Improvement of bean yield and Fusarium root rot biocontrol using mixtures of Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium
During a screening of beneficial rhizobacteria strains with capability of suppressing Fusarium root rot and improving bean yield, 680 bacteria belonging to Bacillus, fluorescent and non-fluorescent Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium were isolated from commercial field soils and plant root nodules in Zanjan province, Iran. Of these, two hundred representative isolates were biochemically characterized and screened in vitro for inhibiting mycelia growth of Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli. Sixteen rhizobacteria isolates were able to strongly inhibit fungal growth. Five promising rhizobacteria were evaluated for suppressing the disease and promoting plant growth in greenhouse plants. Mixed inoculation of rhizobacteria caused greater increases in disease suppression, dry and fresh matter weight of plant (aerial part) and root, plant height, and pod number per plant compared to diseased control and absolute control. Treatments involving Bacillus subtilis produced higher number of pods compared to other single and dual treatments, except for Rhizobium-Pseudomonas treatment. Treating with rhizobacteria decreased disease severity ratings by 50 to 62% compared to untreated plants. Further examination of the rhizobacteria under field conditions is required to uncover their efficacy in biofertilization and viability as biocontrol agent in bean crops.
KeywordsLegume Phaseolus vulgaris Rhizosphere Yield
The authors acknowledged the sponsorship of the Iranian Ministry of Science, Research and Technology.
- Abeysinghe S (2007) Biological control of Fusarium solani f. Sp. phaseoli the causal agent of root rot of bean using Bacillus subtilis CA32 and Trichoderma harzianum RU0. Ruhuna Journal of Science 2:82–88Google Scholar
- Akhtar MS, Shakeel U, Siddiqui ZA (2010) Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt by Bacillus pumilus, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, and Rhizobium sp. on lentil. Turkish Journal of Biology 32:1–7Google Scholar
- Fahy PC, Hayward AC (1983) Media and methods for isolation and diagnostic tests. Academic Press, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Naseri B (2014) Bean production and Fusarium root rot in diverse soil environments in Iran. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 14:177–188Google Scholar
- Samavat S, Besharati H, Behboudi K (2011) Interactions of rhizobia cultural filtrates with Pseudomonas fluorescens on bean damping-off control. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 13:965–976Google Scholar
- Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W (2001) Laboratoey guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. APS, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
- Scher FM, Zeigle JS, Kloepper JW (1983) A method for assaying the root-colonizing capacity of bacteria on maize. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 69:686–690Google Scholar
- Sheikh LI, Dawar S, Zaki MJ, Ghaffar A (2006) Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis and Rhizobium meliloti with nursery fertilizers in the control of root infecting fungi on mung bean and okra plants. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38:465–473Google Scholar
- Sivasakthi S, Usharani G, Saranraj P (2014) Biocontrol potentiality of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) - Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis: a review. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9:1265–1277Google Scholar
- Svercel M, Duffy B, Defago G (2007) PCR amplification of hydrogen cyanide biosynthetic locus hcnABC in Pseudomonas spp. Journal of Microbiology 70:209–213Google Scholar
- VSN International (2008) GenStat. VSN International Limited, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar