Skip to main content
Log in

Political genderphobia in Europe: accounting for right-wing political-religious alliances against gender-sensitive education reforms since 2012

Politische Genderphobie in Europa: Ein Ansatz zur Erklärung religiös-rechts-radikaler Allianzen gegen Gender-sensible Politikreformen im Bildungsbereich.

  • Artikel
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the formation of alliances between religious and political right-wing actors against gender-sensitive policy reforms, specifically within the last five years. Given the Catholic origin of a discourse that considers the notion of gender, as a socio-cultural element of identity, a dangerous and totalitarian ideology, this paper elaborates the concept of political genderphobia in order to explain why these actors ally themselves to campaign against “gender”. Political genderphobia takes a supply-side approach that emphasises the relevance of ideological and strategic tenets shared by religious (here Christian) and political leaders—namely, their shared understanding of gender hierarchy, social inequality and cultural homogeneity, as well as their appropriation of certain populist strategies aimed at politicising the term “gender” as an elite invention and mobilising it as a fundamental threat to “the people”. In order to understand why political genderphobia has become a salient concept just within the past decade and accompanies the rise of the radical right, three demand-side factors are also discussed: the Europeanisation of anti-discrimination policies in the arena of education, individual risk perception fostered by the transformation of patriarchal structures, and the alleged or real alienation of liberal European elites from those who are not able or willing to share the egalitarian and freedom-based principles of the liberal project. This paper contributes to a question currently under discussion in various areas of research—anti-gender research, research on religion and morality politics, as well as research on the radical right—concerning the relevance of “gender” for illiberal politics.

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel befasst sich mit rechtsradikalen (diskursiven) Alllianzen, die sich insbesondere im Verlauf der letzten fünf Jahre zwischen religiösen und politischen Akteuren gegen geschlechtersensible Politikreformen formiert haben. Der Ursprung dieses Diskurses, der das Konzept von Gender als soziale Kategorie und Identitätsmerkmal als gefährliche und totalitäre Ideologie betrachtet, geht auf die Römisch-katholische Kirche zurück. Um zu erklären, weshalb auch rechtsradikale Akteure mit religiösen (v. a. Christlich affilierten) Akteuren gegen „Gender“ agieren, entwickelt der Artikel das Konzept der politischen Genderphobie; ein Supply-Side-Ansatz, der besonderes Augenmerk auf die Ähnlichkeiten ideologischer Aspekte richtet, die den liberalen Implikationen von Gender entgegenstehen. Ideologische und strategische Gemeinsamkeiten, die aus Perspektive der politischen Genderphobie als besonders relevant scheinen, sind ein ähnliches Verständnis von Geschlechterhierarchie und sozialer Ungleichheit (vs. Gleichheit), kultureller Homogenität (vs. Pluralität) und die populistische Strategie, Gender zu politisieren, indem der Begriff als Elitenprojekt und fundamentale Bedrohung „der Gesellschaft“ konstruiert wird. Um zu begründen, weshalb politische Genderphobie erst seit etwa einer Dekade so virulent ist und parallel zum Aufstieg der radikalen Rechten sichtbar wird, diskutiert der Artikel am Ende drei Demand-Side-Faktoren: Die Europäisierung von Anti-Diskriminierungspolitiken im schulischen Bildungsbereich, die subjektive Wahrnehmung von Unsicherheit auch bedingt durch die Wandlung patriarchaler Strukturen sowie die angebliche oder wirkliche Entfremdung liberaler Europäischer Eliten von jenen, die nicht in der Lage oder Willens sind, die auf Gleichheit, Freiheit und Pluralität basierenden Prinzipien des liberalen Projektes zu teilen. Der Artikel versteht sich somit als Beitrag zur Frage nach dem Zusammenhang von Gender bzw. Gender als soziale Kategorie und illiberaler Politik, die im Bereich der Anti-Gender‑, Religion und Politik sowie Rechtsradikalismusforschung diskutiert wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Name and programme of a parliamentary group in Poland: https://www.polskierado.pl/5/3/Artykul/1019523,Stop-ideologii-gender-Powstal-nwy-zespol-parlamentarny; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  2. Campaign by the German branch of the identitarian movement: https://www.facebook.com/identitaere/posts/1023100517708007; accessed: May 12, 2018.

  3. Even Catholics in New York have mobilised against an alleged “gender ideology”: https://archny.org/gender-ideology; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  4. An exception is Minkenberg (2018).

  5. For an elaborated systematisation of gender as epistemology and analytical tool in political science, see Kantola and Lombardo (2017), p. 20 ff.

  6. A key document is the encyclical Mulieris Dignitatem from August 15, 1988: https://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/de/apost_letters/1988/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_19880815_mulieris-dignitatem.html; accessed: October 18, 2018.

  7. For a comprehensive elaboration of the Catholic origins and meanings of the notion gender ideology, see Kuhar and Paternotte (2017, pp. 9–13).

  8. See the preface to the lexicon by Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo: https://www.ewtn.com/library/CURIA/PCFLEXCN.HTM; accessed: June 1, 2015.

  9. See: https://www.vaticannews.va/de/vatikan/news/2018-03/gender-vatikan-vortrag-amoris-laetitia.html; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  10. This is the title of a petition circulated in Italy in 2015: http://comitatoarticolo26.it/petizione-no-al-gender-nelle-scuole/; accessed: June 1, 2018.

  11. This is the name of a campaign sponsored by a Polish NGO aimed at combatting sexual education in public schools: http://www.stop-seksualizacji.pl/index.php/gender; accessed: June 5, 2018.

  12. The full name is “Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture”: https://www.ordoiuris.pl/kim-jestesmy; accessed: August 31, 2018.

  13. See: http://www.hazteoir.org/conocenos; accessed: August 31, 2018.

  14. See: http://www.lamanifpourtous.fr; accessed: September 6, 2018.

  15. The umbrella institutions of the German Protestant and the Roman Catholic Church adhere to liberal notions of gender: https://www.ekd.de/22591.htm; accessed: June 15, 2018; the Catholic ZdK even outlines and criticises the spread of the “gender-ideology” narrative: http://www.zdk.de/veroeffentlichungen/salzkoerner/detail/Gender-und-Gender-Mainstreaming-721i/; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  16. The active involvement of Orthodox Churches in Russia for instance (Stoeckl 2016) is a field of on-going investigation.

  17. See: https://demofueralle.blog; accessed: September 6, 2018.

  18. See: https://uimeobitelji.net; accessed: September 6, 2018.

  19. In Poland, for instance, “gender” is sometimes associated with “communism” as a totalitarian ideology or a disease imported from Brussels (Graff and Korolszuk 2018). In Germany or France, targets are the left-libertarian activists of 1968. See the case studies in Kuhar and Paternotte (2017).

  20. See: https://edition.cnn.com/2016/08/03/world/pope-gender/; accessed: June 15, 2018 and: https://www.vaticannews.va/de/vatikan/news/2018-03/gender-vatikan-vortrag-amoris-laetitia.print.html; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  21. See: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/world/europe/political-strategy-for-europes-far-right-female-leaders-wooing-female-voters.html; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  22. In Germany or the Netherlands, radical right parties and groups have hijacked gender equality as a strategic argument, upholding women’s emancipation and equal rights between the sexes as core liberal, Western or Christian values over against the allegedly patriarchal and homophobic culture of Muslim immigrants who are accused of disrespecting women (Lum and Renaudière September 17 2014).

  23. See for instance the German-Russian priest who spoke at conference organised by the radical right-wing Jürgen Elsässer, advocating a demographically argued Islamophobic position, which is supported by Gabriele Kuby: https://www.compact-online.de/compact-konferenz/; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  24. Framing here refers to the selective construction of arguments to influence public discourse and to mediate between the individual and the context (Caiani 2017, pp. 6–7).

  25. A case in point would be Gabriele Kuby’s contributions to this kind of discourse (Kuby 2014, 2015).

  26. See: http://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/sections/press-releases/2010/10/new-european-guidelines-on-sexuality-education-experts-say-sexuality-education-should-start-from-birth; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  27. See: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/documents/strategy_equality_women_men_en.pdf, here p. 34; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  28. See: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/opinions_advisory_committee/2010_12_opinion_on_breaking_gender_stereotypes_in_the_media_en.pdf; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  29. See: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20150903IPR91528/meps-call-for-free-gender-equal-public-education-for-all-children; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  30. See: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20150903IPR91528/meps-call-for-free-gender-equal-public-education-for-all-children; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  31. The study on “group focused enmity” also confirms that a “loss of security” in the domains of politics, society, the economy, religion and lifestyle is a relevant factor for developing or exacerbating prejudices; see Heitmeyer, in: https://ekvv.uni-bielefeld.de/blog/uninews/entry/bielefeld_researchers_notice_significant_increases; accessed: June 15, 2018.

  32. Norris and Ingelhart 2003 and Ingelhart and Welzel 2005 also relate risk perception to religiosity and thus to the persistence of religion despite secularisation (Inglehart and Welzel 2005).

References

  • Adolphe, Jane. 2012. “Gender Wars” and the United Nations. Ave Maria Law Review 11:1–31. 2012–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, ​Tjitske. 2015. Gender and the radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis of policy agendas. Patterns of Prejudice 49:1–2, 37–60.

  • Almond, Gabriel A., Emmanuel Sivan, and R. Scott Appleby. 1995. Fundamentalism: genus and species. In Fundamentalism comperehended, ed. E. Martin Marty, R. Scott Appleby, 399–424. Chicago: Chicago Unviversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, Gabriel A., R. Scott Appleby, and Emmanuel Sivan. 2003. Strong religion. The rise of fundamentalisms around the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, Bob, and Bruce Hunsberger. 1992. Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2(2):113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amesberger, Helga, and Brigitte Halbmayr. 2002. Rechtsextreme Parteien, eine mögliche Heimat für Frauen? Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baisley, Elizabeth. 2016. Reaching the tipping point?: Emerging international human rights norms pertaiing to sexual orientation and gender identity. Human Rights Quarterly 38:134–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birsl, Urusla. 2011. Rechtsextremismus und Gender. Opladen & Farmington Hills

  • Brekke, Torkel. 2011. Fundamentalism: prophecy and protest in an age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, Steve. 2003. Politics and religion. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, Steve. 2008. Fundamentalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1991. Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiani, Manuela. 2017. Radical right-wing movements: Who, when, how and why? sociopedia.isa. https://doi.org/10.1177/205684601761.

  • Case, Mary Anne. 2011. After gender the destruction of man? The Vatican’s nightmare vision of the “Gender Agenda” for law. Pace Law Review 31(3):802–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, Mary Anne. 2016. The role of the popes in the invention of complementarity and the anathematization of gender. Religion and Gender 6(2):155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2009. The power of identity: the information age—economy, society, and culture. Proquest Ebook. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G. 1994. On religion and public policy: does catholicism make a difference? European Journal of Political Research 25:19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Life’s dominion: an argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeli, Isabelle, Christopher Green-Pederson, and Lars Thorup Larsen. 2012. Morality politics in western Europe. Parties, agendas and policy choices. London, New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Éric. 2016. Gender and the problem of universals: catholic mobilizations and sexual democracy in France. Gender and Religion 6(2):173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2013. How feminism became capitalism’s handmaiden—and how to reclaim it.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminism-capitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal. Accessed 18 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, Michael. 2015. The elusiveness of European (anti-)liberalism. In Anti-liberal Europe: a neglected story of Europeanization, ed. Dieter Gosewinkel, 33–46. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Elisabeth. 1995. Womens human rights: the emergence of a movement. In Women’s rights, human rights—international feminist perspective, ed. Andrea Wolper, Julie Peter, 18–35. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furseth, Inger. 2011. Why in the city? Explaining urban fundamentalism. In The fundamentalist city. Religiosity and the remaking of Urban space, ed. Nezar AlSayyad, Mejgan Massoumi, 27–50. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, Marie Anne. 1996. What happened at Beijing? First Things. https://www.firstthings.com/article/1996/01/005-what-happened-at-beijing. Accessed 18 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, Agnieszka, and Elżbieta Korolszuk. 2018. Gender as ‘Ebola from Brussels’: the anticolonial frame and the rise of illiberal populism. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43(4):797-821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzebalska, Weronika, Eszter Kováts, and Andrea Petö. 2017. Gender as symbolic glue: how ‘gender’ became an umbrella term for the rejection of the (Neo)liberal order.” Political Critique. http://politicalcritique.org/long-read/2017/gender-as-symbolic-glue-how-gender-became-an-umbrella-term-for-the-rejection-of-the-neoliberal-order/. Accessed 18 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzymała-Busse, Anja. 2015. Nations under god: how churches use moral authority to influence policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1997. Democracy and disagreement: why moral conflict cannot be avaoided in politics, and what should be done about it. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hark, Sabine, and Paula-Irene Villa. 2015. Anti-Genderismus’—Warum dieses Buch? In Anti-Genderismus: Sexualität und Geschlechter als Schauplätze aktueller politischer Auseinandersetzungen, ed. Sabine Hark, Paula-Irene Villa, 7–13. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hark, Sabine, and Paula-Irene Villa. 2017. Unterscheiden und Herrschen: Ein Essay zu den ambivalenten Verflechtungen von Rassismus, Sexismus und Feminismus in der Gegenwart. Berlin: DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeff. 2010. Religion and politics in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. In Religion and politics in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, ed. Jeff Haynes, 1–19. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, Anja. 2012. Moralpolitik und Religion. Bedingungen politisch-religiöser Kooperation in Polen, Italien und Spanien. Würzburg: Ergon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, Anja, Michael Minkenberg, and Zeynep Yanasmayan. 2017. Die Rückkehr von Religion in die Öffentlichkeit: Zur Analyse von Grenzverschiebungen zwischen Religion und Politik am Beispiel Frankreichs und Italiens. In Das Narrativ der Wiederkehr des Religiösen, ed. Oliver Hidalgo. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquot, Sophie. 2015. Transformations in EU gender equality. From emergence to dismantling. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbian, Aline H. 2005. Sexing the church. Gender, power, and ethics in contemporary catholicism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, Johanna. 2010. Gender and the European Union. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, Johanna, and Manuela Lombardo. 2017. Gender and political analysis. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Mechthild. 2018. Interview with Edith Franke „Geschlechterrollen: Vom Mißtrauen der Religionen gegenüber Frauen.“ Deutschlandfunk 22 May 2018. http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/geschlechterrollen-vom-misstrauen-der-religionen-gegenueber.886.de.html?dram:article_id=418411. Accessed 18 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph, Caroline Preidel, and Kerstin Nebel. 2014. Brake rather than barrier: the impact of the catholic church on morality policies in western Europe. West European Politics 37(5):845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kováts, Eszter. 2017. The emergence of powerful anti-gender movements in europe and the crisis of liberal democracy. In Gender and far right politics in Europe, ed. Michaela Köttig, Renate Bitzan, and Andrea Petö, 175–190. Cham: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kováts, Eszter, and Maari Poim. 2015. Gender as symbolic glue. The position and role of conservative and far right parties in the anti-gender mobilization in Europe: Foundation for European Progressive Studies. Budapest: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Ellen. 2003. Einführung in die politikwissenschaftliche Geschlechterforschung. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, Mona Lena, and Jacqui True. 2012. Rethinking the life cycle of international norms: the United Nations and global promotion of gender equality. Journal of International Relations 18(1):103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, Gabriele. 2014. Eine Top-down-Revolution. Der ‚Genderismus‘ zersört Identität und Familie. Herder Korrespondenz 68(11):590–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, Gabriele. 2015. The global sexual revolution: destruction of freedom in the name of freedom. Kettering: Angelico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhar, Roman, and David Paternotte. 2017. Anti-gender campaigns in Europe. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, Linda L. 2016. Gender roles: a sociological perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, Kathryn, and Géraldine Renaudière. 2014. The rise of the extreme-right in Europe: the gender and sexuality dimension of anti-immigration discourse.” CritCom. http://councilforeuropeanstudies.org/critcom/the-rise-of-the-extreme-right-in-europe-the-gender-and-sexuality-dimensions-of-anti-immigrant-discourse/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, David. 1978. A general theory of secularization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, E. Martin, and R. Scott Appleby. 1995. Introduction. In Fundamentalism comprehended, ed. E. Martin Marty, R. Scott Appleby, 1–10. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzouki, Nadia, Duncan McDonnell, and Olivier Roy. 2016. Saving the people. How populist hijack religion. London: C. Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Stefanie, and Birgit Sauer. 2017. “Gender ideology” in Austria: coalition around an empty signifier. In Anti-gender campaigns in Europe, ed. Roman Kuhar, David Paternotte. London, New York: Rowman & LIttlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer Resende, Madalena. 2014. Catholicism and nationalism. Changing nature of party politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, Michael. 2000. The renewal of the radical right: between modernity and anti-modernity. Government and Opposition 35(2):170–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, Michael. 2009. Religion and Euroscepticism: cleavages, religious parties and churches in EU member states. West European Politics 32(6):1190–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, Michael. 2017. The Radical Right in Eastern Europe. Democracy under Siege? New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, Michael. 2018. Religion and the radical right. In The oxford handbook of the radical right, ed. Jens Rydgren, 366–393. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2010. The populist radical right: a pathological normalcy. West European Politics 33(6):1167–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2017. Studying the Populist Radical Right Parties and Politics in the Twenty-first Century. In The Populist Radical Right: A Reader. Cas Mudde (ed.), 609–621. London: Routledge.

  • Mudde, Cas, and Kristóbal Kaltwasser Rovira. 2015. Vox populi or vox masculini? Populism and Gender in Northern Europe and South America. Pattern and Prejudice 49(1–2):16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What is Populism? Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania

  • Norocel, Ov Christian. 2013. Our people—a tight-knit family under the same protective roof. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and secular. Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankowski, Rafal. 2010. The populist radical right in Poland: the patriots. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petö, Andrea. 2015. After ‘emancipation after emancipation’. On Europe’s anti-gender movements. Eurozine. http://www.eurozine.com/after-emancipation-after-emancipation/. Accessed 18 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratzinger, Joseph. 2004. Letter to the bishops on the collaboration of men and women in the church and in the world. Kongregation für die Glaubenslehre. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040731_collaboration_en.html. Accessed 18 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, Andreas. 2017. Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, Andreas. 2018. Sozialdemokratie. Das Band zerreißt. Die Zeit. https://www.zeit.de/2018/09/sozialdemokratie-deutschland-europa-mittelschicht-umbruch. Accessed 18 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesebrodt, Martin. 2001. Die Rückkehr der Religionen. Fundamentalismus und der „Kampf der Kulturen“. Beck’sche Reihe. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydgren, Jens. 2007. The sociology of the radical right. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, Judith, Willy Jansen, and Catrien Notermans. 2011. The gender agenda’: new strategies in catholic fundamentalist framing of non-heterosexuality in Europe. Journal of Religion in Europe 4:273–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Birgit. 2017. Gesellschaftstheoretische Überlegungen zum europäischen Rechtspopulismus. Zum Erklärungspotenzial der Kategorie Geschlecht. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 58(1):3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Verena. 2005. Gender mainstreaming—an innovation in Europe? The institutionalization of gender mainstreaming in the European Union Commission. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmincke, Imke. 2015. Das Kind als Chiffre politischer Auseinandersetzung am Beispiel neuer konservativer Protestbewegungen in Frankreich und Deutschland. In Anti-Genderismus: Sexualität und Geschlechter als Schauplätze aktueller politischer Auseinandersetzungen, ed. Paula-Irene Villa, Sabine Hark, 94–107. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Jane Wallace. 2013. The Uses and Abuses of Gender. Tijidschrift voon Genderstudies 16(1):63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, and Joan Wallach. 1986. Gender: a useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review 91(5):1053–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, Gill. 1988. Right-wing discourse and power: exclusion and resistance. In The nature of the right: feminist analysis of order patterns, ed. Gill Seidel. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Jon Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckl, Kristina. 2016. The Russian Orthodox Church as moral norm entrepreneur. Religion, State, Society 44(2):132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckl, Kristina. Forthcoming. “Homeschooling as Illiberal Policy: The Role of Churches in Russia, Italy and Germany.” In Religion and Illiberal Politics. Actors, Ideologies and Identity Narratives, ed. Ana Hennig and Mirjam Weiberg-Salzmann. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

  • Takács, Judit. 2015. Homophobia and Genderphobia in the European Union: Policy Contexts and Empirical Evidences. Stockholm: SIEPS.

  • Verloo, Mieke. 2018. Varieties of opposition to gender equality in Europe. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, Mike, and Manuela Lombardo. 2007. Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: introducing a critical frame analysis approach. In Multiple meaning of gender equality. A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe, ed. Mike Verloo, 21–49. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, Paula-Irene. 2017. “Anti-Genderismus”: German Angst? In: Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe. Mobilizing against Equality. Roman Kuhar, and David Paternotte (eds.), 99–116. London, New York: Royman & Littlefield.

  • Wiener, Antje. 2009. Enacting meaning-in-use: qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies 35(1):175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Daniel K. 2010. God’s own party: the making of the Christian right. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbauer, Christine, Mona Motakef, and Julia Teschlade. 2015. Prekäre Selbstverständlichkeiten. Neun prekarisierungstheoretische Thesen zu Diskursen gegen Gleichstellungspolitik und Geschlechterforschung. In Anti-Genderismus: Sexualität und Geschlechter als Schauplätze aktueller politischer Auseinandersetzungen, ed. Sabine Hark, Paula-Irene Villa, 41–57. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davies, Nira. 1997. Gender&Nation. London, New York: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharenko, Elena. 2016. Perspectives on anti-choice lobbying in Europe. Study for policy makers on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights in Europe. http://www.heidihautala.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SRHR-Europe-Study-_-Elena-Zacharenco.pdf. Commissioned by Heidi Hautala, MEP. Accessed 10 July 2016.

  • Zick, Andreas, and Beate Küpper. 2014. Group focused enmity: prevalence, correlations, and causes of prejudices in Europe. In The Palgrave handbook of global political psychology, ed. Paul Nesbitt-Larking, Catarina Kinnvall, Tereza Capelos, and Henk Dekker, 242–262. London: Palgrave McMIlan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zick, Andreas, Beate Küpper, and Andreas Hövermann. 2011. Die Abwertung des Anderen. Eine eueopäische Zustandsbeschreibung zu Intoleranz, Vorurteilen und Diskriminierung. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Michael Minkenberg, my colleagues at the Viadrina Institute for European Studies (IFES), and Oliver Hidalgo for their critical comments and helpful insights. Thanks to the IFES Steering Board (Timm Beichelt and Estela Schindel in particular) for supporting this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Hennig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hennig, A. Political genderphobia in Europe: accounting for right-wing political-religious alliances against gender-sensitive education reforms since 2012. Z Religion Ges Polit 2, 193–219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-018-0026-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-018-0026-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation