Skip to main content
Log in

Induction of fast-growing and morphologically different strains through intergeneric protoplast fusions of Ulva and Enteromorpha (Ulvales, Chlorophyta)

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isolated protoplasts of Ulva pertusa and Enteromorpha prolifera were electrically fused. Treatment of protoplasts in 1% protease for 15–20 min prior to fusion enhanced fusion ability. Protoplasts from each fusion partner were mixed together in 1:1 ratio in low conductivity electrofusion solution at a density of 1 × 105 cells ml−1 before subjecting them to electrofusion. The protoplasts were aligned in AC field (1MHz, 25 V for 10–15 s) and subsequently fused by a high intensity single DC pulse of 250 V for 25 μs duration. Fusion buffer supplemented with 1 mM calcium and 1 mM magnesium yielded optimum fusion frequencies (about 18–24%). Entrapment of fusion treated cells inside agarose/agar plate facilitated marking and regeneration of fusion products. The regeneration patterns of fused protoplasts were similar to normal (unfused) protoplast development. Most of the regenerated plants from fusion products had a thallus similar to either U. pertusa type or E. prolifera type. Although some of the plants of the former were morphologically similar to U. pertusa, but most had a higher growth rate (1.9 to 1.5 times) than U. pertusa. Furthermore the thallus of some plants had a characteristic irregular and dentate margin, which was never observed in the parental type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates GW, Saunders JA, Sowers AE (1987) Electrofusion: principles and applications. In Sowers AE (ed.), Cell Fusion. Plenum, New York, 367–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binding H (1974) Fusion experiments with isolated protoplasts of Petunia hybrida L. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 72: 422–426.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson PS, Smith HH, Dearing RD (1972) Parasexual interspecific plant hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 69: 2292–2294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Bravo JA, Kut SA, Flick CE (1983) Genetic behaviour of somatic hybrids in the genus Nicotiana: N. otophora and N. tabacum and N. sylvestris and N. tabacum. Theor. appl. Genet. 65: 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish N, Karp A, Jones MGK (1988) Production of somatic hybrids by electrofusion in Solanum. Theor. appl. Genet. 76: 260–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y, Migita S (1987) Fusion of protoplasts from thalli of two different color types in Porphyra yezoensis Ueda and development of fusion products. Jap. J. Phycol. 35: 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y, Saito M (1990) Protoplast isolation and fusion in Porphyra. Hydrobiologia 204/205: 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith DW (1984) Selection of somatic hybrid cells by fluorence-activated cell sorting. In Vasil IK (ed.), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, 433–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleba YY, Sytnik KM (1984) Protoplast fusion. Genetic Engineering in Higher Plants. In Frankel R (ed.), Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 8. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 220 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameya T (1979) Studies on plant cell fusion: effect of dextran and pronase E on fusion. Cytologia 44: 449–456.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN (1977) Chromosomal behaviour in somatic hybrids of Soybean-Nicotiana glauca. Mol. Gen. Genet. 150: 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn H, Schieder O (1985) Somatic hybrids in tobacco mediated by electrofusion. Plant. Sci. 38: 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence J Nea, Bates GW (1987) Factors affecting protoplast electrofusion efficiency. Plant Cell Rep. 6: 337–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucy JA (1984) Fusogenic mechanisms. In Everd J, Whelan J (eds), Cell Fusion. Ciba Foundation Symposium 103. Pitman, London 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers G, Labin G (1974) Somatic hybridization of plants by fusion of protoplasts. 1. Selection of light resistant hybrids of ‘haploid’ light sensitive varieties of tobacco. Mol. Gen. Genet. 135: 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata T (1978) A novel cell fusion method protoplasts by polyvinyl alcohol. Naturwissenschaften 65: 263–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migita S (1985) The sterile mutant of Ulva pertusa Kjellman from Omura bay. Bull. Fac. Fish. Nagasaki Univ. 57: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohiwa T (1975) Behaviour of cultured fusion products from Zygnema and Spirogyra protoplasts. Protoplasma 97: 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno-Shosaku T, Okada Y (1984) Facilitation of electrofusion of mouse lymphoma cells by the proteolytic action of protease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 120: 138–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primke M, Bergers S, Schweiger H (1978) Protoplasts from Acetabularia: isolation and fusion. Cytobiologie 16: 375–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy CRK, Fujita Y (1989) Protoplast isolation and fusion of Ulva pertusa and U. conglobata. In Miyachi S, Karube I, Ishida Y (eds), Current Topics in Marine Biotechnology. The Society of Marine Biotechnology, Tokyo, 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy CRK, Migita S, Fujita Y (1989) Protoplast isolation and regeneration of three species of Ulva in axenic culture. Bot. mar. 32: 483–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy CRK, Fujita Y (1991) Regeneration of plantlets from Enteromorpha (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) protoplasts in axenic culture. J. appl. Phycol. 3: 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saga N, Polne-Fuller M, Gibor A (1986) Protopolasts from seaweeds: production and fusion. Beih. Nova. Hedwegia 83: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito M, Fujita Y (1991) Optimization of fusion conditions in the polyethylene glycol and electric stimulation methods for the protoplasts of Porphyra. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57: 919–925.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senda M, Takeda J, Abe S, Nakamura T (1979) Induction of Cell Fusion of plant protoplasts by electrical stimulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 20: 1441–1445.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vienken J, Ganser R, Hampp R, Zimmermann U (1981) Electric field induced fusions of isolated vacuoles and protoplasts of different developmental and metabolic provenience. Physiol. Plant, 53: 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D (1983) Study on the protoplasts preparation, culture and fusion of somatic cells from two species of green algae — Ulva linza and Monostroma angicava Kjellm. J. Shandong Coll. Oceanology 13: 57–65 (in Chinese withe English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmezrmann U (1982) Electric field mediated fusion and related electrical phenomenon. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 694: 227–277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, C.R.K., Iima, M. & Fujita, Y. Induction of fast-growing and morphologically different strains through intergeneric protoplast fusions of Ulva and Enteromorpha (Ulvales, Chlorophyta). J Appl Phycol 4, 57–65 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003961

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003961

Key words

Navigation