Skip to main content
Log in

Arguments for the use of physiological criteria for improving the salt tolerance in crops

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efforts to develop new crop varieties with improved salt tolerance have been intensified over the past 15–20 years. Despite the existence of genetic variation for salt tolerance within species, and many methods available for expanding the source of genetic variation, there is only a limited number of varieties that have been developed with improved tolerance. These new varieties have all been based upon selection for agronomic characters such as yield or survival in saline conditions. That is, based upon characters that integrate the various physiological mechanisms responsible for tolerance. Yet over the same time period, knowledge of physiological salt responses has increased substantially.

Selection and breeding to increase salt tolerance might be more successful if selection is based directly on the physiological mechanisms or characters conferring tolerance. Basic questions associated with using physiological selection criteria are discussed in the paper. These are centred around the need for genetic variation, the importance of the targeted mechanism, the ease of detection of the physiological mechanism (including the analytical requirements) and the breeding strategy. Many mechanisms, including ion exclusion, ion accumulation, compatible solute production and osmotic adjustment have been associated with genetic variation in salt tolerance. Yet their successful use in improving salt tolerance, via physiological selection criteria, is largely non-existent. Consideration is given to the role of physiological criteria in the short and long term in improving salt tolerance. In several glycophytic species, particularly legumes, physiological selection based on ion exclusion from the shoots shows promise. Recent results for white clover indicate the potential for using a broad physiological selection criterion of restricted Cl accumulation in the shoots, with scope for future refinement based upon the specific physiological characters that combined result in ion exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel G H 1969 Inheritance of the capacity for chloride inclusion and exclusion in soybeans. Crop Sci. 9, 697–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel G H and MacKenzie A J 1964 Salt tolerance of soybean varieties during germination and later growth. Crop Sci. 4, 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbar M and Yabuno T 1977 Breeding for salt-resistant varieties of rice. IV. Inheritance of delayed-type panicle sterility induced by salinity. Jpn. J. Breed. 27, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers A D, Wadleight G H and Bernstein L 1951 Salt tolerance of six varieties of lettuce. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 57, 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein L, Ehlig C F and Clark R A 1969 Effect of grape rootstocks on chloride accumulation in leaves. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 94, 584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J W and Hayward H E 1956 Salt tolerance of alfalfa varieties. Agron J. 48, 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram W J 1973 Chloride fluxes in cells of the isolated root cortex of Zea mays. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 26, 757–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper W C 1951 Salt Tolerance of Avocados on Various Rootstocks. Texas Avocado Soc. Yearbook 24–80, Weslaco, TX.

  • Cordukes W E 1981 Saltol, a salt tolerant red fescue. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61, 761–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day A D 1987 Registration of Arizona 8601 maize germplasm for saline environments. Crop Sci. 27, 1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey D R 1962 Breeding crested wheatgrass for salt tolerance. Crop Sci. 2, 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrenz A K, Schonhorst M H, Stone J E, Thompson R K, Allen S and Smith D 1983 AZ-Germ Salt-1 nondormant alfalfa germplasm. Crop Sci. 23, 807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas T J and Walker R R 1984 Phospholipids, free sterols and adenosine triphosphatase of plasma membrane-enriched preparations from roots of citrus genotypes differing in chloride exclusion ability. Physiol. Plant. 62, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downton W S 1977 Photosynthesis in salt-stressed grapevines. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 4, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dracup M 1991 Increasing salt tolerance of plants through cell culture requires greater understanding of tolerance mechanisms. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak J, Ross K and Mendlinger S 1985 Transfer of salt tolerance from Elytrigia pontica (Podp.) Holub to wheat by the addition of an incomplete Elytrigia genome. Crop Sci. 25, 306–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak J and Ross K 1986 Expression of tolerance of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl-, and SO4 2- ions and sea water in the amphiploid of Triticum aestivum × Elytrigia elongata. Crop Sci. 26, 658–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E 1985 Salt tolerant crops: Origins, development and prospects of the concept. Plant and Soil 89, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E, Norlyn J D, Rush D W, Kingsbury R W, Kelley D B, Cunningham G A and Wrona A F 1980 Saline culture of crops: A genetic approach. Science 210, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers T J and Yeo A R 1990 Ion relations of plants under drought and salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers T J and Yeo A R 1990 Salinity and rice: A physiological approach to breeding for resistance. In Proc. Int. Plant Physiol Congress. Eds. S K Sharma, P V Sabe, S C Bhargava and P K Agrawal. pp 953–959. Soc. Pl. Physiol Biochem., New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furr J R and Ream C L 1969 Breeding citrus rootstocks for salt tolerance. In Proceedings of 1st Int. Citrus Symposium, 1968. Ed. H D Chapman. Vol. 1, pp 373–380. University of California, Riverside, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gad El-hak M 1966 Breeding a new variety of rice adapted to recently reclaimed saline soils. Agric. Res. Rev. (Cairo) 44, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk W 1981 Mutation: Higher plants. Prog. Bot. 43, 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway H 1973 Salinity, plant growth and metabolism. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 39, 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway H and Munns R 1980 Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 149–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon N J and Bradshaw A D 1968 Evolution of salt tolerance in two coexisting species of grasses. Search 3, 259–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland D R and Arnon D I 1950 The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. No. 347.

  • Karmoker J L and VanSteveninck R F M 1978 Stimulation of volume flow and ion flux by abscisic acid in excised root systems of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Redland Pioneer. Planta 141, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin P J and Scowcroft W R 1981 Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läuchli A 1984 Salt exclusion: An adaptation of legumes for crops and pastures under saline conditions. In Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Strageiges for Crop Improvement. Eds R C Staples and G H Toenniessen. pp 171–187. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läuchli A and Epstein E 1990 Plant responses to saline and sodic conditions. In Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. Ed. K K Tanjii. pp 113–137. ASCE, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läuchli A and Wieneke J 1979 Studies on growth and distribution of Na, K and Cl in soybean varieties differing in salt tolerance. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 142, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessani H and Marschner H 1978 Relation between salt tolerance and long-distance transport of sodium and chloride in various crop species. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5, 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas E V and Hoffman G J 1977 Crop salt tolerance—current assessment. J. Irrig. Drainage Div. ASCE 103, 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H, Kylin A and Kuiper P J C 1981 Differences in salt tolerance of three sugar beet genotypes. Physiol. Plant. 51, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble C L 1983 The potential for breeding salt tolerant plants. Proc. Royal Soc. Vict. 95, 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble C L, Halloran G M and West D W 1984 Identification and selection for salt tolerance in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) Aust. J. Agric. Res. 35, 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble C L and Shannon M C 1988 Salt tolerance selection of forage legumes using physiological criteria. In Proc. Int. Plant Physiol Congress. Eds. S K Sharma, P V Sabe, S C Bhargava and P K Agrawal. pp 989–994. Soc. Pl. Physiol Biochem., New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norlyn J D 1980 Breeding salt tolerant crop plants. In Genetic Engineering of Osmoregulation. Eds. D W Rains, R C Valentine and A Hollaender. Basic Life Sci. 14, 293–309. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak D 1987 Salt tolerance and crop production—a comprehensive approach. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 25, 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramage R T 1980 Genetic methods to breed salt tolerance in plants. In Genetic Engineering of Osmoregulation. Eds. D W Rains, R.C. Valentine and A. Hollaender. Basic Life Sci. 14, 311–318.

  • Rush D W and Epstein E 1981a Breeding and selection for salt tolerance by the incorporation of wild germplasm into a domesticated tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 106, 669–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush D W and Epstein E 1981b Comparative studies on the sodium, potassium, and chloride relations of a wild halophytic and a domestic salt-senstive tomato species. Plant Physiol. 68, 1308–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salim M 1989 Salinity effects on growth and ionic relations of two Triticale varieties differing in salt tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 162, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon M C 1978 Testing salt tolerance variability among tall wheatgrass populations. Agron. J. 70, 719–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon M C 1985 Principles and strategies in breeding for higher salt tolerance. Plant and Soil 89, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon M C, McCreight J D and Draper J H 1983 Screening tests for salt tolerance in lettuce. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108, 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon M C and Noble C L 1990 Genetic approaches for developing economic salt-tolerant crops. In Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. Ed. K K Tanjii. pp 161–185. ASCE, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M K and McComb J A 1981 Effect of NaCl on the growth of whole plants and their corresponding callus cultures. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 8, 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes S R 1985a A glasshouse screening procedure for identifying citrus hybrids which restrict chloride accumulation in shoot tissues. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 36, 779–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes S R 1985b Variation in chloride accumulation by hybrid vines from crosses involving the cultivars Ramsay, Villard blanc and Sulatana. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal M 1985 Genetics of salt tolerance in higher plants, theoretical and practical considerations. Plant and Soil 89, 199–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal M and Shannon M C 1983 Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato, responses of Lycopersicon esculentum, L. cheesmanii, L. peruvianum, Solanum pennellii and F1 hybrids to high salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R M, Young E FJr and Rivera R L 1975 Salt tolerance in cultivars of grain sorghum. Crop Sci. 15, 734–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich A 1961 Variability of sugar beet plants grown in pots without competition for light, water and nutrients. J. Am. Soc. Sugar beet Technology. 11, 595–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables A V and Wilkins D A 1978 Salt tolerance in pasture grasses. New Phytol. 80, 613–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright S J 1980 Plants in relation to salinity. Adv Bot. Res. 8, 221–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter E and Lauchli A 1982 Salt Tolerance of Trifolium alexandrinum L. I. Comparison of the salt response of T. alexandrinum and T. pratense. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9, 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones R G and Gorham J 1980 Osmoregulation. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol 12C. Physiological Plant Ecology III. Eds. O L Lange, P S Nobel and C B Osmond. pp 35–58. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones R G and Storey R G 1981 Betaines. In The Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistance in Plants. Eds. L G Paleg and D Aspinall. pp 171–204. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo A R and Flowers T J 1983 Varietal differences in the toxicity of sodium ions in rice leaves. Physiol. Plant. 59, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo A R and Flowers T J 1986 Salinity resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soils. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noble, C.L., Rogers, M.E. Arguments for the use of physiological criteria for improving the salt tolerance in crops. Plant Soil 146, 99–107 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012001

Key words

Navigation