Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Procedures for Teaching Receptive Labeling of Sight Words to a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Brief Practice
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness and efficiency of a modified simple-conditional method and the conditional-only method for teaching receptive labeling of sight words. Jon, a 6-year-old boy diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, participated. Across three comparative evaluations, the conditional-only method resulted in fewer sessions to mastery than a modified simple-conditional method. Textual responses emerged after Jon mastered the sight words as receptive labels. Practitioners should avoid teaching component simple discriminations as a strategy for facilitating conditional discrimination training in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C., Bowman, L., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 10, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism: advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72–85. doi:10.1177/108835760101600203.

  • Grow, L. L., Carr, J. E., Kodak, T., Jostad, C. M., & Kisamore, A. N. (2011). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 475–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-475.

  • Grow, L. L., Kodak, T., & Carr, J. E. (2014). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 600–605. doi:10.1002/jaba.141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grow, L., & LeBlanc, L. (2013). Teaching receptive language skills: recommendations for instructors. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6, 56–75. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, E. J., Eikeseth, S., & Schulze, K. A. (2015). Teaching individuals with autism receptive labeling skills involving conditional discriminations: a comparison of mass trial and intermixing before random rotation, random rotation only, and combined blocking. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 11, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.11.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobari-Wright, V. V., & Miguel, C. F. (2014). The effects of listener training on the emergence of categorization and speaker behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 431–436. doi:10.1002/jaba.115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petursdottir, A. I., & Aguilar, G. (2015). Order of stimulus presentation influences children’s acquisition in receptive identification tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. doi:10.1002/jaba.264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani, D. B., & Lam, W. Y. (2013). A review of comparison studies in applied behavior analysis. Behavioral Interventions, 28, 158–183. doi:10.1002/bin.1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar, P., Rosenberg, M., & Wilson, R. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76. doi:10.1177/01454455155832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedora, J., & Grandelski, K. (2015). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to toddlers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 188–193. doi:10.1002/jaba.167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yaw, J., Skinner, C. H., Maurer, K., Skinner, A. L., Cihak, D., Wilhoit, B., et al. (2014). Measurement scale influences in the evaluation of sight-word reading interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 360–379. doi:10.1002/jaba.126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation was funded by Grant F12-01160 from University of British Columbia’s Hampton Fund Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura L. Grow.

Additional information

Implications for Practice

• Compares the effectiveness and efficiency of a modified simple-conditional method and the conditional-only method for teaching receptive labeling of sight words (i.e., listener skills, conditional discriminations)

• Demonstrates the emergence of textual responses after teaching receptive labeling of sight words

• Describes how instructors can increase textual responses by teaching receptive labeling skills

• Highlights the clinical usefulness of the conditional-only method for teaching receptive labeling skills

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grow, L.L., Van Der Hijde, R. A Comparison of Procedures for Teaching Receptive Labeling of Sight Words to a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Behav Analysis Practice 10, 62–66 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0133-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0133-0

Keywords

Navigation