Survival of Planktonic and Sessile Cells of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus reuteri upon Exposure to Simulated Fasting-State Gastrointestinal Conditions
In this study, we report on the formation and resilience of Lactobacillus reuteri HFI-LD5 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus HFI-K2 biofilms cultivated in a CO2 evolution measurement system (CEMS) and exposed to biologically relevant, fasting-state gastrointestinal fluids under continuous flow conditions. For comparative purposes, planktonic and sessile populations of L. reuteri HFI-LD5 and L. rhamnosus HFI-K2 were each exposed to fasting-state gastric fluid (FSGF, pH 2.0) for 2 h, fasting-state intestinal fluid (FSIF, pH 7.5) for 6 h, and simulated colonic fluid (SCoF, pH 7.0) for 24 h. Planktonic cell numbers of L. reuteri HFI-LD5 declined from 6.6 log10 CFU/mL to 3.2 log10 CFU/mL and L. rhamnosus HFI-K2 from 6.6 log10 CFU/mL to undetectable levels after exposure to FSGF. Limited loss in viability was observed when free-floating cells were exposed to FSIF and SCoF. Sessile populations of both strains survived and recovered from the sequential exposure to all three gastric fluids despite observed detachment of biofilm biomass and a temporary decrease in metabolic activity to below detection limits, as recorded by changes in whole-biofilm CO2 production rates. The planktonic cell-focused gut microbiome-related research has most likely caused an underestimation in the overall survival ability of microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract. Sessile cells of L. reuteri HFI-LD5 were metabolically inactive when exposed to gastric (FSGF) and intestinal (FSIF) fluids, suggesting that biofilms are formed in the small intestinal tract as survival mechanism. In the case of L. rhamnosus HFI-K2, cells were released from biofilms when suddenly exposed to pH 2.0.
KeywordsL. rhamnosus L. reuteri Biofilms Simulated fasting-state gastrointestinal conditions
This research is funded by The National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Wallace TC (2015) Dietary supplements in health promotion. CRC Press, Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
- 9.FAO/WHO working group (2001) Report of the joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria, Córdoba, Argentina, 1–4 October (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)Google Scholar
- 13.Minekus M, Alminger M, Alvito P, Ballance S, Bohn T, Bourlieu C, Carrière F, Boutrou R, Corredig M, Dupont D, Dufour C, Egger L, Golding M, Karakaya S, Kirkhus B, Le Feunteun S, Lesmes U, Macierzanka A, Mackie A, Marze S, McClements DJ, Ménard O, Recio I, Santos CN, Singh RP, Vegarud GE, Wickham MS, Weitschies W, Brodkorb A (2014) A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food—an international consensus. Food Funct 5:1113–1124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Probert HM, Gibson GR (2002) Bacterial biofilms in the human gastrointestinal tract. Issues Intest Microbiol 3:23–27Google Scholar
- 40.Salminen S (2012) Lactic acid bacteria: microbiological and functional aspects. (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis)Google Scholar
- 46.Aoudia N, Rieu A, Briandet R, Deschamps J, Chluba J, Jego G, Garrido C, Guzzo J (2016) Biofilms of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus fermentum: effect on stress responses, antagonistic effects on pathogen growth and immunomodulatory properties. Food Microbiol 53:51–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Jones SE, Versalovic J (2009) Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiol 9:1471–2180Google Scholar
- 51.Frese SA, Benson AK, Tannock GW, Loach DM, Kim J, Zhang M, Oh PL, Heng NCK, Patil PB, Juge N, MacKenzie DA, Pearson BM, Lapidus A, Dalin E, Tice H, Goltsman E, Land M, Hauser L, Ivanova N, Kyrpides NC, Walter J (2011) The evolution of host specialization in the vertebrate gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri. PLoS Genet 7:e1001314CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 52.Walter J, Chagnaud P, Tannock GW, Loach DM, Bello FD, Jenkinson HF, Hammes WP, Hertel C (2005) A high-molecular-mass surface protein (Lsp) and methionine sulfoxide reductase B (MsrB) contribute to the ecological performance of Lactobacillus reuteri in the murine gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:979–986CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 53.Walter J, Schwab C, Loach DM, Gänzle MG, Tannock GW (2008) Glucosyltransferase A (GtfA) and inulosucrase (Inu) of Lactobacillus reuteri TMW1.106 contribute to cell aggregation, in vitro biofilm formation, and colonization of the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Microbiology 154:72–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar