Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Effectiveness of Two Sight-Word Reading Interventions for a Student with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional drill and practice (TDP) and incremental rehearsal (IR) are flashcard drill techniques for teaching sight words to students. Although both have extensive research support, no study to date has compared these methods with children who have autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Utilizing an adaptive alternating treatments design, the present study compared TDP and IR with a second-grade student, educated in a substantially separate classroom, who was diagnosed with ASD (N = 1). Retention, maintenance, and generalization results suggested that both methods were effective interventions for enhancing sight-word recognition. However, TDP was more effective and efficient than IR across retention, maintenance, and generalization measures. Limitations and implications of the study for school-based professionals are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Burns, M. K., & Sterling-Turner, H. E. (2010). Comparison of efficiency measures for academic interventions based on acquisition and maintenance. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cates, G. L., Burns,M. K., & Joseph, L. (2010). Ensuring efficient learning across the instructional hierarchy: Getting learning to occur is not enough–Introduction to the special series. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H., Watson, T. S., Meadows, T. J., Weaver, A., & Jackson, B. (2003). Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review, 32, 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, E. J., Chafouleas, S., & Skinner, C. H. (2005). Interventions for reading problems: Designing and evaluating effective strategies. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, B. E., Skinner, C. H., Black, M. P., Yaw, J. S., Booher, J., & Delisle, J. (2013). Learning rates and known-to-known flash-card ratios: Comparing effectiveness while holding instructional time constant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 832–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, L. M. (2006). Understanding, assessing, and intervening on reading problems: A guide for school psychologists and other educational consultants. Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, L. M., & Nist, L. M. (2006). Comparing the effects of unknown-known ratios on word reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, L., Eveleigh, E., Konrad, M., Neef, N., & Volpe, R. (2012). Comparison of the efficiency of two flashcard drill methods on children’s reading performance. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. L. (2003). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (9th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. (1973). Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 131–166.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacQuarrie, L. L., Tucker, J. A., Burns, M. K., & Hartman, B. (2002). Comparison of retention rates using traditional drill sandwich and incremental rehearsal flashcard methods. School Psychology Review, 31, 584–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskey, M., Warnell, F., Parr, J. R., Le Couteur, A., & McConachie, H. (2013). Emotional and behavioural problems in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 851–859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nist, L., & Joseph, L. M. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of flashcard drill instructional methods on urban first-graders’ word recognition, acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. School Psychology Review, 37, 294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. A., Loveland, K. A., Lachar, D., Lane, D. M., Reddoch, S. L., Mansour, R., et al. (2006). A comparison of behavioral and emotional functioning in children and adolescents with autistic disorder and PDD-NOS. Child Neuropsychology, 12, 321–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised: Examiner’s manual. In G. H. Roid & L. J. Miller (Eds.), Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood Dale: Stoelting Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, S. J. (1997). The method of repeated readings. The reading teacher, (Vol. 50, pp. 376–381) (Reprinted from The reading teacher, 32, by S. J. Samuels, Ed., 1979).

  • Schmidgall, M., & Joseph, L. M. (2007). Comparison of phonic analysis and whole word-reading on first graders’ cumulative word read and cumulative reading rate: An extension in examining instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. H. (2008). Theoretical and applied implications of precisely measuring learning rates. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. B., & Watson, T. S. (1995/2002). Assessing the relative effects of interventions in students with mild disabilities; Assessing instructional time. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 345-356 (Reprinted from Assessment in Rehabilitation and Exceptionality, 2, 207–220, 1995).

  • Stewart, R., Benner, G., Martella, R., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szadokierski, I., & Burns, M. K. (2008). Analogue evaluation of the effects of opportunities to respond and ratios of known items within drill rehearsal of Esperanto words. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 593–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. A. (1988). Basic flashcard technique when vocabulary is the goal. Unpublished teaching material. Chattanooga: University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, R. J. (2011). Academic Intervention Rating Scale. Boston: Northeastern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, R. J., Burns, M. K., DuBois, M., & Zaslofsky, A. F. (2011a). Computer-assisted tutoring: Teaching letter sounds to kindergarten students using incremental rehearsal. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, R. J., Mulé, C. M., Briesch, A. M., Joseph, L. M., & Burns, M. K. (2011b). A comparison of two flashcard drill methods targeting word recognition. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalon, K. J., Otaiba, S. A., & Delano, M. E. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 3–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina M. Mulé.

Additional information

This project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Grant Number ULITR001064. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mulé, C.M., Volpe, R.J., Fefer, S. et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Two Sight-Word Reading Interventions for a Student with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Behav Educ 24, 304–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9220-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9220-5

Keywords

Navigation