Skip to main content
Log in

Task Assignment for Deploying Unmanned Aircraft as Decoys

  • Robot and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a task assignment based on auction algorithm for a decoy mission using multiple UAVs which can hover against anti-ship missiles. An optimal deployment direction of decoys are also decided based on the cost function that is calculated with the expected signal power of a seeker and decoy, the distance between them, and fuel availability of the decoys. A simple kinematics is considered to generate two-dimensional motions of anti-ship missiles and a target ship. Numerical simulations are conducted under a visualization environment and validate the performance of the proposed algorithm. A parametric study is also conducted for the decoy mission with multiple missiles and decoys. Lastly, non-linear simulations for ducted fan Unmanned Aerial vehicles (UAVs) are performed to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed high-level task assignment comment for the decoy mission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Sakurama, Y. Kosaka,and S.-I. Nishida, “Formation control of swarm robots with multiple proximity distance sensors,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 16–26, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. V. Cowlagi, J. P. Sperry, and J. C. Griffin, “Unmanned aerial vehicle trajectory optimization for executing intelligent tasks,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1389–1396, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H.-S. Shin and P. Segui-Gasco, “UAV Swarms: Decision-making paradigms,” Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp. 1–13, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470686652.eae273

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Xue, C. Sun, and D. C. Wunsch II, “A game-theoretical approach for a finite-time consensus of second-order multiagent system,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1071–1083, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Hu, J. Cheng, and H. Luo, “Task assignment for multi- UAV under severe uncertainty by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysiss,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Article ID 249825, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. P. Gerkey and M. J. Mataric, “A formal analysis and taxonomy of task allocation in multi-robot systems,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 939–954, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Jang, H. Shin, and A. Tsourdos, “Game-theoretical approach to heterogeneous multi-robot task assignment problem with minimum work-load requirements,” Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS), pp. 156–161, 2017.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Yoon, H. Do, and J. Kim, “Collaborative mission and route planning of multi-vehicle systems for autonomous search in marine environment,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 546–555, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Koo, S. Kim, J. Suk, Y. Kim, and J. Shin, “Improvement of shipboard landing performance of xed-wing uav using model predictive control,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2697–2708, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Jeong, B. Yu, T. Kim, S. Kim, J. Suk, and H. Oh, “Maritime application of ducted-fan flight array system: Decoy for anti-ship missile,” Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (REDUAS), pp. 72–77, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Kim and C.-K. Ryoo, “Defense strategy against multiple anti-ship missiles,” Proc. of ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference, Fukuoka International Congress Center, Japan, pp. 3635–3639, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.-R. Park and I.-H. Whang, “An effective target selection algorithm for ASM (anti-ship missile),” Proc. of SICEICASE International Joint Conference, pp. 2930–2934, 2006, Busan, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.-P. Dong, J.-G. Sun, Y. Guo, S.-M. Song, “Guidance laws against towed decoy based on adaptive back-stepping sliding mode and anti-saturation methods,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1724–1735, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. J. Kerins, “Analysis of towed decoys,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 122–1227, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Zhou, “Correlation parameters simulation for towed radar active decoy,” Proc. of International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring, Hunan, China, pp. 214–217, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.-H. Tan, Effectiveness of Off-board Active Decoys Against Anti-Shipping Missiles, Master’s thesis, Naval Post-gradate school, Manterey, California, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Arthur and M. Gerrit, “Missile avoidance maneuvres with simultaneous decoy deployment,” Proc. of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Chicago, Illinois, Aug. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Ragesh, A. Ratnoo, and D. Ghose, “Decoy launch envelopes for survivability in an interceptor-target engagement,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 667–676, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Zhai, F. He, Y. Hong, L. Wang, and Y. Yao, “Coveragebased interception algorithm of multiple interceptors against the target involving decoys,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1647–1653, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Qin and X. Wu, “Modeling and simulation on the earliest launch time of ship-to-air missile of warship formation in cooperative air-defense,” Proc. of IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China, pp. 375–379, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Pang, Y. Song, C. Zhang, H. Wang, and R. Yang, “Autonomous task allocation in a swarm of foraging robots: An approach based on response threshold sigmoid model,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1031–1040, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D.-W. Yoo, C.-H. Lee, M.-J. Tahk, and H.-L. Choi, “Optimal resource management algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicle missions in hostile territories,” Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 228, no. 12, pp. 2157–2167, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Z. Jia, J. Yu, X. Ai, X. Xu, and D. Yang, “Cooperative multiple task assignment problem with stochastic velocities and time windows for heterogeneous unmanned aerial vehicles using a genetic algorithm,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 76, pp. 112–125, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Alaa, H. Ahmed, and E. Ahmed, “Multi-robot task allocation: A review of the state-of-the-art,” Proc. of Cooperative Robots and Sensor Networks, Springer International Publishing, pp. 31–51, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. A. Ghamry, M. A. Kamel, and Y. Zhang, “Multiple UAVs in forest fire fighting mission using particle swarm optimization,” Proc. of International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Miami, FL, USA, pp. 1404–1409, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. K. Pamosoaji, M. Piao, and K.-S. Hong, “PSO-based minimum-time motion planning for multiple vehicles under acceleration and velocity limitations,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2610–2623, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. Maza, F. Caballero, J. Capitán, J. R. Martínez-de-Dios, and A. Ollero, “Simulations of repeat jamming against anti-ship missile seekers which use doppler beam sharpening modes,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2727–2732, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Z. Tang and C. Li, “Distributed event-triggered containment control for discrete-time multi-agent systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2727–2732, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Z. Tang, “Event-triggered consensus of linear discrete-time multi-agent systems with time-varying topology,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 3. pp. 1179–1185, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. M. Khamis, A. Hussein, and A. M. Elmogy, “Multirobot task allocation: A review of the state-of-the-art,” Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 604, pp. 31–51, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. Oh, J. Jeong, J. Suk, and S. Kim, “Design of a control system for an organic flight array based on a neural network controller,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 1250908, pp. 1–11, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. E. N. Johnson and M. A. Turbe, “Modelling, control, and flight testing of a small-ducted fan aircraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 769–779, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. M. Pflimlin, P. Soueres, and T. Hamel, “Position control of a ducted fan VTOL UAV in crosswind,” International Journal of Control, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 666–683, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Jiang, T. Song, and D. Lin, “Integral sliding mode based control for quadrotors with disturbances: Simulations and experiments,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1987–1998, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Shtessel, J. Buffington, and S. Banda, “Multiple time scale flight control using reconfigurable sliding modes,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 22 no. 6, pp. 87–883, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. C. I. Ahn, Y. Kim, and H. Kim, “Adaptive sliding mode controller design for fault tolerant flight control system,” Proc. of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conferences, Keystone, Colorado, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Jeong, Dynamics and Control of Ducted-fan Flight Array System, Ph.D. thesis, Chungnam National University, Korea, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Islam and N. I. Xiros, “Robust asymptotic and finitetime tracking for second-order nonlinear multi-agent autonomous systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3069–3078, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Z. Hou, J. Xu, G. Zhang, W. Wang, and C. Han, “Interaction Matrix Based Analysis and Asymptotic Cooperative Control of Multi-agent Systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1103–1115, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seungkeun Kim.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Son-Cheol Yu under the direction of Editor Chan Gook Park. This research was supported by a grant to Bio-Mimetic Robot Research Center Funded by Defense Acquisition Program Administration, and by Agency for Defense Development (UD130070ID).

Dileep M V received his B.Tech. degree in electronics and communication engineering from University of Kerala, Kerala, India in 2010, an M.Tech. degree technology in astronomy and space engineering from Manipal university, Karnataka, India in 2012. He obtained a Ph.D. degree in Optimization and control, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal University, Karnataka, India in 2017 and now working as a Post-doc researcher, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Chungnam National University, Korea. His areas of interest are control applications for UAV path planning, decision making for unmanned systems and optimization algorithms with a focus on aerospace applications.

Beomyeol Yu received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in aerospace engineering from Chungnam National Unversity (CNU), Daejeon, Korea, in 2017 and 2019, respectively. His research interests cover dynamic modeling and control for various types of unmanned aerial vehicles, neural networks, reinforcement learning, cooperative aerial transportation, and embedded system implementations.

Seungkeun Kim received his B.Sc. degree in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Seoul National University (SNU), Seoul, Korea, in 2002, and then acquired a Ph.D. degree from SNU in 2008. He is currently a professor at the Department of Aerospace Engineering, Chungnam National University, Korea. He was an associate professor and an assistant professor at the same university from 2012 to 2020. Previously, he was a research fellow and a lecturer at Cranfield University, United Kingdom from 2008 to 2012. He is interested in micro aerospace systems, aircraft guidance and control, estimation, sensor fusion, fault diagnosis, fault tolerant control, and decision making for autonomous systems.

Seungkeun Kim received his B.Sc. degree in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Seoul National University (SNU), Seoul, Korea, in 2002, and then acquired a Ph.D. degree from SNU in 2008. He is currently a professor at the Department of Aerospace Engineering, Chungnam National University, Korea. He was an associate professor and an assistant professor at the same university from 2012 to 2020. Previously, he was a research fellow and a lecturer at Cranfield University, United Kingdom from 2008 to 2012. He is interested in micro aerospace systems, aircraft guidance and control, estimation, sensor fusion, fault diagnosis, fault tolerant control, and decision making for autonomous systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dileep, M.V., Yu, B., Kim, S. et al. Task Assignment for Deploying Unmanned Aircraft as Decoys. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 18, 3204–3217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-1073-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-1073-6

Keywords

Navigation