Food Security

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 255–279 | Cite as

Does consumption of tobacco and alcohol affect household food security? Evidence from rural India

  • Jaya JumraniEmail author
  • P. S. Birthal
Original Paper


Using a nationally representative household-level dataset on consumption expenditure, this paper examines the crowding-out effects of tobacco and alcohol spending on food and non-food consumption in rural India. We found a positive relationship between spending on these temptation goods and household income, but in proportionate terms the poor and socially-disadvantaged households spent more on such goods compared to others. In general, their consumption crowded out food expenditure but not as much as non-food expenditure. Tobacco expenditure crowded out more of consumer durables followed by foodgrains, healthcare and education. However, among the poor, foodgrains were traded-off more. Likewise, spending on alcohol also crowded out foodgrains, but the effects were larger for consumer durables and starker among the poor. Across social groups too, consumption of tobacco as well as alcohol led to a reallocation of budgets with consumer durables being most displaced followed by foodgrains. On the whole, the crowding out effects were larger for tobacco than alcohol and were greater for households belonging to the lower rungs of both income and social order. We identified that such crowding-out effects operated through peer effects or social interactions; hence the key inference is that government interventions aimed towards controlling tobacco or alcohol consumption would be more effective if these targeted peer groups and their group leaders.


Tobacco Alcohol Food security Rural India 



We would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments. We are grateful to Jeffrey Wooldridge, J.M.C Santos Silva, Rijo M. John, Bharat Ramaswami, Devesh Roy and Digvijay S. Negi for their valuable suggestions. The assistance received from Vister Joshi is also appreciated. We also acknowledge the valuable support of staff of ICAR-NIAP. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of their organization while errors or omissions are the sole responsibility of authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. We further wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. The manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property.

Supplementary material

12571_2017_660_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (311 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 390 kb)


  1. Akerlof, G. (1997). Social Distance and Social Decisions. Econometrica, 65(5), 1005–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, P., & Baumberg, B. (2006). Alcohol in Europe – A public health perspective. A report for the European Commission. England: Institute of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2007). The Economic Lives of the Poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 141–167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A., & Mullainathan, S. (2010). The shape of temptation: implications for the economic lives of the poor. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), May 2010, Working Paper No. 15973.Google Scholar
  5. Banks, J., Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (1997). Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bask, M., & Melkersson, M. (2004). Rationally addicted to drinking and smoking. Applied Economics, 36, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouregois, J. C., & Barnes, J. G. (1979). Does advertising increase alcohol consumption? Journal of Advertising Research, 19(4), 19–29.Google Scholar
  8. Browning, M., & Meghir, C. (1991). The effects of male and female labour supply on commodity demands. Econometrica, 59(4), 925–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chelwa, G., & Walbeek, C. (2014). Assessing the causal impact of tobacco expenditure on household spending patterns in Zambia. Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA) working paper 453, August 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Curran, P. J., Stice, E., & Chassin, L. (1997). The relation between adolescent alcohol use and peer alcohol use: A longitudinal random coefficients model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(1), 130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Deaton, A., & Subramanian, S. (1996). The Demand for Food and Calories. Journal of Political Economy, 104(1), 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decker S. L., & Schwartz A. E. (2000). Cigarettes and alcohol: substitutes or complements? NBER Working Paper 7535.Google Scholar
  13. Efroymson, D., Ahmed, A., Townsend, J., Alam, S. M., Dey, A. R., Saha, R., Dhar, B., Sujon, A. I., Ahmed, K. U., & Rahman, O. (2001). Hungry for tobacco: an analysis of the economic impact of tobacco consumption on the poor in Bangladesh. Tobacco Control, 10, 212–217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fanelli, L., & Mazzocchi, M. (2004). Back to the future? Habits and forward-looking behaviour for UK alcohol and tobacco demand. MIMEO: Università degli Studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
  15. Gaviria, A., & Raphael, S. (2001). School-based peer effects and juvenile behaviour. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goel, R. K., & Morey, M. J. (1995). The interdependence of cigarette and liquor demand. Southern Economic Journal, 2(2), 451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. John, R. M. (2008). Crowding out effect of tobacco expenditure and its implications on household resource allocation in India. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 66(6), 1356–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, A. M. (1989). A systems approach to the demand for alcohol and tobacco. Bulletin of Economic Research, 41(2), 85–106.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, A., & Mazzi, M. (1996). Tobacco consumption and taxation in Italy: an application of the QUAIDS model. Applied Economics, 28, 595–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kang, H. Y., Kim, H. K., Park, T. K., Jee, S. H., Nam, C. M., & Park, H. W. (2003). Economic burden of smoking in Korea. Tobacco Control, 12, 37–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Koch, S. F., & Tshiswaka-Kashalala, G. (2008). Tobacco substitution and the poor. University of Pretoria Working Paper Series no. 2008–32.Google Scholar
  22. Kremer, M., & Levy, D. (2008). Peer effects and alcohol use among college students. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laibson, D. (2001). A Cue-Theory of Consumption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 81–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, Y., Rao, K., Hu, T. W., Sun, Q., & Mao, Z. (2006). Cigarette smoking and poverty in China. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2784–2790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341(6149), 976–980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Max, W., Rice, D. P., Sung, H. Y., Zhang, X., & Miller, L. (2004). The economic burden of smoking in California. Tobacco Control, 13, 264–267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Norton, E. C., Lindrooth, R. C., & Ennett, S. T. (1998). Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. Health Economics, 7, 439–453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. NSSO (National Sample Survey Office). (2013). Consumption Expenditure Survey, 68th Round (2011–12), CD, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.Google Scholar
  29. Pollak, R. A. (1969). Conditional demand functions and consumption theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83(1), 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell, L. M., Tauras, J. A., & Ross, H. (2005). The importance of peer effects, cigarette prices and tobacco control policies for youth smoking behaviour. Journal of Health Economics, 24, 950–968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pu, C., Lan, V., Chou, Y.-J., & Lan, C. (2008). The crowding-out effects of tobacco and alcohol where expenditure shares are low: Analyzing expenditure data for Taiwan. Social Science and Medicine, 9, 1979–1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reifman, A., Barnes, G. M., Dintcheff, B. A., Farrell, M. P., & Uhteg, L. (1998). Parental and peer influences on the onset of heavier drinking among adolescents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 311–317. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sacks, J. J., Roeber, J., Bouchery, E. E., Gonzales, K., Chaloupka, F. J., & Brewer, R. (2013). State costs of excessive alcohol consumption, 2006. Am J Preventive Med., 45, 474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Su, S., & Yen, S. (2000). A Censored System of Cigarette and Alcohol Consumption. Applied Economics, 32, 729–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tauchmann, H., Göhlmann, S., Requate, T., & Schmidt, C. M. (2006) Tobacco and alcohol: complements or substitutes? - A statistical guinea pig approach. RWI Discussion Paper No. 52.Google Scholar
  36. Thamarangsi, T. (2006). Thailand: Alcohol today. Addiction, 101, 783–787.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson, G. W., Wilson, N. A., O’Dea, D., Reid, P. J., & Howden-Chapman, P. (2002). Tobacco spending and children in low income households. Tobacco Control, 11(4), 372–375.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Vermeulen, F. (2003). Do smokers behave differently? A tale of zero expenditures and separability concepts. Economics Bulletin, 4(6), 1–7.Google Scholar
  39. Wang, H., Sindelar, J. L., & Busch, S. H. (2006). The impact of tobacco expenditure on household consumption patterns in rural China. Social Science & Medicine, 62(6), 1414–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warner, E. K. (2014). Death and taxes: using the latter to reduce the former. Tobacco Control, 23, i4–i6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. WHO (World Health Organization). (2014a). Tobacco control economics.
  42. WHO (World Health Organization). (2014b). Global status report on alcohol and health. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  43. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Yao, T., Huang, J., Sung, H., Ong, M. K., Mao, Z., Jiang, Y., Fong, G. T., & Wendy, M. (2014). Determinants of smoking-induced deprivation in China. Tobacco Control. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051542.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and International Society for Plant Pathology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations