Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 141–148 | Cite as

Economic analysis of novel synergistic biofuel (H2Bioil) processes

  • Navneet R. Singh
  • Dharik S. Mallapragada
  • Rakesh AgrawalEmail author
  • Wallace E. TynerEmail author
Original Article


Fast-pyrolysis based processes can be built on small-scale and have higher process carbon and energy efficiency as compared to other options. H2Bioil is a novel process based on biomass fast-hydropyrolysis and subsequent hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) and can potentially provide high yields of high energy density liquid fuel at relatively low hydrogen consumption. This paper contains a comprehensive financial analysis of the H2Bioil process with hydrogen derived from different sources. Three different carbon tax scenarios are analyzed: no carbon tax, $55/metric ton carbon tax and $110/metric ton carbon tax. The break-even crude oil price for a delivered biomass cost of $94/metric ton when hydrogen is derived from coal, natural gas or nuclear energy ranges from $103 to $116/bbl for no carbon tax and even lower ($99–$111/bbl) for the carbon tax scenarios. This break-even crude oil price compares favorably with the literature estimated prices of fuels from alternate biochemical and thermochemical routes. The impact of the chosen carbon tax is found to be limited relative to the impact of the H2 source on the H2Bioil break-even price. The economic robustness of the processes for hydrogen derived from coal, natural gas, or nuclear energy is seen by an estimated break-even crude oil price of $114–$126/bbl when biomass cost is increased to $121/metric ton.


Break-even crude oil price Fast-pyrolysis Economic analysis Carbon tax Hydrogen from coal Natural gas and nuclear energy Thermochemical processes 





Net present value


Internal rate of return


Benefit to cost ratio


Present value


Hybrid hydrogen-carbon


Hydrogen Bio-oil



Several discussions with Professors W. Nicholas Delgass and Fabio H. Ribeiro are gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Solar Economy IGERT (Grant No. NSF 0903670) and the US Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG316-08GO18087) for the support of this work.


  1. 1.
    Greene N, Celik FE, Dale BE, Jackson M, Jayawardhana K, Jin H, Larson ED, Laser MS, Lynd LR, MacKenzie D, Mark J, McBride J, McLaughlin S, Saccardi D (2004) Growing energy: how biofuels can help end America’s oil dependence. Natural Resources Defense Council, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NRC (2009) Liquid transportation fuels from coal and biomass: technological status, costs, and environmental impacts. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak RidgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem Rev 9:4044–4098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elliott DC (2007) Historical developments in hydroprocessing bio-oils. Energ Fuel 3:1792–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agrawal R, Singh NR (2010) Solar energy to biofuels. Ann Rev Chem Biomol Eng 1:343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larson ED (2006) A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energ Sustain Dev 2:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pimentel D, Patzek TW (2005) Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Nat Resour Res 1:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agrawal R, Singh NR, Ribeiro FH, Delgass WN (2007) Sustainable fuel for the transportation sector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 12:4828–4833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mallapragada DS, Singh NR and Agrawal R (2011) Energy systems analysis for a renewable transportation sector. In: Pistikopoulos EN, Georgiadis MC, Kokossis AC (eds) Computer aided chemical engineering, vol 29. Elsevier, pp 1889–1893Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agrawal R, Singh NR (2009) Synergistic routes to liquid fuel for a petroleum deprived future. AICHE J 7:1898–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh NR, Delgass WN, Ribeiro FH, Agrawal R (2010) Estimation of liquid fuel yields from biomass. Environ Sci Technol 13:5298–5305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wright MM, Brown RC, Boateng AA (2008) Distributed processing of biomass to bio-oil for subsequent production of Fischer–Tropsch liquids. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 3:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huber GW (March 2008) NSF 2008. breaking the chemical and engineering barriers to lignocellulosic biofuels: next generation hydrocarbon biorefineries. Dissertation, National Science Foundation. Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems Division., Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH (2006) Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energ Fuel 3:848–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh NR (2009) High liquid fuel yielding biofuel processes and a roadmap for the future transportation. Dissertation, Purdue University, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ringer M, Putsche V, Scahill J (2006) Large scale pyrolysis oil production: a technology assessment and economic analysis. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, GoldenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang M, Wu M, Huo H (2007) Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Environ Res Lett 2:024001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA (2008) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    NRC (2004) The NRC report—the hydrogen economy-opportunites, costs, barriers, and R&D needs. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campbell HF, Brown RPC (2003) Benefit-cost analysis: financial and economic appraisal using spreadsheets/Harry F. Campbell and Richard P.C. Brown. Cambridge University Press, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) From the cover: environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 30:11206–11210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brechbill SC, Tyner WE, Ileleji KE (2008) The economics of biomass collection, transportation, and supply to Indiana cellulosic and electric utility facilities. Purdue University, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones SB, Valkenburg C, Walton CW, Elliott DC, Holladay JE, Stevens DJ, Kinchin C, Czernik S (2009) Production of gasoline and diesel from biomass via fast pyrolysis, hydrotreating and hydrocracking: a design case. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, RichlandGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    EIA (August 2009) Petroleum Marketing Annual 2008 Energy Information Adminstration,Office of Oil and Gas, U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC
  27. 27.
    Rismiller CW, Tyner WE (2009) Cellulosic biofuels analysis: economic analysis of alternative technologies. Purdue University, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tyner WE (2009) Big time issues facing the ethanol industry. Ethanol today October:44–46Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anex RP, Aden A, Kazi FK, Fortman J, Swanson RM, Wright MM, Satrio JA, Brown RC, Daugaard DE, Platon A, Kothandaraman G, Hsu DD, Dutta A (2010) Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways. Fuel 0:S29–S35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wright MM, Brown RC (2007) Comparative economics of biorefineries based on the biochemical and thermochemical platforms. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 1:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations