Diabetes Therapy

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 501–519 | Cite as

Insulin Matters: A Practical Approach to Basal Insulin Management in Type 2 Diabetes

  • Lori Berard
  • Noreen Antonishyn
  • Kathryn Arcudi
  • Sarah Blunden
  • Alice Cheng
  • Ronald Goldenberg
  • Stewart Harris
  • Shelley Jones
  • Upender Mehan
  • James Morrell
  • Robert Roscoe
  • Rick Siemens
  • Michael Vallis
  • Jean-François Yale
Open Access
Practical Approach


It is currently estimated that 11 million Canadians are living with diabetes or prediabetes. Although hyperglycemia is associated with serious complications, it is well established that improved glycemic control reduces the risk of microvascular complications and can also reduce cardiovascular (CV) complications over the long term. The UKPDS and ADVANCE landmark trials have resulted in diabetes guidelines recommending an A1C target of ≤ 7.0% for most patients or a target of ≤ 6.5% to further reduce the risk of nephropathy and retinopathy in those with type 2 diabetes (T2D), if it can be achieved safely. However, half of the people with T2D in Canada are not achieving these glycemic targets, despite advances in diabetes pharmacological management. There are many contributing factors to account for this poor outcome; however, one of the major factors is the delay in treatment advancement, particularly a resistance to insulin initiation and intensification. To simplify the process of initiating and titrating insulin in T2D patients, a group of Canadian experts reviewed the evidence and best clinical practices with the goal of providing guidance and practical recommendations to the diabetes healthcare community at large. This expert panel included general practitioners (GPs), nurses, nurse practitioners, endocrinologists, dieticians, pharmacists, and a psychologist. This article summarizes the panel recommendations.


Basal insulin Glycemic target Insulin initiation Insulin titration Patient barriers Patient follow-up Treatment delay Type 2 diabetes 

Basal Insulin Initiation

Do We Still Need Insulin?

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a progressive disorder characterized by multiple pathophysiological defects. The core defects include insulin resistance in the muscle and liver and impaired insulin secretion due to β-cell failure [1, 2]. The progressive nature of the disease is such that it requires therapy to be intensified over time to compensate for the ongoing β-cell deficiency [2, 3, 4]. At the time of T2D diagnosis, more than 50% of β-cells have already been lost, and continue to decline at an average rate of 5% per year [1, 2, 5]. Therefore, the use of insulin is an appropriate option at any point in the management of T2D to replace the insulin that the pancreas is unable to produce sufficiently [1, 6]. In fact, when the maximum output of insulin has decreased to 15% or 20% of normal, non-insulin anti-hyperglycemic agents can no longer sustain glycemic control and insulin supplementation becomes a necessity [5]. The usual starting point for insulin therapy in T2D is with basal insulin owing to its simplicity and lower risk of hypoglycemia [7].

When and in Whom to Initiate Insulin in T2D

The panel recommendations as to when and in whom to initiate insulin are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

When and in whom to initiate insulin in T2D

When to consider insulin initiation

When NOT to initiate insulin

Maximally tolerated non-insulin agents but A1C above the individualized target (usually 7.0%)

New diagnosis A1C ≥ 8.5%

Metabolic decompensation

End-organ failure

Patients with previous or current gestational diabetes

Acute illness

Prolonged course of steroids

Intolerance to oral medications

Any time you consider this is an appropriate option for your patients from diagnosis onwards

There are no contraindications for the use of insulin but insulin may not be appropriate for:

Some older, asymptomatic patients, who may not gain sufficient benefit because of short life expectancy

People limited in their capacity (physical or cognitive) to manage their diabetes who are at greater risk of hypoglycemia

What are the Barriers to Insulin Initiation?

Clinical inertia, defined as the failure on the part of the provider to advance therapy when required, adversely affects timely management of T2D [9, 10, 11, 12]. Insulin is often initiated late in the course of the disease, after failure with multiple antihyperglycemic agents, and at glycemic values well above the recommended targets [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. In Canada, mean A1C levels are > 8.5% and mean diabetes duration is ≥ 9 years before initiation of basal insulin in T2D patients [13, 15]. A UK retrospective study of pharmacologically treated T2D patients on one, two, or three oral antihyperglycemic agents reported that the median time to insulin initiation was > 7 years with an A1C ≥ 7.0% and the mean A1C levels at initiation was > 9.0% [12].

There are many barriers that contribute to this delay in initiation and intensification of insulin in T2D. It is important to emphasize that many of these barriers reflect the attitudes and beliefs of both patient and provider. Identifying and addressing both provider and patient beliefs and attitudes are therefore essential to mitigate those barriers (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 2

Provider barriers

Provider barriers

Panel recommendations to address provider barriers

Concerns about the risks to patients [3, 11, 16, 17]:

Recognize the low risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain with earlier use of basal insulin in T2D [18, 19]

  Excess weight gain


  Impaired quality of life

Recognize the lower risk of hypoglycemia with each successive generation of basal insulin (human vs analogue vs next generation analogue) [14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]

Assumptions about patient inability to use insulin

Assumptions about patient refusal to use insulin

Discuss with your patient. Do not assume that your patient is uninterested or non-adherent. Negotiate benefit versus risk or initiation versus inaction [3, 34]

Awareness that most people can manage their treatment with appropriate education and support [3, 17]

[3, 11, 17, 33]

Diabetes education and allied support (cognitive behavior therapy and motivational communication) by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to improve adherence and health outcomes [16, 33, 34, 35, 36]

Lack of resources [3, 11, 16, 17, 33]:

  Drug costs

  Availability of staff

  Skills needed to support insulin initiation


Include the family members/caregivers in the educational and ongoing support [34, 37, 38]

Consider getting support from qualified team members or community [3, 34, 36]

Utilize resources from Diabetes Canada including:

The Insulin Prescription Tool: and videos:

Reluctance to utilize insulin early in the diagnosis of T2D [9]

Recognize that delaying therapy prevents patients from achieving A1C targets and increases the occurrence of major diabetes complications [9, 12]

Table 3

Patient barriers [39, 40, 41, 42, 43]


Panel recommendations

Fear of needles or apprehension toward injections

Feeling that insulin is too complicated

[3, 11, 16, 33, 44]

Demonstrate injection technique: show the insulin pen and small needle tips. Apply the principles of systematic desensitization (self-controlled exposure)

Highlight that the injection is into subcutaneous tissue, not a vein

Invite patient to try these without insulin, in your office (i.e., dry injection); give first injection together with patient to observe, support and ensure correct administration of insulin

Educating on injections: see

Feeling that this is a personal failure [3, 11, 16, 33, 45]

Pro-action. Do not wait to talk about insulin once the patient needs insulin. Explain from the time of diagnosis that insulin is a likely treatment option in the course of T2D [46]

Discuss with the patient, using decisional balance analysis (pros and cons), that need to advance therapy is due to the progressive nature of diabetes, not because the patient has done something wrong

Belief that insulin causes diabetes complications [3, 11, 16, 33]

Insulin is a natural hormone and a replacement therapy [42]

Explain why insulin becomes necessary for most patients with diabetes eventually; it is not a punishment [46]

Explain that use of insulin will help achieve glycemic target and minimize the risk of complications [47, 48]

Concerns over hypoglycemia (BG < 4.0 mmol/L) [3, 11, 16, 33, 49, 50, 51, 52]

Reassure the patient that most hypoglycemic episodes are mild. Severe hypoglycemia (defined as requiring assistance by another person) is relatively rarea [52];

[53]; [20, 29, 42, 47, 54]

Educate the patient on how to recognize and respond to symptoms [52]

Make sure the patient and partner/family (if applicable) know how to recognize, treat, and avoid hypoglycemia, and how to self-adjust insulin [34]

Choose insulins and regimens with lower rates of hypoglycemia [14, 29]

Use systematic desensitization to allow the patient to work from a psychologically safe zone to a medically safe zone

Concerns over weight gain [3, 11, 16, 33]

Encourage healthy diet and moderate exercise. Monitor weight.

Combine insulin with metformin or other NIAHA with weight benefit. [14, 29]

Explain that weight gain with basal insulin regimens is small especially with newer basal insulin analogues (1–2 kg) [14, 20, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32]

Belief that insulin can never be stopped and will restrict lifestyle [3, 4, 16, 33, 42]

Offer a 3-month trial period with subsequent reassessment.

Recall that engaging the patient in the decision empowers them and leads to better outcomes [3, 4]

Prescribe once-daily basal insulin that minimizes inconvenience and is easy to use.

NIAHA non-insulin anti-hyperglycemic agent, BG blood glucose

aIn UKPDS, the annual incidence of severe hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients was < 3%. With the newer long-acting basal insulins this is even lower (2.3%) [47]

What is Your Role in Insulin Therapy?

Success in overcoming patient barriers relies greatly on listening to the patient and proactively addressing their fears and concerns [55, 56]. Open dialogue with the patient throughout the continuum of diabetes management, with an emphasis on the positive benefits of insulin therapy, will significantly enhance the outcomes for patients with diabetes. See Table 4 for review of action points with your patient.
Table 4

A new LEASE on insulin management [55]

Listen and ask

Actively listen to fears and concerns. Normalize these concerns before discussing alternatives

Invite discussion, show conviction of belief and supportive body language


Ask permission to educate about the importance of insulin, the progressive nature of the disease, how to self-manage their disease


Proactively address patient concerns that may deter initiation and adherence to insulin

Ask questions, identify the barriers, outline goals


Enlist support of diabetes management team

Provide continuous support and education through the course of treatment


Encourage and educate the patient on self-management: demonstrate how the pen works and let them try it, explain how to take medications, how to self-monitor blood glucose, how to prevent and treat hypoglycemia, reinforce healthy lifestyle and diet

Be comfortable with the principle of shaping: in other words, with repetition and support for next step goals, self-efficacy in a new behavior can develop

Basal Insulin Dose and Titration Recommendations

In light of the persistent barriers contributing to delays in diabetes management with insulin, there is an urgent need for a simplified and practical approach to the initiation and intensification of insulin. Complex regimens and unrealistic targets can worsen the patient’s engagement in the process and ultimately the patient’s well-being [3, 4, 57]. Simplification allows for empowerment by engaging the patient in doable tasks, which provides the context for behavior shaping (next step goals) and self-efficacy (confidence in the face of barriers) [58].

What Do We Want in a Basal Insulin Recommendation?

  • A starting dose that can be safely applied and individualized.

  • A titration schedule that is simple and can be safely patient-driven, with a fasting blood glucose (FBG) target that can be individualized. Patient-driven titration schedules are as effective as provider-driven titration schedules [19, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64] and engage the patient, which in turn can lower barriers to insulin therapy [4, 65, 66].

  • Clear instructions to the patient on how the dose will be titrated, to manage expectations which will empower the patient and improve adherence to therapy [3, 4, 16, 66].

  • Recognition that insulin initiation and titration are two separate behaviors for the patient, each of which needs to be addressed in relation to patient readiness to change.

How to Select a Basal Insulin?

Three generations of basal insulins are available in Canada. The first generation of basal insulin is NPH, a human insulin that has been available for many decades, since 1946. The basal analogues (insulins detemir and glargine (Gla-100)) emerged in the 2000s and provided longer duration of action, improved day-to-day variability, reduced hypoglycemia, especially nocturnal, and did not require resuspension (as does NPH) [67]. A next generation of long-acting basal insulins—insulins glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and degludec—have emerged with an extended action profile, improved safety, and the advantage of being administered in smaller volumes [29]. Table 5 summarizes the main characteristics of the currently available basal insulins. The panel recognizes that the choice of basal insulin may depend on access, cost, and clinical judgment with respect to the patient’s individual needs and lifestyle [29].
Table 5

Basal insulins

Insulin classification

Duration of action

CV safety

Risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia




~ 18 h


Needs resuspension

Administered usually twice daily



16–24 h


Administered once or twice daily


~ 24 h

Demonstrated (neutral)


Administered once daily, same time of day

Available in a fixed-ratio combination with lixisenatide

Next generation

Gla-300 (U300)

~ 30 hb

Demonstrateda (neutral)


Smaller volume (U300)

Administered once daily

Flexible +

Degludec (U100, U200)

~ 30 hb

Demonstrated (neutral)


Option smaller volume (U200)

Administered once daily

Flexible ++

U100 available in a fixed-ratio combination with liraglutide

Duration of action and considerations:; [14, 29, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78]. Degludec and Gla-300 studies: [18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 70, 79, 80]

Gla-100 glargine 100 U/mL, Gla-300 glargine 300 U/mL

+ Insulins with low risk of hypoglycemia; ++ Insulins with moderate risk of hypoglycemia; +++ Insulins with higher risk of causing hypoglycemia

aBased on results from ORIGIN with Gla-100

bPK/PD studies at 0.4 U/kg

How to Dose?

There are several important concepts to remember when dosing basal insulin: (a) the starting dose will be wrong; (b) there is no maximal insulin dose; (c) titration of insulin dose is the key [8]. Each of these concepts needs to be explicitly discussed and understood by the patient in order for titration to be successful. Despite 92% of physicians agreeing that “insulin intensification is an essential element of diabetes management,” 30% of primary care physicians “never or rarely” personally intensified insulin (vs 4% of specialists) in the multinational survey MODIFY [14, 81]. Interestingly, in a recent multinational survey, HCPs generally preferred a gradual and safe approach to titration to avoid hypoglycemia whereas patients are frustrated by time to reach goal [66]. It is therefore important to manage the patient’s expectations.

The starting dose for basal insulin recommended by this panel is 10 U/day. The dose should be incrementally increased on a regular basis using target FBG as the determinant for dose adjustments. At initiation, educating patients that many people will need at least 40–50 units of basal insulin to achieve target FBG is useful for goal setting and behavior shaping. This may help mitigate patient fear/reluctance to up-titrate [8].

Box 1A details the recommendations by the panel for basal insulin dose and titration.

Box 1B provides a summary of key recommendations, including a starting dose and titration schedule.

Basal Insulin Dose and Titration Recommendations (2017)

Box 1A: 2017 recommendations by the panel for basal insulin dose and titration


Panel recommendations


The initial dosea

10 U/day

[19, 22, 59]

Other considerations:

  0.2 U/kg/day [68, 82]

  Using FBG as starting point: e.g., if FBG is 16 mmol/L start at 16 U [59]

May need to be lower for some patients—recall that the starting dose should be individualized [14]

The lower dosages have the advantage of decreasing the risk of a hypoglycemic reaction with the first injection, but make the titration period a bit longer

Discuss and negotiate your patient’s expectation

Fasting SMBG target

Target should be 4.0–7.0 mmol/L for most people

  Patient/HCP contact recommended at 7.0 mmol/L. HCP may then suggest continuing to 4.0–5.5 mmol/L

[19, 20, 59, 80, 83, 84, 85]

Individualize target with a step approach (within 3 months) [14]

Important to educate that diabetes is a progressive disease and this is a moving target [4]

Dose adjustments

Select a simple titration algorithm that matches patient lifestyle [57]

The following dose adjustment algorithms have been shown to be safe and effective. Select the one that is easiest for the patient to follow:

One easy titration algorithm is

1 unit every dayb [19, 63, 64, 66]

Other titration algorithms include:

2 units twice weekly based on lowest fasting SMGB value of the last 3 days [26, 27, 62, 86]

Every week, based on lowest fasting SMGB value of the last 3 days [26, 63, 64]

Other considerations:

  If (nocturnal) hypoglycemia occurs (BG < 4.0 mmol/L) reduce the dose by 2–4 units, or 10% of the basal dose based on clinical judgement [57]

  For other considerations, see Table 6

Measure glucose level at least every morning before breakfastc [57]

Remind patient to adjust the basal insulin based on morning glucose not bedtime glucosec [57]

Assess for possible hypoglycemia (< 4.0 mmol/L) and decrease titration [52]

Recognize that patient fear of hypoglycemia is easily elicited (hypoglycemia is a traumatic stress) and that providers underestimate the psychological impact of nonsevere hypoglycemia [51]

Mitigating hypoglycemia:

Is there an identifiable cause? [52]

Teach patients how to prevent, recognize, and treat hypoglycemia [52]

Confirm with patient that it is not “pseudo-hypoglycemia”. Explain what pseudo-hypoglycemiad is and ways to mitigate it [54]

If no identifiable and preventable cause is identified, reduce the dose

Confirm patient is using an accurate glucometer

Optimal/maximum basal insulin dose

Educate the patient of their expected dose [3, 57]

In most studies: 40 to 50 units is needed [8, 19, 26, 27, 66]

Communicate how long it will take them to reach target (e.g., if the expected dose is 60 units at 1 U/day increase, then it will take on average 6 weeks)

Indication that basal insulin is not enough includes:

Up-titrations without a corresponding drop on BG (verify patient adherence and check injection sites).

Patient has surpassed 1 U/kg/day of basal insulin without sufficient FBG control [87]

FBG in target, but A1C above target

BG blood glucose, FBG fasting blood glucose, SMBG self-monitored blood glucose

aFor more information on how to handle any oral agents and other FAQs, see Tables 6 and 7

bAlgorithm proven safe and effective with insulin glargine 100 units/mL (Lantus®) and 300 units/mL (Toujeo™)

cAdjust accordingly if shift worker

dPseudo-hypoglycemia: an event in which the patient experiences symptoms of hypoglycemia with a BG > 3.9 mmol/L but approaching that level [54]

Frequent Questions and What to Do with Previous Drugs When Initiating Basal Insulin

Tables 6 and 7 outline some of the frequently encountered questions and concerns facing HCPs when initiating and titrating basal insulin.
Table 6

Frequently asked questions and concerns



Is 4.0 to 7.0 mmol/L too aggressive?

Depends on individual target and patient characteristics (e.g., younger patient, patient with established retinopathy/nephropathy, etc.).

Is there a ceiling to titration process?

There is no such thing as a maximum dose [8]

Consider resuming titration when FBG values are above patient-agreed target for 3 consecutive days; resume 1 unit daily titration unti FBG < 7.0 mmol/L is reached without hypoglycemia

  Patient/HCP contact recommended at 7.0 mmol/L

What to do if daytime hypoglycemia occurs while on secretagogues?

Dose adjustment of secretatogue and/or basal insulin recommended

If on NPH, consider basal analogue

When is it appropriate to intensify treatment with another agent?

When A1C level remains above individual target after 3–6 months despite appropriate treatment initiation and optimization have occurred or insulin dose is > 1.0 U/kg/day.

What to do if sickness occurs?

Normally continue with the usual dose of basal insulin

Test more frequently

If problems eating or hydrating: stop metformin, SGLT2 inhibitor, insulin secretagogue, ACE inhibitor, ARBs, diuretic, NSAIDs

Use SADMANS Complete the card (accessed by clicking on the link) and give it to your patient, including when to call and whom to reach for support [88]

What to do if patient has recently been hospitalized for a few days?

Verify if the dosages were modified during the hospitalization. The dosages are often decreased as the patient eats hospital food, and must often be increased back towards the previous dosages

What to do if unsure whether the dose was given?

Do not give the dose if unsure

Test more frequently

If values rise, may consider giving half the dose [88]

Additional comments:

Suggest using supportive tools or an insulin pen that has a memory feature that will indicate if the dose was given and when

What to do if gave the dose twice?

Test more frequently

Take extra snack at bedtime

Wake up every 2–3 h to test glucose. If < 7.0 mmol/L, take an extra snack [88]

Additional comments:

Check available resources in area:

For example, call a nurse for advice, diabetes educator available for support, a 24 h pharmacy for a pharmacist’s advice

Phone an “on-call” service and consider referral to ER

What to do if missed a dose?

If < 6 h: take usual dose (be aware of potential increase in risk of hypoglycemia with next injection)

If 6–12 h: take 50% of normal dose

If > 12 h: consider omitting dose or give 50% when remember and 50% next dose and resume as per usual dosing administration schedule [89]

Additional comments

Recall that new long-acting basal insulins provide greater flexibility [24, 86]

Does insulin stacking (build-up of insulin in the circulation) occur with the long-acting basal insulins? [90]

No, there will be a steady state reached. The steady state will take longer to reach the longer the half-life of the insulin, minimizing the fluctuations in insulin levels [90]

When to consider seeking support from other HCPs? [87]

Patient has surpassed 1 U/kg/day of basal insulin without sufficient FBG control

Patient has recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia

Patient lacks engagement in the titration process. It is important to explore reasons for lack of engagement by screening for diabetes distress

When to refer to a specialist? [87]

Patient has frequent episodes of unexplained hypoglycemia

Patient experiences complications (allergic reactions, lack of treatment response, edema, etc.)

A1C level remains above individual target after 3–6 months despite appropriate treatment initiation and optimization have occurred

At any point when comfort level is exceeded with available resources. It should be openly acknowledged that if either the patient or provider thinks they are “in over their head,” accessing additional resources is appropriate

SGLT2 sodium-glucose co-transporter 2, ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARB angiotensin receptor blockers, NSAIDs non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Table 7

What to do with previous drugs [8, 57, 91, 92]: usually continue all current anti-hyperglycemic agents when initiating basal insulin

Anti-hyperglycemic agent

Anti-hyperglycemic agents when initiating basal insulin




Insulin secretagogues

(meglitinide and sulfonylurea (SU))

Options to continue, reduce, or stop the sulfonylurea [7, 8, 93]

Option to continue, reduce, or stop meglitinide [8]

If SU is stopped or reduced, titration of insulin is even more important

When stopping SUs:

  Patients may need more insulin or go beyond basal insulin as glucose levels may go higher

  As a guideline, stopping SU is equivalent to about 20 U of insulin. Individual results necessitate monitoring and titration [94]


Usually discontinueda [95]

Due to increased risk of edema and heart failure with insulin [8, 96]

Incretin agents (GLP-1R agonist, DPP4i)

Continueda [8, 97]

SGLT2 inhibitor


GLP-1R glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor, DPP4i protease dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, SGLT2 sodium-glucose co-transporter 2, TZD thiazolidinedione

aRecommendation to decrease TZDs is not indicated in Canada; linagliptin use with insulin is off-label (Trajenta®)

Patient Support and Medical Follow-up

How to Ensure Success of Basal Insulin Management?

The success of basal insulin initiation and titration relies not only on identifying and addressing the patient and practitioner barriers but also on contact frequency with the patient. Post-initiation follow-up may occur by many means including via phone, text, email (depending on jurisdiction), cloud, or virtual consult. Regular contact presents an opportunity to provide or revisit diabetes education, to provide support to patients on how to effectively self-manage their disease and to identify any causes of concern [3, 34]. Furthermore, titration should be revisited when the patient is not achieving goal, hypoglycemia occurs, or there is a change in the insulin type or brand (e.g., biosimilar) [87].

The panel provides guidelines for medical follow-up with patients in Box 2.

Panel Recommendations for Medical Follow-up with Diabetes HCPs

Box 2: panel recommendations for medical follow-up with diabetes HCPs [87, 91]


What and why

24–72 h

When initiating insulin or titration

Support insulin initiation and reinforce titration

1–2 week(s)

Patients report BG readings

Ensure titration is occurring normally

1 month

Patients report BG readings

Ensure titration is occurring normally (it is encouraged to continue with biweekly contacts thereafter)

3 months

A1C measurement

If not at goal, patient may continue with titration for another 3 months

This contact point should occur in person or by virtual consult

6 months

A1C measurement

Follow-up of titration

If A1C above target, review glycemic profile and consider adding mealtime insulin

Within 24 h of hypoglycemia

Educate patient on recognizing, preventing, and treating hypoglycemia

If recurrent hypoglycemia occurs, re-evaluate titration schedule or reduce dose (frequent, recurrent hypoglycemia is typically defined as 1–2 lows in 1 week)


Several factors underlie the importance of the initiative put forth by this expert panel: there is a rising prevalence of diabetes [98]; half of the T2D population is not at target, among which 61% were receiving insulin therapy [99], suggesting delayed insulin initiation and intensification; there are multiple titration algorithms to choose from which adds to the confusion and complexity for patients and providers; and the arrival of new long-acting basal insulins and other pharmacological and technological advances that require consideration. This document was developed by a multidisciplinary panel to address frequently asked questions on insulin initiation and titration, and it establishes simple and practical guidelines for diabetes HCPs for effective initiation and titration of basal insulin, with the intent that it may translate to effective glycemic outcomes in clinical practice.

Compliance with Ethical Guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.




This publication was supported by Sanofi-Aventis Canada (Laval, Quebec), who funded editorial and managerial support in the preparation of this publication, provided by a third party, HIT Global Consulting Services Inc. The article processing charges were also funded by Sanofi-aventis Canada (Laval, Quebec).

Medical Writing and Editorial Assistance

The manuscript was designed, drafted, and edited by the panel with the help of medical writer, Maria Ferraiuolo of HIT Global Consulting Services Inc. The authors, individually and collectively, were responsible for content and editorial decisions.


The manuscript was conceived by the panel of experts recognized here as the co-authors. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published. All authors had full access to all of the data used for this article and take complete responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data analysis.


Lori Berard has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium from Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, BD, and MontMed. Noreen Antonishyn has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium from Sanofi. Kathryn Arcudi has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium from Janssen, Abbott Nutrition, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, and Sanofi. Sarah Blunden has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium from Ascencia, Abbott Diabetes, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi. Alice Cheng has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium, speaker honorarium, or research support from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Servier, and Takeda. Ronald Goldenberg has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium, speaker honorarium, or research support from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. Stewart Harris has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium or research support from Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Bi/Lilly, Merck, and Janssen. Shelley Jones has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium from Abbott, AZ, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. Upender Mehan has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium or unrestricted funding from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Dairy Farmers of Canada. James Morrell has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium or research support from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Island Health, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Abbott, and MontMed. Robert Roscoe has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium or speaker honorarium/other from Novo Nordisk, Abbott Diabetes Care, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Merck Canada, Sanofi Canada, Banting & Best Diabetes Program, New Brunswick Government, Becton–Dickinson Canada, Novo Nordisk Canada, Bayer Healthcare, BMS AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Eli Lilly Canada, Medtronic Canada, Abbott Diabetes Care, Roche Diagnostics, Canadian Pharmacists Association, Canadian Diabetes Association, and New Brunswick Pharmacists Association. Rick Siemens has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Janssen, and Merck. Michael Vallis has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium, speaker honorarium, or research support from Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Abbvie, Valeant, Merck, CSL Behring, and Pfizer. Jean-François Yale has received consultancy/advisory board honorarium or research support from Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Mylan.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.


  1. 1.
    DeFronzo RA, Eldor R, Abdul-Ghani M. Pathophysiologic approach to therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 2):S127–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pratley RE. The early treatment of type 2 diabetes. Am J Med. 2013;126(9 Suppl 1):S2–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ross SA. Breaking down patient and physician barriers to optimize glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Am J Med. 2013;126(9 Suppl 1):S38–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barag SH. Insulin therapy for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: strategies for initiation and long-term patient adherence. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(7 Suppl 5):S13–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lebovitz HE. Diabetes Review 1999;7(3):139–53.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palumbo PJ. The case for insulin treatment early in type 2 diabetes. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71(5):385–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holman RR, Farmer AJ, Davies MJ, et al. Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(18):1736–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng AYY. The rules of 3s: insulin use in type 2 diabetes. Can Diabetes. 2011;24(1):3–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lovshin JA, Zinman B. Diabetes: clinical inertia–a barrier to effective management of T2DM. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9(11):635–6. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(9):825–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khunti K. Clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a focused literature review. Br J Diabetes. 2015;15(2):65–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, Andersen M, Davies MJ. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11):3411–7. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris SB, Kapor J, Lank CN, Willan AR, Houston T. Clinical inertia in patients with T2DM requiring insulin in family practice. Can Fam Phys. 2010;56(12):e418–24.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khunti K, Millar-Jones D. Clinical inertia to insulin initiation and intensification in the UK: a focused literature review. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(1):3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheng AY, et al. Barriers to achieve A1C target in patients with T2D: Key learnings from a Canadian personal practice assessment. December 2015; IDF/WDC Meeting 0738-P.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ng CJ, Lai PS, Lee YK, Azmi SA, Teo CH. Barriers and facilitators to starting insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69(10):1050–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kunt T, Snoek FJ. Barriers to insulin initiation and intensification and how to overcome them. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2009;164:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerstein HC, Bosch J, Dagenais GR, et al. Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):319–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gerstein HC, Yale JF, Harris SB, Issa M, Stewart JA, Dempsey E. A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas. The Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with Insulin Glargine for Hyperglycaemia Treatment) Study. Diabet Med. 2006;23(7):736–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ritzel R, Roussel R, Bolli GB, et al. Patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies: glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(9):859–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riddle MC, Bolli GB, Ziemen M, Muehlen-Bartmer I, Bizet F, Home PD. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2755–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yki-Jarvinen H, Bergenstal R, Ziemen M, Wardecki M, Muehlen-Bartmer I, Boelle E, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3235–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bolli GB, Riddle MC, Bergenstal RM, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(4):386–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riddle MC, Bolli GB, Home PD, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexible versus fixed dosing intervals of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(4):252–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsuhisa M, Koyama M, Cheng X, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(4):375–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zinman B, Philis-Tsimikas A, Cariou B, et al. Insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year, randomized, treat-to-target trial (BEGIN Once Long). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2464–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gough SC, Bhargava A, Jain R, Mersebach H, Rasmussen S, Bergenstal RM. Low-volume insulin degludec 200 units/ml once daily improves glycemic control similarly to insulin glargine with a low risk of hypoglycemia in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week, randomized, controlled, multinational, treat-to-target trial: the BEGIN LOW VOLUME trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2536–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Onishi Y, Iwamoto Y, Yoo SJ, Clauson P, Tamer SC, Park S. Insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week, randomized, controlled, Pan-Asian, treat-to-target trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4(6):605–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Standl E, Owen DR. New long-acting basal insulins: does benefit outweigh cost? Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Supplement 2):S172–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Terauchi Y, Koyama M, Cheng X, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(4):366–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Home PD, Bergenstal RM, Bolli GB, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 Units/mL in people with type 1 diabetes: a randomized, phase 3a, open-label clinical trial (EDITION 4). Diabetes Care. 2015;38(12):2217–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Garber AJ, King AB, Del Prato S, et al. Insulin degludec, an ultra-longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 2): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9825):1498–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Polinski JM, Smith BF, Curtis BH, et al. Barriers to insulin progression among patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39(1):53–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(1):40–53. Scholar
  35. 35.
    Al Hamarneh YN, Charrois T, Lewanczuk R, Tsuyuki RT. Pharmacist intervention for glycaemic control in the community (the RxING study). BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003154.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Furler J, O’Neal D, Speight J, et al. Supporting insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes in primary care: results of the Stepping Up pragmatic cluster randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ. 2017;356:j783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kovacs Burns K, Nicolucci A, Holt RI, et al. Diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs second study (DAWN2): cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30(7):778–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Peyrot M, Burns KK, Davies M, et al. Diabetes attitudes wishes and needs 2 (DAWN2): a multinational, multi-stakeholder study of psychosocial issues in diabetes and person-centred diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99(2):174–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Funnell MM. Overcoming barriers to the initiation of insulin therapy. Clin Diabetes. 2007;25(1):36–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Meece J. Dispelling myths and removing barriers about insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2006;32(1 Suppl):9S–18S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Skovlund SE, Peyrot M. The diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) program: a new approach to improving outcomes of diabetes care. Diabetes Spect. 2005;18(3):136–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Polonsky WH, Jackson RA. What’s so tough about taking insulin? Addressing the problem of psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22(3):147–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, Villa-Caballero L, Edelman SV. Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: the scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2543–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Davies MJ, Gagliardino JJ, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Mohan V, Hughes R. Real-world factors affecting adherence to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2013;30(5):512–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Karter AJ, Subramanian U, Saha C, et al. Barriers to insulin initiation: the translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):733–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lebovitz HE. Type 2 diabetes: an overview. Clin Chem. 1999;45(8 Pt 2):1339–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HAW. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kostev K, Dippel FW, Rathmann W. Risk of hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes patients under different insulin regimens: a primary care database analysis. Ger Med Sci. 2015;12(13):Doc01.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Edelman SV. Identifying the worries and concerns about hypoglycemia in adults with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complic. 2015;29(8):1171–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vallis M, Jones A, Pouwer F. Managing hypoglycemia in diabetes may be more fear management than glucose management: a practical guide for diabetes care providers. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2014;10(6):364–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Clayton D, Woo V, Yale J-F. Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada: hypoglycemia. Can J Diabetes 2013;37(suppl 1):S69–71.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Harper W, Clement M, Goldenberg R, et al. Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada: pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2013;37(suppl 1):S61–68.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(5):1384–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sorli C, Heile MK. Identifying and meeting the challenges of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014;7:267–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Polonsky WH, Arsenault J, Fisher L, et al. Initiating insulin: how to help people with type 2 diabetes start and continue insulin successfully. Int J Clin Pract. 2017. Scholar
  57. 57.
    Arnolds S, Heise T, Flacke F, Sieber J. Common standards of basal insulin titration in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(3):771–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sabourin BC, Pursley S. Psychosocial issues in diabetes self-management: strategies for healthcare providers. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37(1):36–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Davies M, Storms F, Shutler S, Bianchi-Biscay M, Gomis R. Improvement of glycemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: comparison of two treatment algorithms using insulin glargine. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1282–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Blonde L, Merilainen M, Karwe V, Raskin P. Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets—the TITRATE study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11(6):623–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Meneghini L, Koenen C, Weng W, Selam JL. The usage of a simplified self-titration dosing guideline (303 Algorithm) for insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes–results of the randomized, controlled PREDICTIVE 303 study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9(6):902–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Philis-Tsimikas A, Brod M, Niemeyer M, Ocampo Francisco AM, Rothman J. Insulin degludec once-daily in type 2 diabetes: simple or step-wise titration (BEGIN: once simple use). Adv Ther. 2013;30(6):607–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Berard L, Harris SB, Yale J-F, Groleau M, Javadi P, Stewart J. Safety and efficacy of a pragmatic self-titration 1 unit/day (INSIGHT) algorithm for insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300). Can J Diabetes. 2016;40(5):S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yale JF, Berard L, Groleau M, Javadi P, Stewart J, Harris SB. TITRATION: a randomized study to assess 2 treatment algorithms with new insulin glargine 300 units/ml. Can J Diabetes. 2017;41(5):478–84. Scholar
  65. 65.
    Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational global attitudes of patients and physicians in insulin therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(5):682–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Berard L, Bonnemaire M, Mical M, Edelman S. Insights into optimal basal insulin titration in type 2 diabetes: results of a quantitative survey. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):301–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Owens DR, Matfin G, Monnier L. Basal insulin analogues in the management of diabetes mellitus: what progress have we made? Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30(2):104–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    TOUJEO™SoloSTAR® Product Monograph May 28, 2015.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
  70. 70.
    Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, et al. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:723–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Heise T, Nosek L, Bottcher SG, Hastrup H, Haahr H. Ultra-long-acting insulin degludec has a flat and stable glucose-lowering effect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(10):944–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lajara R, Cengiz E, Tanenberg RJ. The role of the new basal insulin analogs in addressing unmet clinical needs in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(6):1045–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bramlage P, Bluhmki T, Fleischmann H, et al. Determinants of weight change in patients on basal insulin treatment: an analysis of the DIVE registry. BMJ. 2017;5(1):e000301.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Garber AJ. Will the next generation of basal insulins offer clinical advantages? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(6):483–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Owens DR. Clinical evidence for the earlier initiation of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15:776–85.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Steinstraesser A, Schmidt R, Bergmann K, Dahmen R, Becker RH. Investigational new insulin glargine 300 U/ml has the same metabolism as insulin glargine 100 U/ml. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(9):873–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Goldman J, Kapitza C, Pettus J, Heise T. Understanding how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences of basal analog insulins influence clinical practice. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(10):1821–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    de Galan BE. Insulin glargine 300 U/mL in the management of diabetes: clinical utility and patient perspectives. Patient Prefer Adher. 2016;10:2097–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Becker RH, Dahmen R, Bergmann K, Lehmann A, Jax T, Heise T. New insulin glargine 300 units. mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 units. mL-1. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):637–43. Scholar
  80. 80.
    Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, et al. Design of DEVOTE (trial comparing cardiovascular safety of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events) - DEVOTE 1. Am Heart J. 2016;179:175–83. Scholar
  81. 81.
    Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians? Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):600–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Blonde L, Merilainen M, Karwe V, Raskin P, Group TS. Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets—the TITRATETM study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11(6):623–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. The treat-to-target trial. Randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3080–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yki-Jarvinen H, Kauppinen-Makelin R, Tiikkainen M, et al. Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study. Diabetologia. 2006;49(3):442–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Harris S, Yale JF, Dempsey E, Gerstein H. Can family physicians help patients initiate basal insulin therapy successfully? Randomized trial of patient-titrated insulin glargine compared with standard oral therapy: lessons for family practice from the Canadian INSIGHT trial. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(4):550–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Meneghini L, Atkin SL, Gough SC, et al. The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given in variable once-daily dosing intervals compared with insulin glargine and insulin degludec dosed at the same time daily: a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):858–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Partners HealthCare. Partners guidelines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the non-pregnant adult. Partners Healthcare; 2012.
  88. 88.
    Staples H, Yale JF. Starting Insulin. Booklet based on INSIGHT Study conducted 2002–2004. Aventis Pharma.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Glasgow Diabetes Managed Clinical Network. Guidelines for insulin initiation and adjustment in primary care in patients with type 2 diabetes: for the guidance of diabetes specialist nurses. Greater Glasgow and Clyde: NHS; 2010.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Heise T, Meneghini LF. Insulin stacking versus therapeutic accumulation: understanding the differences. Endocr Pract. 2014;20(1):75–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37:S1–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Appendix 3: Examples of insulin initiation and titration regimens in people with type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2013;37:S200–S1.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Bergenstal RM, Johnson M, Powers MA, et al. Adjust to target in type 2 diabetes: comparison of a simple algorithm with carbohydrate counting for adjustment of mealtime insulin glulisine. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(7):1305–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Buse JB, Wolffenbuttel BH, Herman WH, et al. The DURAbility of basal versus lispro mix 75/25 insulin Efficacy (DURABLE) trial: comparing the durability of lispro mix 75/25 and glargine. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):249–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Kennedy L, Herman WH, Strange P, Harris A. Impact of active versus usual algorithmic titration of basal insulin and point-of-care versus laboratory measurement of HbA1c on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Glycemic Optimization with algorithms and labs at Point of Care (GOAL A1C) trial. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Charbonnel B, DeFronzo R, Davidson J, et al. Pioglitazone use in combination with insulin in the prospective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events study (PROactive19). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(5):2163–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Arnolds S, Dellweg S, Clair J, et al. Further improvement in postprandial glucose control with addition of exenatide or sitagliptin to combination therapy with insulin glargine and metformin: a proof-of-concept study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1509–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
  99. 99.
    Leiter LA, Berard L, Bowering CK, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus management in Canada: is it improving? Can J Diabetes. 2013;37(2):82–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lori Berard
    • 1
  • Noreen Antonishyn
    • 2
  • Kathryn Arcudi
    • 3
  • Sarah Blunden
    • 4
  • Alice Cheng
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Ronald Goldenberg
    • 8
  • Stewart Harris
    • 9
  • Shelley Jones
    • 10
  • Upender Mehan
    • 11
    • 12
  • James Morrell
    • 13
  • Robert Roscoe
    • 14
  • Rick Siemens
    • 15
  • Michael Vallis
    • 16
    • 17
  • Jean-François Yale
    • 18
  1. 1.Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Winnipeg Diabetes Research GroupHealth Sciences CentreWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of EndocrinologyAlberta Health ServicesEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Diabetes ClinicThe Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre (Lakeshore General Hospital)Pointe-ClaireCanada
  4. 4.Diabetes EducationLMC Diabetes and EndocrinologyMontrealCanada
  5. 5.Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismSt. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Trillium Health PartnersCredit Valley HospitalMississaugaCanada
  7. 7.Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  8. 8.LMC Diabetes and EndocrinologyThornhillCanada
  9. 9.Department of Family MedicineWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  10. 10.Horizon Health NetworkMonctonCanada
  11. 11.The Centre for Family MedicineKitchenerCanada
  12. 12.Department of Family MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  13. 13.Diabetes ServicesIsland HealthVictoriaCanada
  14. 14.Diabetes Education CentreSaint John Regional HospitalSaint JohnCanada
  15. 15.London Drugs PharmacyLethbridgeCanada
  16. 16.Behaviour Change InstituteNova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifaxCanada
  17. 17.Department of Family MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  18. 18.Department of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations