Advertisement

Wetlands

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Impact of Peatland Restoration on Soil Microbial Activity and Nematode Communities

  • Lenka BobuľskáEmail author
  • Lenka Demková
  • Andrea Čerevková
  • Marek Renčo
Wetlands Restoration

Abstract

Urban and industrial developments were the reason for draining peatlands in the past which caused changes in their ecology. Restoration of the water regime aims to bring back their original functions. This study examines the natural recovery of peatland following re-wetting, blocking the drainage ditches. We used soil microbial activity, physicochemical properties and nematode communities as indicator taxa to describe restoration status five years after management. Data were compared to those obtained from adjacent degraded forest and meadow like habitats of former peatlands. Our results indicate that re-wetting had considerable effect to soil indices and nematodes. Soil moisture and organic carbon significantly increased, while pH has not changed. In contrast, soil enzymatic activity significantly decreased after re-wetting in the restored part of the peatland compared to the degraded habitats. These conditions were probably less favourable for small metazoans, because of their abundance; species number and diversity were significantly decreased after re-wetting management. The nematode trophic structure was also significantly degraded; the restored part of peatland had less omnivore and predators as well as plant parasites. We conclude that in respect to both biological indicators and basic soil properties analysed, blocking of drainage ditches creates capable conditions for natural peatland restoration.

Keywords

Peatland Regeneration Carbon sequestration Microbial activity Nematode Indicators 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was financially covered by the project of Slovak scientific agency VEGA No. 2/0013/16.

References

  1. Abebe E, Andrássy I, Traunspurger W (2006) Freshwater nematodes, ecology and taxonomy. CABI Publishing, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkorta I, Aizpurua A, Riga P, Albizu I, Amegaza I, Gabrisu C (2003) Soil enzyme activities as biological indicators of soil health. Reviews on Environmental Health 18:65–73PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrássy I (2005) Free-living nematodes of Hungary (Nematoda errantia), Volume I. Hungarian Natural History Museum and Systematic Zoology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrássy I (2007) Free-living nematodes of Hungary (Nematoda errantia), volume II. Hungarian Natural History Museum and Systematic Zoology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrássy I (2009) Free-living nematodes of Hungary (Nematoda errantia), volume III. Hungarian Natural History Museum and Systematic Zoology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  7. Baddam R, Reddy GB, Raczkowski C, Cyrus JS (2016) Activity of soil enzymes in constructed wetlands treated with swine wastewater. Ecological Engineering 91:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besasie NJ, Buckley ME (2012) Carbon sequestration potential at central Wiskonsin wetland reserve program sites. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76(5):1904–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobuľská L, Fazekašová D, Angelovičová L, Kotorová D (2015a) Impact of ecological and conventional farming systems on chemical and biological soil quality indices in a cold mountain climate in Slovakia. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 31(3):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bobuľská L, Fazekašová D, Angelovičová L (2015b) Vertical profiles of soil properties and microbial activities in peatbog soils in Slovakia. Environmental Processes 2(2):411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bongers T (1990) The maturity index: an ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83:14–19PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Boulogne I, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Merciris P, Vaillant J, Labonte L, Loranger-Merciris G (2016) Soil chemical and biological characteristics influence mineralization processes in different stands of a tropical wetland. Soil Use and Management 32(3):269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of north American wetlands. Wetland 26:889–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brzeski MW (1998) Nematodes of Tylenchida in Poland and temperate Europe. Museum of Institute of zoology. Polish Academy of Sciences, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  15. Caldwell BA (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia 49:637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cesarz S, Ciobanu M, Wright AJ, Ebeling A, Vogel A, Weisser WW, Eisenhauer N (2017) Plant species richness sustains higher trophic levels of soil nematode communities after consecutive environmental perturbations. Oecologia 184:715–728PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen H, Popovich S, McEuen A, Briddell B (2017) Carbon and nitrogen storage of a restored wetland at Illinois´ Emiquon preserve: potential for carbon sequestration. Hydrobiologia 804(1):139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cobb NA (1918) Estimating the nematode population of the soil. Agric tech Circ bur Pl Ind US dep Agric no.1Google Scholar
  19. Corstanje R, Reddy KR, Prenger JP, Newman S, Ogram AV (2007) Soil microbial eco-physiological response to nutrient enrichment in a sub-tropical wetland. Ecological Indicators 7:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dráždil T, Stanová V (2012) Ekologická obnova rašelinísk pri Spišskej Belej. DAPHNE – Inštitút aplikovanej ekológie, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  21. Drenovsky RE, Feris KP, Batten KM, Hristova K (2008) New and current microbiological tools for ecosystem ecologist: towards a goal of linking structure and function. The American Midland Naturalist 160:140–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunger W (1964) Tiere im boden (No. 631.46). Wittenberg, LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn CH, Jones TG, Girard A, Freeman CH (2014) Methodologies for extracellular enzyme assays from wetland soils. Wetlands 34:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edokpa DA, Evans MG, Allott TEH, Pilkington M, Rothwell JJ (2017) Peatland restoration and the dynamics of dissolved nitrogen in upland freshwater. Ecological Engineering 106:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1988) Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 20:601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fennessy S, Jacobs A, Kentula M (2007) An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands. Wetlands 27:504–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferris H, Bongers T, de Goede RGM (2001) A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Applied Soil Ecology 18:13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fiala K et al (1999) Partial monitoring system – soil. Binding methods VÚPOP, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  29. Fierer N, Jackson JA, Vilgalys R, Jackson RB (2005) Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71:4117–4120PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Green VS, Stott DE, Diack M (2006) Assay for fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity: optimization for soil samples. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenway H, Armstrong W, Colmer TD (2006) Conditions leading to high CO2 (>5 kPa) in waterlogged-flooded soils and possible effects on root growth and metabolism. Annals of Botany 98:9–32PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grejtovský A (1991) Influence of soil improvers on enzymatic activity of heavy alluvial soil. Plant, Soil and Environment 37:289–295Google Scholar
  33. Grootjans AP, Alserda A, Bekker RE, Janáková M, Kemmers RF, Madaras M, Stanova V, Ripka J, Van Delft B, Wolejko L (2005) Calcareous spring mires in Slovakia; jewels in the crown of the mire kingdom. Stapfia 85:97–115Google Scholar
  34. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistic software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologicia Electronica 4:9Google Scholar
  35. Heink U, Kowarik I (2010) What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. Ecological Indicators 10(3):584–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Higgins RP, Thiel H (1988) Introduction to the study of Meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  37. Hill BH, Elonen CM, Jicha TM, Bolgrien DW, Moffett MF (2010) Sediment microbial enzyme activity as an indicator of nutrient limitation in the great rivers of the upper Mississippi river basin. Biogeochemistry 97:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoschitz M, Kaufmann R (2004) Nematode community composition in five alpine habitats. Nematology 6:737–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inglett PW, Inglett KS (2013) Biogeochemical changes during early developmental of restored calcareous wetland soils. Geoderma 192:132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Islam KR, Weil RR (2000) Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 19(1):9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Khaziev FK (1976) Soil enzyme activity. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  42. Knox SH, Sturtevant C, Matthes JH, Koteen L, Verfaillie J, Baldocchi D (2015) Agricultural peatland restoration: effects of land-use change on greenhouse gas (CO2 and CH4) fluxes in the Sacramento-san Joaquin Delta. Global Change Biology 21(2):750–765PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kong L, Wang YB, Zhao LN, Chen ZH (2009) Enzyme and root activities in surface-flow constructed wetlands. Chemosphere 76:601–608PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Kozulin AV, Tanovitskaya NI, Vershitskaya IN (2010) Methodical recommendations for ecological rehabilitation of damaged mires and prevention of disturbances to the hydrological regime of mire ecosystems in the process of drainage. Scientific and Practical Center for Bio Resources Institute for Nature Management of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, BelarusGoogle Scholar
  45. Lavelle P, Spain AV (2001) Soil ecology, second edition. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lin X, Green S, Tfaily MM, Prakash O, Konstantinidis KT, Corbett JE, Chanton JP, Cooper WT, Kostka JE (2012) Microbial community structure and activity linked to contrasting biogeochemical gradients in bog and fen environments of the glacial lake Agassiz peatland. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78:7023–7031PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Loof PAA (1999) Nematoda: Adenophorea (Dorylaimida). Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  48. Mandic-Mulec I, Ausec L, Danevčič T, Levičnik-Höfferle Š, Jerman V, Kraigher B (2014) Microbial community structure and function in peat soil. Food Technology and Biotechnology 52(2):180–187Google Scholar
  49. Meyl A. (1960) Die freilebenden Erd- und Süsswasser-nematoden (Fadenwürmer) in Tierwelt Mitteleuropas. 1 Band, Lief 5a Verlag Quelle un Mayer, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  50. Niering W (1985) Wetlands. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Pang BL, Cui LJ, Ma MY, Li W (2014) Carbon sequestration service valuation of Zhalong wetland ecosystem. Ecology. 33(8):2078–2083Google Scholar
  52. Patterson L, Cooper DJ (2007) The use of hydrologic and ecological indicators for the restoration of drainage ditches and water diversions in a mountain fen, Cascade range, California. Wetlands 27:290–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Renčo M, Murín J (2013) Soil nematode assemblages in natural European peatlands of the Horná Orava protected landscape area, Slovakia. Wetlands 33:459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Renčo M, Čerevková A, Homolová Z, Gömöryová E (2015) Long-term effects on soil nematode community structure in spruce forests of removing or not removing fallen trees after a windstorm. Forest Ecology and Management 356:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rokosch AE, Bouchard V, Fennessy S, Dick R (2009) The use of soil parameters as indicators of quality in forested depressional wetlands. Wetlands 29(2):666–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Šály A (1983) Free living nematodes in the Slovak Socialistic Republic. Veda, SAV, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  57. Schloter M, O’Dilly JC, Munch JC (2003) Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 98:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seinhorst JW (1962) On the killing, fixation and transferring to glycerine of nematodes. Nematologica 8:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Senga Y, Hiroki M, Terui S, Nohara S (2015) Variation in microbial function through soil depth profiles in the Kushiro wetland, North-Eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Ecological Research 30:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shackle VJ, Freeman C, Reynolds B (2000) Carbon supply and the regulation of enzyme activity in constructed wetlands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32:1935–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  62. Shao X, Yang W, Wu M (2015) Seasonal dynamics of soil labile organic carbon and enzyme activities in relation to vegetation types in Hangzhou Bay tidal flat wetland. PLoS One 10(11):e0142677PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sheng H, Yang Y, Yang Z, Chen G, Xie J, Guo J, Zou S (2010) The dynamics response of soil respiration to land-use changes in subtropical China. Global Change Biology 16(3):1107–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shi WY, Du S, Morina JC, Guan JH, Wang KB, Ma MG, Yamanaka N, Tateno R (2017) Physical and biochemical controls on soil respiration along a topographical gradient in a semiarid forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 247:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sieriebriennikov B, Ferris H, de Goede RGM (2014) NINJA: an automated calculation system for nematode -based biological monitoring. European Journal of Soil Biology 61:90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sinsabaugh RI, Antibus RK, Linkins AE, McClaugherty CA, Rayburn LD, Weiland RT (1993) Wood composition: nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in relation to extracellular enzyme activity. Ecology 74:1586–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Skwiercz A (1989) Predatory nematodes (Nematoda: Mononchoidea) in the peat soils in Poland. Fragmenta Faunistica 30:331–339Google Scholar
  68. Sousa RF, Brasil EPF, Figueiredo CC, Leandro WM (2015) Soil microbial biomass and activity in wetlands located in preserved and disturbed environments in the Cerrado biome. Bioscience Journal 31(4):1049–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2012) Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination. Version 5. Microcomputer power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  70. Tian L, Zhao L, Wu X, Fang H, Yue G, Liu G, Chen H (2017) Vertical patterns and controls of soil nutrients in alpine grassland: implication for nutrient uptake. Science of Total Environment 607-608:855–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tianzhu L, Guicai S, Jian W, Grengxin Z (2017) Microbial communities and associated enzyme activities in alpine wetlands with increasing altitude in the Tibetan plateau. Wetlands 37(3):401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tscherko D, Rustemeier J, Richter A, Wanek W, Kandeler E (2003) Functional diversity of the soil microflora in primary succession across two glacier forelands in the Central Alps. European Journal of Soil Science 54:685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Van Benzoijen J (2006) Methods and techniques for nematology. Wagenningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  74. Waldrop MP, Balser TC, Firestone MK (2000) Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32:1837–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang WJ, Dalal RC, Moody PW, Smith CJ (2003) Relationships of soil respiration to microbial biomass, substrate availability and clay content. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35(2):273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wasilewska L (1997) Soil invertebrates as bioindicators, with special reference to soil inhabiting nematodes. Russian Journal of Nematology 5:113–126Google Scholar
  77. Weaver MA, Zablotowicz RM, Krutz LJ, Bryson CHT, Locke M (2012) Microbial and vegetative changes associated with development of a constructed wetland. Ecological Indicators 13:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson MJ, Khakouli-Duarte T (2009) Nematodes as environmental indicators. CABI, OxfordshireCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Worrall F, Armstrong A, Holden J (2007) Short-term impact of peat drain-blocking on water color, dissolved organic carbon concentration, and water table depth. Journal of Hydrology 337:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yeates GW (1994a) Effects of plants on nematode community structure. Annual Review of Phytopathology 37:127–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yeates GW (1994b) Modification and qualification of the nematode maturity index. Pedobiologia 38:97–101Google Scholar
  82. Yeates GW, Bongers T, de Goede RGM, Freckman DW, Georgieva SS (1993) Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera: outline for soil ecologists. Journal of Nematology 25:315–331PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Yeates GW, Ferris H, Moens T, van der Putten WH (2009) The role of nematodes in ecosystems. In: Wilson MJ, Kakouli-Duarte T (eds) Nematodes as environmental indicators. CABI, Oxfordshire, pp 1–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lenka Bobuľská
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lenka Demková
    • 1
  • Andrea Čerevková
    • 2
  • Marek Renčo
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences, Department of EcologyUniversity of PrešovPrešovSlovakia
  2. 2.Institute of Parasitology, Department of Environmental and Plant ParasitologySlovak Academy of ScienceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations