Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation: advantages of a standardized ultrasound definition and classification

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urinary tract dilatation is identified sonographically in 1–2% of fetuses and reflects a spectrum of possible nephro-uropathies. There is significant variability in the clinical management of individuals with prenatal urinary tract dilatation to postnatal urinary pathologies, because of a lack of consensus and uniformity in defining and classifying urinary tract dilation. Ultrasonography is the first step to screen and diagnose kidneys and the urinary tract diseases of the children. The need for a correct ultrasound approach led to the realization of algorithms aimed at standardizing the procedures, the parameters and the classifications. Our objective was to highlight the strengths of the Classification of Urinary Tract Dilation (UTD) suggested by the Consensus Conference which took place in 2014 with the participation of eight Scientific Societies and was subsequently published on the Journal of Pediatric Urology. Before its spread out, the definition of UTD was not uniform and the ultrasonographic measurements were not clearly defined, leading to misunderstandings between physicians. The Classification by the Consensus Conference of 2014 represents a revolutionary tool for the diagnosis and management of UTD. Furthermore, the parameters suggested by the classification proposed are applicable for both prenatal and postnatal classification, ensuring a correct follow-up in children with UTD whose diagnosis had been already made during pregnancy.

Sommario

Dilatazioni a carico delle vie urinarie vengono identificate nell’ 1–2% dei feti e riflettono uno spettro molto variabile di possibilinefro-uropatie. A causa dell’assenza di un chiaro consenso ed uniformità nella definizione e classificazione di dilatazione a carico delle vie urinarie esiste una notevole variabilità nella gestione clinica di soggetti con questa diagnosi prenatale. L’ecografia rappresenta certamente la metodica di primo livello per l’iniziale individuazione e diagnosi di malattie dei reni e delle vie urinarie. L’esigenza di un corretto approccio ecografico ha portato ad una standardizzazione delle procedure, dei parametri e delle classificazioni. L’obiettivo di questo lavoro è quello di evidenziare i punti di forza della Classificazione della dilatazione delle vie urinarie (Urinary Tract Dilation—UTD) suggerita dalla Consensus Conference tenutasi nel 2014 con la partecipazione di 8 società scientifiche e pubblicata successivamente sul Journal of Pediatric Urology. Prima della sua diffusione, infatti, la definizione di UTD non era uniforme e le misurazioni ecografiche non erano chiaramente definite, dando luogo a incomprensioni o diverse interpretazioni tra i medici coinvolti. La classificazione della Consensus Conference del 2014 rappresenta uno strumento rivoluzionario per la diagnosi e la gestione dell’ UTD. I parametri suggeriti da tale classificazione, inoltre, sono applicabili sia al periodo prenatale che a quello postnatale, assicurando una corretta classificazione e follow-up dei bambini con UTD la cui diagnosi sia stata già posta durante la gravidanza.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sferrazza Papa GF, Mondoni M, Volpicelli G, Carlucci P, Di Marco F, Parazzini EM, Reali F, Pellegrino GM, Fracasso P, Sferrazza Papa S, Colombo L, Centanni S (2017) Point-of-Care lung sonography: an audit of 1150 examinations. J Ultrasound Med 36(8):1687–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drudi FM, Di Leo N, Maghella F, Malpassini F, Iera J, Rubini A, Orsogna N, D’Ambrosio F (2014) CEUS in the study of bladder, method, administration and evaluation, a technical note. J Ultrasound Med 17(1):57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Campbell JB, Chow J, Coleman B, Cooper C, Crino J, Darge K, Herndon CD, Odibo AO, Somers MJ, Stein DR (2014) Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 10(6):982–998 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, Boutin H et al (1986) Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classification and clinical applications. Radiology 160(3):645–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the society for fetal urology. Pediatr Radiol 23(6):478–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Onen A (2007) An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 3(3):200–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Onen A, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA (2002) Long-term follow-up of prenatally detected severe bilateral newborn hydronephrosis initially managed nonoperatively. J Urol 168:1118e20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhillon HK (1998) Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Street experience. Br J Urol 81:39e44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chertin B, Rolle U, Farkas A, Puri P (2002) Does delaying pyeloplasty affect renal function in children with a prenatal diagnosis of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction? BJU Int 90:72e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters CA (1998) Lower urinary tract obstruction: clinical and experimental aspects. Br J Urol 81:22e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garin EH (2018) Primary vesicoureteral reflux; what have we learnt from the recently published randomized, controlled trials? Pediatr Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-4045-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey RR (1979) Vesicoureteral reflux in healthy infants and children. In: Hodson J, Kincaid-Smith P (eds) Reflux nephropathy, 1st edn. Masson, New York, pp 59–61

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hains DS, Cohen HL, McCarville MB, Ellison EE, Huffman A, Glass S, Qureshi AH, Pierce KR, Cahill AL, Dixon A, Santos ND (2017) Elucidation of renal scars in children with vesicoureteral reflux using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study. Kidney Int Rep 2(3):420–424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ntoulia A, Anupindi SA, Darge K, Back SJ (2018) Applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the pediatric abdomen. Abdom Radiol 43(4):948–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S, Chimenz R, Fede C, Visalli C, Scribano E (2004) Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 34(6):481–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ključevšek D, Battelino N, Tomažič M, Kersnik Levart T (2012) A comparison of echo-enhanced voiding urosonography with X-ray voiding cystourethrography in the first year of life. Acta Paediatr 101(5):e235–e239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tse KS, Wong LS, Lau HY, Fok WS, Chan YH, Tang KW, Chan SC (2014) Paediatric vesicoureteric reflux imaging: where are we? Novel ultrasound-based voiding urosonography. Hong Kong Med J 20(5):437–443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kis E, Nyitrai A, Varkonyi I et al (2010) Voiding urosonography with second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Nephrol 25:2289–2293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Darge K, Beer M, Gordjani N (2004) Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with the use of a 2nd generation US contrast medium: preliminary results. Pediatr Radiol 34:97

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was secured for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piernicola Pelliccia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

No informed consenti s required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pelliccia, P., Sferrazza Papa, S., Cavallo, F. et al. Prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation: advantages of a standardized ultrasound definition and classification. J Ultrasound 22, 5–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-0340-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-0340-3

Keywords

Navigation