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a quantitative inventory of sulphur forms and sulphur budget, the relation between the distribution of the various sulphur forms and the sulphate fluxes in three soil profiles has been addressed. These profiles are located in two forested watersheds at Mont Lozère. One has been sampled in a beech forest and the other two in a spruce forest and in a harvested plot of this spruce forest, respectively. The mean annual input-output budgets showed a sulphur immobilization in the soil cover of the three plots. In the preserved spruce forest plot, because of larger dry depositions, the sulphur immobilization is much greater than in other plots and occurs essentially in the B horizons. In the other two profiles, the dominant immobilization occurs in the parent material.

The total sulphur content is very high in the forest floor reaching 2065 μg S g-1 in the litter of one of the soils under spruce. In the organo-mineral horizons of soils under spruce, the total sulphur content decreases with depth and ranges from 310 to 520 μg S g-1 in the A horizons to 100–200 μg S g-1 in the parent material. In the profile under beech, the total sulphur content is lower except in the parent material. In all cases, the organic sulphur is the major part of sulphur often representing more than 90% of total sulphur. In organo-mineral soil horizons of the spruce forest, the part of the sulphateesters is more important than in the soil of the beech forest, probably related to the different nature of the microbial activity in the spruce forest. In contrast, the humification processes are more efficient in the soil under beech, which can be due to the greater input of organic sulphur by litterfall. It appears that the dominant organic sulphur form varies as a function of microbial ecology and sulphate flux. The maximum of the inorganic sulphate is located at the base of the B horizons in the soil of the spruce forest and in the parent material of the soil under beech. In these horizons, the high content of inorganic sulphate can be related to the higher amounts of amorphous Fe and Al phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beier C 1991 Separation of gaseous and particulate dry deposition of sulfur at a forest edge in Denmark. J. Environ. Qual. 20, 460–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettany J A, Stewart J W B and Saggar S 1979 The nature and forms of sulfur in organic matter fractions of soils selected along an environmental gradient. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 981–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederbeck V O 1978 Soil organic sulfur and fertility. In Soil Organic Matter. Eds. M Schnitzer and S U Kanh. pp 273–310. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S J 1987 Microbial sulphur in some Scottish soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David M B, Fasth W J and Vance G F 1991 Forest soil response to acid and salt additions of sulfate. I. Sulfur constituents and net retention. Soil Science 151, 136–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • David M B, Mitchell M J and Nakas J P 1982 Organic and inorganic constituents of a forest soil and their relationship to microbial activity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 847–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhamala B R, Mitchell M J and Stam A C 1990 Sulfur dynamics in mineral horizons of two northern hardwood soils. A column study with 35S. Biogeochemistry 10, 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand P 1989 Biogéochimie comparée de trois écosystèmes (pelouse, hêtraie, pessière) de moyenne montagne granitique (Mont Lozère, France). Thesis Universitéd'Orléans, 186 p.

  • Erkenberg A 1991 Schwefelausstattung Europäischer waldböden unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Adsorptionskapazitäten für Sulfat. Thesis, München Universität, 131 p.

  • Fitzgerald J W 1976 Sulfate ester formation and hydrolysis: a potentially important yet often ignored aspect of the sulfur cycle of aerobic soils. Bacteriol. Rev. 40, 698–721.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald J W, Strickland T C and Swank W T 1982 Metabolic fate of inorganic sulphate in soil samples from undisturbed and managed forest ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freney J R 1967 Sulfur-containing organics. In Soil Biochemistry, 1. Eds. A D MacLaren and G H Peterson. pp 220–259. Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freney J R 1986 Forms and reactions of organic sulfur compounds in soils. In Sulfur in Agriculture. Ed. M A Tabatabaï. pp 207–232. Agronomy 27, ASA-CSSA-SSSA.

  • Freney J R, Melville G E and Williams C H 1971 Organic sulphur fractions labelled by addition of 35S-sulphate to soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 3, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freney J R, Melville G E and Williams C H 1975 Soil organic matter fractions as sources of plant-available sulphur. Soil Biol. Biochem. 7, 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingston F J, Atkinson R J, Posner A M and Quirk J P 1967 Specific adsorption of anions. Nature 215, 1459–1461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C M and Nishita H 1952 Microestimation of sulphur in plant materials, soils and irrigation waters. Anal. Chem. 24, 736–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D W, Henderson G S, Huff D D, Lindberg S E, Richter D D, Shriner D S, Todd D E and Turner J 1982 Cycling of organic and inorganic sulphur in a chestnut oak forest. Oecologia 54, 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D W and Todd D E 1983 Relationships among iron, aluminum, carbon and sulfate in a variety of forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 792–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna P M, Prenzel J, Meiwes K J, Ulrich B and Matzner E 1987 Dynamics of sulfate retention by acid forest soils in an acidic deposition environment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 446–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurth F, Feger K H and Fischer M 1989 Sulfatadsorption-skapazität und Schwefelbindungsformen in Böden des Schwarzwaldes. Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau (DVWK) 17, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelong F, Dupraz C, Durand P and Didon-Lescot J F 1990 Effects of vegetation type on the biogeochemistry of small catchments (Mont Lozère, France). J. Hydrol. 116, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelong F, Durand P and Didon-Lescot J F 1988 Comparaison des bilans hydrochimiques, des taux d'altération et d'acidification dans trois petits bassins versants granitiques similaires à végétation contrastée (Mont Lozère, France). Sci. Géol., Bull. 41, 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelong F, Durand P, Vannier Ch, Guillet B and Rouiller J 1989 Importance de la rétention des ions sulfate dans des sols granitiques acides en région de moyenne montagne (Mont Lozère): relation générale avec le pouvoir tampon des sols. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 309, série II. 1991–1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg S E and Garten Jr. C T 1988 Sources of sulphur in forest canopy throughfall. Nature 336, 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe L E 1965 Sulphur fractions of selected Alberta soil profiles of the chernozemic and podzolic orders. Can. J. Soil Sci. 45, 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe L E and DeLong W A 1963 Carbon bonded sulfur in selected Quebec soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 43, 151–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald N W and Hart Jr. J B 1990 Relating sulfate adsorption to soil properties in Michigan forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaren R G, Keer J I and Swift R S 1985 Sulphur transformations in soils using sulphur-35 labelling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh K B, Tillman R W and Syers J K 1987 Charge relationships of sulfate sorption by soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 318–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard D G, Stewart J W B and Bettany J R 1985 The effect of plants on soil sulfur transformations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiwes K J, Khanna P K and Ulrich B 1980 Retention of sulphate by acid brown earth and its relationship with the atmospheric input of sulphur to forest vegetation. Z. Pflanzernaehr. Bodenkd. 143, 402–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J D, Anderson H A, Cooper J M, Ferrier R C and Stewart M 1991 Evidence for enhanced atmospheric sulphate interception by Sitka spruce from evaluation of source of Scottish catchments study data. Science Total Environ. 103, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M J, Driscoll C T, Fuller R D, David M B and Likens G E 1989 Effect of whole-tree harvesting on the sulfur dynamics of a forest soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 933–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nys C, Stevens P and Ranger J 1989 Sulphur nutrition of forests examined using a sulphur budget approach. In Nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Field methods application and interpretation. Eds. P Ineson and O W Hiel. pp 356–372. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler S C and Mitchell M J 1987 Dynamics of 35S in horizons and leachates from a hardwood forest spodosol. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 531–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler S C, Mitchell M J, Scott T J, Fuller R D and Driscoll C T 1986 Incorporation of 35S-sulfate into inorganic and organic constituents of two forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh B R, 1984 Sulfate sorption by acid forest soils: 3. Desorption of sulfate from adsorbed surfaces as a function of time, desorbing ion, pH and amount of adsorption. Soil Science 138, 346–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson F J 1982 Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley-Interscience, Wiley, New York. 443 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland T C and Fitzgerald J W 1984 Formation and mineralization of organic sulfur in forest soils. Biogeochemistry 1, 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland T C, Fitzgerald J W, Ash J T and Swank W T 1987 Organic sulfur transformations and sulfur pool sizes in soil and litter from a southern Appalachian hardwood forest. Soil Science 143, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland T C, Fitzgerald J W and Swank W T 1986 In situ mobilization of 35S-labelled organic sulphur in litter and soil from a hardwood forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 18, 463–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaï M A and Bremner J M 1970 An alkaline oxidation method for the determination of total sulfur in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannier Ch 1992 Les modalités de la rétention du soufre dans les sols de deux bassins versants forestiers du Mont Lozère. Thesis, Université d'Orléans, 113 p.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vannier, C., Didon-Lescot, J.F., Lelong, F. et al. Distribution of sulphur forms in soils from beech and spruce forests of Mont Lozère (France). Plant Soil 154, 197–209 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012525

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012525

Key words

Navigation