Abstract
Described are a method and apparatus that allowin situ measurement of predation on zooplankton byMysis relicta. The method, which can be generalized to other predators, involves lowering paired large-volume (30-1) plankton traps to the depth of interest, with subsequent trapping of the ambient zooplankton assemblage in each trap and release of predators into one of the traps. The statistical adequacy of the method was shown by error propagation theory to depend on the percentage of available prey consumed, on the number of prey captured by the traps, and on the distribution of zooplankton within the volume of water captured by the traps. Repeated casts of the apparatus showed that, in contrast to other studies of zooplankton distribution, various zooplankton categories were statistically underdispersed (evenly dispersed in space) or at least not more statistically dispersed (clumped) than was a random distribution at a space scale of 1 m. An error analysis of many replicated feeding experiments showed that the errors obtained were reasonably small and that they conformed with or were less than those predicted by error propagation theory that assumed random distribution of zooplankton. Thus, these results supported the practical application of the method and corroborated the conclusion of random dispersion or underdispersion drawn from the experiment of repeated casts of the apparatus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bevington, P. R., 1969. Data Reduction and Error Analyses for the Physical Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York. 336 pp.
Bowers, J. A. & Grossnickle, N. E., 1978. The herbivorous habits of Mysis relicta in Lake Michigan. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 767–776.
Bowers, J. A. & Vanderploeg, H. A., 1982. In situ predatory behavior of Mysis relicta in Lake Michigan. Hydrobiologia 93: 121–131.
Cassie, R. M., 1959. Micro-distribution of plankton. N.Z. J. Sci. 2: 398–409.
Cassie, R. M., 1971. Sampling and statistics. In: Edmondson, W. T. & Winberg, G. G. (Eds.) Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters, pp. 175–209. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
Cooper, S. D. & Goldman, C. R., 1980. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta) predation on zooplankton. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 909–919.
Frost, B. W., 1972. Effect of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 805–815.
Gauld, D. T., 1951. The grazing rate of planktonic copepods. J. mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 29: 695–706.
Gliwicz, Z. M., 1968. The use of anaesthetizing substance in studies of food habits of zooplankton communities. Ekol. Polska Series A, 16(13): 279–295.
Grossnickle, N. E., 1978. The herbivorous and predacious habits of Mysis relicta in Lake Michigan. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 107 pp.
Haney, J. F., 1971. An in situ method for the measurement of zooplankton grazing rates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 970–977.
Hutchinson, G. E., 1967. A Treatise on Limnology, Vol. 2. Wiley, New York. 1115 pp.
Ivlev, V. S., 1961. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. Yale University Press.
Kajak, Z. & Rybak, J., 1979. The feeding of Chaoborus flavicans Meigen (Diptora, Chaoboridae) and its predation on lake zooplankton. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 64: 361–378.
Langford, R. R., 1938. Diurnal and seasonal changes in the distribution of limnetic crustacea of Lake Nipissing, Ontario. Univ. Toronto Stud. Biol. Ser. No. 45 (Publs Ontario Fish. Lab. 56): 1–42.
Lauff, G. H., 1953. The design and application of a multiple sample plankton trap. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.
Murtaugh, P. A., 1981. Selective predation by Neomysis mercedis in Lake Washington. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 445–453.
Naber, H., 1933. Die Schichtung des zooplanktons in holstinischen Seen under Einfluss des zooplanktons auf den Sauerstoffgehalt der bowohnten Schichten. Arch. Hydrobiol. 25: 81–132.
Pastorok, R. A., 1980. The effects of predator hunger and food abundance on prey selection by Chaoborus larvae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25: 910–921.
Patalas, K., 1954. Comparative studies on a new type of self acting water sampler for plankton and hydrochemical investigations. Ekol. Polska 2: 231–242. (In Polish, English summary.)
Runge, J. A., 1980. Effects of hunger and season on feeding behavior of Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25: 134–145.
Rybock, J. T., 1978. Mysis relicta Loven in Lake Tahoe: vertical distribution and nocturnal predation. Ph.D. thesis, University of California-Davis. 116 pp.
Schindler, D. W., 1969. Two useful devices for vertical plankton and water sampling. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 1948–1955.
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G., 1967. Statistical Methods, 6th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. 593 pp.
Vanderploeg, H. A., 1981. Seasonal particle-size selection by Diaptomus sicilis in offshore Lake Michigan. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 38: 504–517.
Vanderploeg, H. A. & Scavia, D., 1979a. Calculation and use of selectivity coefficients of feeding: zooplankton grazing. Ecol. Modelling 7: 135–149.
Vanderploeg, H. A. & Scavia, D., 1979b. Two electivity indices for feeding with special reference to zooplankton grazing. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36: 362–365.
Windell, J. T., 1967. Rates of digestion in fishes. In: Gerking, S. D. (Ed.) The Biological Basis of Freshwater Fish Production, pp. 151–174. John Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanderploeg, H.A., Bowers, J.A., Chapelski, O. et al. Measuringin situ predation byMysis relicta and observations on underdispersed microdistributions of zooplankton. Hydrobiologia 93, 109–119 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008104
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008104