Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis of Material Interception Networks with P-Graph

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A P-graph model was recently developed for direct reuse/recycle scheme for both in-plant resource conservation networks (RCNs) and inter-plant RCNs (IPRCNs). The proposed P-graph model allows visualization which expedites the assessment of optimal and near-optimal solutions. In this paper, the P-graph model will be extended to material interception schemes, i.e., material regeneration and pre-treatment. Material regeneration involves the use of purification unit for quality improvement of the process sources before they are reused/recycled to the sinks. Pre-treatment processes, on the other hand, involve the purification of fresh resources for use in processes with stringent quality requirement. Two literature case studies are solved to demonstrate the newly extended model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagajewicz M, Savelski M (2001) On the use of linear models for the design of water utilization systems in process plants with a single contaminant. Chem Eng Res Des 79(A):600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Feng X, Deng C (2007) Graphical based optimization of single-contaminant regeneration reuse water systems. Chem Eng Res Des 85(A8):1178–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong FK, Lawrence KK, Lim PP, Poon MCY, Foo DCY, Lam HL, Tan RR (2014) Planning of carbon capture storage (CCS) deployment using P-graph approach. Energy 76:641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi, M. M. (1997). Pollution prevention through process integration: systematic design tools. San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Foo DCY, Manan ZA, El-Halwagi MM (2006) Correct identification of limiting water data for water network synthesis. Clean Techn Environ Policy 8(2):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Tarján K, Huang Y, Fan L (1992a) Graph-theoretic approach to process synthesis: axioms and theorems. Chem Eng Sci 47(8):1973–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo D (2012) Process integration for resource conservation. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Tarjan K, Huang YW, Fan LT (1992b) Combinatorial algorithms for process synthesis. Comput Chem Eng 16:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Tarjan K, Huang Y, Fan L (1993) Graph-theoretic approach to process synthesis: polynomial algorithm for maximal structure generation. Comput Chem Eng 17(9):929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Varga JB, Feher E, Fan LT (1996) Combinatorially accelerated branch-and-bound method for solving the MIP model of process network synthesis. In: Floudas CA, Pardalos PM (eds) State of the art in global optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 609–626

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel FB, El-Halwagi MM (2005) Simultaneous synthesis of waste interception and material reuse networks: problem reformulation for global optimization. Environ Prog 24(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallale N (2002) A new graphical targeting method for water minimisation. Adv Environ Res 6(3):377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckl, I., Friedler F., Fan L. T. 2010. Solution of separation-network synthesis problems by the Pgraph methodology. Computers & Chemical Engineering 34, 700–706.

  • Huang C-H, Chang C-T, Ling H-C, Chang C-C (1999) A mathematical programming model for water usage and treatment network design. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:2666–2679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemeš JJ, Varbanov PS (2015) Spreading the message: P-graph enhancements: implementations and applications. Chem Eng Trans 45:1333–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo WCJ, Smith R (1998) Design of water—using systems involving regeneration. Process Saf Environ Prot 76:94–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam HL (2013) Extended P-graph applications in supply chain and process network synthesis. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2:475–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam HL, Tan RR, Aviso KB (2016) Implementation of P-graph modules in undergraduate chemical engineering degree programs: experiences in Malaysia and the Philippines. J Clean Prod 136:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim CH, Pereira PS, Shum CK, Ong WJ, Tan RR, Lam HL, Foo DCY (2017) Synthesis of resource conservation networks with P-graph approach—direct reuse/recycle. Process Integr Optim Sustain 1(1):69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mafukidze NY, Majozi T (2016) Synthesis and optimisation of an integrated water and membrane network framework with multiple electrodialysis regenerators. Comput Chem Eng 85(2016):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy A, Adonyi B, Halasz R, Friedler L, Fan F, L. T. (2001) Integrated synthesis of process and heat exchanger networks: algorithmic approach. Appl Therm Eng 21:1407–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Tan RR, Tan YL (2007) Ultimate flowrate targeting with regeneration placement. Chem Eng Res Des 85(A9):1253–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Tan RR, Tan YL (2008) Extension of targeting procedure for ‘Ulltmate Flowrate Targeting with Regeneration Placement’ by Ng et al., Che. Eng. Res. Des. 85 (A9): 1253–1267. Chem Eng Res Des 86(10):1182–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Tan RR (2009a) Automated targeting technique for single-component resource conservation networks—part 1: direct reuse/recycle. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(16):7637–7646

  • Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Tan RR (2009b) Automated targeting technique for single-component resource conservation networks—part 2: single pass and partitioning waste interception systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(16):7647–7661

  • Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Tan RR, Pau CH, Tan YL (2009c) Automated targeting for conventional and bilateral property-based resource conservation network. Chem Eng J 149:87–101

  • Ng RTL, Tan RR, Hassim MH (2015) P-graph methodology for bi-objective optimisation for bioenergy supply chains: economic and safety perspectives. Chem Eng Trans 45:1357–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Parand R, Yao HM, Pareek V, Tadé MO (2014) Use of pinch concept to optimize the total water regeneration network. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(8):3222–3235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters MS, Timmerhaus K, West RE (2003) Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, 5th edn. McGraw-hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P-graph Community, 2015, www.p-graph.com, accessed on 07.04.2016

  • Szlama A, Heckl I, Cabezas H (2016) Optimal design of renewable energy systems with flexible inputs and outputs using the P-graph framework. AICHE J 62:1143–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan RR, Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Aviso KB (2009) A superstructure model for the synthesis of single-contaminant water networks with partitioning regenerators. Process Saf Environ Prot 87:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan RR, Benjamin MFD, Cayamanda CD, Aviso KB, Razon LF (2016) P-graph approach to optimizing crisis operations in an industrial complex. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(12):3467–3477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan RR, Aviso KB, Foo DCY (2017) P-graph and Monte Carlo simulation approach to planning carbon management networks. Comput Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.01.047 (in press)

  • Wang, Y. P. Smith, R., 1994. Wastewater minimisation. Chem Eng Sci, 49(7), 981–1006.

  • Yang L, Salcedo-Diaz R, Grossmann IE (2014) Water network optimization with wastewater regeneration models. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:17680–17695

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. C. Y. Foo.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(ZIP 124 kb).

Appendix 1 Mathematical model

The optimization model for a material interception network is given in Eqs. A1–A5 (Foo 2012). Constraint in Eq. A1 describes the flowrate requirement of the sink, which is fulfilled by the flowrate allocated from process sources (F SRi, SKj), regenerated flowrates (F RP,SKj), as well as the fresh resource (F R, SKj). Equation A2 describes the flowrate sent from process and regenerated sources, as well as fresh resource feed must fulfill the minimum quality requirement of the process sinks (which may take the form of concentration or property). The flowrate balance in Eq. A3 indicates that flowrate of each process source may be allocated to sinks or interception unit, while the unutilized source will be sent for waste discharge (with flowrate F SRi, D). Equation A4 indicates that all variables of the superstructural model should take non-negative values. Since the flowrates and quality of the process sink and source, as well as the fresh resource feed are parameters, Eqs. A1–A4are linear. In other words, the superstructural model is a linear program (LP) for which any solution found is globally optimal.

$$ {\sum}_{\mathrm{i}}{F}_{\mathrm{SRi},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SK}j}+{F}_{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{P},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SK}\mathrm{j}}+{F}_{\mathrm{R},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SK}\mathrm{j}}={F}_{\mathrm{SKj}}\kern0.5em \forall j $$
(A1)
$$ {\sum}_{\mathrm{i}}{F}_{\mathrm{SRi},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SKj}}{q}_{\mathrm{SRi}}+{F}_{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{P},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SKj}}{q}_{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{out}}+{F}_{\mathrm{R},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SKj}}{q}_{\mathrm{R}}\ge {F}_{\mathrm{SKj}}{q}_{\mathrm{SKj}}\kern0.5em \forall j $$
(A2)
$$ {\sum}_{\mathrm{j}}{F}_{\mathrm{SRi},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SKj}}+{F}_{\mathrm{SRi},\kern0.5em \mathrm{RE}}+{F}_{\mathrm{SRi},\kern0.5em \mathrm{D}}={F}_{\mathrm{SRi}}\kern0.5em {\forall}_i $$
(A3)
$$ {F}_{\mathrm{SRi},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SKj}},{F}_{\mathrm{R},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SKj}},{F}_{SRi,\kern0.5em \mathrm{D}},{F}_{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{P},\kern0.5em \mathrm{SKj}},{F}_{\mathrm{SRi},\kern0.5em \mathrm{RE}}\ge 0\kern0.5em \forall i,j $$
(A4)

The objective of the optimization problem can be set to minimize the total operating costs (TOC) of the RCN (Eq. A5). Alternatively, we may also minimize the flowrates of both fresh resource (F R) and intercepted source (F RP) using the two-stage optimization approach (Foo 2012). Note that model is a linear program (LP) for which any solution found is globally optimal.

$$ \mathrm{minimize}\ \mathrm{TOC} $$
(A5a)
$$ \mathrm{TOC}=\left({\sum}_j{F}_{R,\mathrm{SK}j}{\mathrm{CT}}_{\mathrm{R}}+{F}_{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{P}}{\mathrm{CT}}_{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{W}}+{F}_{\mathrm{D}}{\mathrm{CT}}_{\mathrm{D}}\right)\mathrm{AOT} $$
(A5b)
where CTR, CTRW, and CT D are the unit costs of fresh resource, regenerated source, and waste discharge, AOT is the annual operating time.

Appendix 2 Degenerate solutions for case study 1

Table 5 Degenerate solution 1 for case study 1 with regeneration scheme (C Reg = 10 ppm)
Table 6 Degenerate solution 2 for case study 1 with regeneration scheme (C Reg = 10 ppm)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, C.H., Pereira, P.S., Shum, C.K. et al. Synthesis of Material Interception Networks with P-Graph. Process Integr Optim Sustain 1, 225–235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-017-0016-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-017-0016-z

Keywords

Navigation