Abstract
This paper proposes a hand exoskeleton system for evaluating hand functions. To evaluate hand functions, the hand exoskeleton system must be able to pull each finger joint, measure the finger joint angle and exerted force on the finger simultaneously. The proposed device uses serially connected 4-bar linkage structures, which have two embedded actuators with encoders and two loadcells per finger, to move each phalanx independently and measure the finger joint angles. A modular design was used for the exoskeleton, to facilitate the removal of unnecessary modules in different experiments and improve convenience. Silicon was used on the surface of the worn part to reduce the skin irritation that results from prolonged usage. This part was also designed to be compatible with various finger thicknesses. Using the proposed hand exoskeleton system, finger independence, multi-finger synergy, and finger joint stiffness were determined in five healthy subjects. The finger movement and force data collected in the experiments were used for analyzing three hand functions based on the physical and physiological phenomena.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Internet Stroke Center, Stroke Statistics, [2018-03], https://doi.org/doi.org/www.strokecenter.org/
Go A S, Mozaffarian D, Roger V L, Benjamin E J, Berry J D, Blaha M J, Fullerton H J. Heart disease and stroke statistics— 2014 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2014, 129, e28–e292.
O'Driscoll S W, Giori N J. Continuous passive motion (CPM): Theory and principles of clinical application. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2000, 37, 179.
Pand A D, Johnson G R, Price C I M, Curless R H, Barnes M P, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1999, 13, 373–383.
Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D, Grundmann K, Zange C, Koch R, Pohl M. Reliability of the modified tardieu scale and the modified ashworth scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: A comparison study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2005, 19, 751–759.
Zatsiorsky V M, Li Z M, Latash M L. Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production. Experimental Brain Research, 2000, 131, 187–195.
Campolo D, Widjaja F, Xu H, Ang W T, Burdet E. Analysis of accuracy in pointing with redundant hand-held tools: A geometric approach to the uncontrolled manifold method. PLOS Computational Biology, 2013, 9, e1002978.
Verrel J. Distributional properties and variance-stabilizing transformations for measures of uncontrolled manifold effects. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2010, 191, 166–170.
Latash M L, Anson J G. Synergies in health and disease: Relations to adaptive changes in motor coordination. Physical Therapy, 2006, 86, 1151–1160.
Scholz J P, Kang N, Patterson D, Latash M L. Uncontrolled manifold analysis of single trials during multi-finger force production by persons with and without Down syndrome. Experimental Brain Research, 2003, 153, 45–58.
Li Z M, Davis G, Gustafson N P, Goitz R J. A robot-assisted study of intrinsic muscle regulation on proximal interphalangeal joint stiffness by varying metacarpophalangeal joint position. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2006, 24, 407–415.
Littler J W. The finger extensor mechanism. Surgical Clinics of North America, 1967, 47, 415–432.
Esteki A, Mansour J M. An experimentally based nonlinear viscoelastic model of joint passive moment. Journal of Biomechanics, 1996, 29, 443–450.
Dionysian E, Kabo J M, Dorey F J, Meals R A. Proximal interphalangeal joint stiffness: Measurement and analysis. Journal of Hand Surgery, 2005, 30, 573–579.
Wright V, Johns R J. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of joint stiffness in normal subjects and in patients with connective tissue diseases. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1961, 20, 36.
Troncossi M, Mozaffari-Foumashi M, Parenti-Castelli V. An original classification of rehabilitation hand exoskeletons. Journal of Robotics and Mechanical Engineering Research, 2016, 1, 17–29.
Polygerinos P, Wang Z, Galloway K C, Wood R J, Walsh C J. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2015, 73, 135–143.
Kim S J, Kim Y, Lee H, Ghasemlou P, Kim J. Development of an MR-compatible hand exoskeleton that is capable of providing interactive robotic rehabilitation during fMRI imaging. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2018, 56, 261–272.
Conti R, Meli E, Ridolfi A, Bianchi M, Governi L, Volpe Y, Allotta B. Kinematic synthesis and testing of a new portable hand exoskeleton. Meccanica, 2017, 52, 2873–2897.
Randazzo L, Iturrate I, Perdikis S, Millán J D R. Mano: A wearable hand exoskeleton for activities of daily living and neurorehabilitation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3, 500–507.
Cempini M, Cortese M, Vitiello N. A Powered finger-thumb wearable hand exoskeleton with self-aligning joint axes. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20, 705–716.
Ho N S K, Tong K Y, Hu X L, Fung K L, Wei X J, Rong W, Susanto E A. An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: Task training system for stroke rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Zurich, Switzerland, 2011, 1–5.
Kim S, Lee J, Bae J. Analysis of finger muscular forces using a wearable hand exoskeleton system. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2017, 14, 680–691.
Tyromotion, AMADEO, [2018-03], https://doi.org/doi.org/tyromotion.com/en/products/amadeo
Boian R, Sharma A, Han C, Merians A, Burdea G, Adamovich S, Recce M, Tremaine M, Poizner H. Virtual realitybased post-stroke hand rehabilitation. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference, Newport Beach, USA, 2002, 64–70.
Raghavan P, Petra E, Krakauer J W, Gordon A M. Patterns of impairment in digit independence after subcortical stroke. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2006, 95, 369–378.
Lang C E, Schieber M H. Reduced muscle selectivity during individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2004, 91, 1722–1733.
Suarez-Escobar M, Gallego-Sanchez J A, Rendon-Velez E. Mechanisms for linkage-driven underactuated hand exoskeletons: Conceptual design including anatomical and mechanical specifications. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2017, 11, 55–75.
Rijpkema H, Girard M. Computer animation of knowledgebased human grasping. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics, 1991, 25, 339–348.
Sizekorea. Korean Normal Anthropometric Data, [2015-03], https://doi.org/doi.org/sizekorea.kats.go.kr/
Maxon Motor, [2018-03], https://doi.org/www.maxonmotor.com/
Kim S, Bae J. Force-mode control of rotary series elastic actuators in a lower extremity exoskeleton using model- inverse time delay control. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22, 1392–1400.
National Instrument, [2018-03], https://doi.org/www.ni.com/
OptiTrack, Prime 13, [2018-03], https://doi.org/optitrack.com/
Kang N, Shinohara M, Zatsiorsky V M, Latash M L. Learning multi-finger synergies: An uncontrolled manifold analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 2004, 157, 336–350.
Shim J K, Hsu J, Karol S, Hurley B F. Strength training increases training-specific multifinger coordination in humans. Motor Control, 2008, 12, 311–329.
Olafsdottir H, Zatsiorsky V M, Latash M L. Is the thumb a fifth finger? A study of digit interaction during force production tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 2005, 160, 203–213.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Translational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots (Grant No. NRCTR-EX16004), Korea National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Lee, M. & Bae, J. Development of a Hand Exoskeleton System for Quantitative Analysis of Hand Functions. J Bionic Eng 15, 783–794 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0066-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0066-0