Skip to main content
Log in

Collaborative Mission and Route Planning of Multi-vehicle Systems for Autonomous Search in Marine Environment

  • Robot and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the impact and complexity of disasters, either natural or man-made, have increased, collaborative operation of a group of unmanned vehicles attracts much attention for effective response in disaster environments. In particular, mission planning is crucial for an effective collaboration of multiple heterogeneous vehicle systems. This study presents a mission planning algorithm and its application procedure in disaster situations. In general, disaster response missions such as search, rescue, and oil spill tracking are complicated in nature and come in various forms. Therefore, the mission needs to be broken down into simpler tasks that are more readily achievable to autonomous vehicles without human intervention. This study also presents a set of algorithms for efficient initial search and task allocation. The performance and feasibility of the proposed methodologies are evaluated with numerical simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.-S. Park, M.-S. Park, and H.-W. Yang, “The optimal design scheme of an sugv for surveillance and reconnaissance missions in urban and rough terrain,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 992–999, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. R. Murphy, S. Tadokoro, and A. Kleiner, “Disaster robotics,” Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer, pp. 1577–1604, 2016.

  3. S. Tadokoro, “Earthquake disaster and expectation for robotics,” Rescue Robotics, Springer, pp. 1–16, 2009.

  4. N. Hu, S. Li, and F. Gao, “Multi-objective hierarchical optimal control for quadruped rescue robot,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1866–1877, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Meuth, E. W. Saad, D. C. Wunsch, and J. Vian, “Adaptive task allocation for search area coverage,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications, IEEE, pp. 67–74, 2009.

  6. Z. Beck, W. L. Teacy, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings, “Collaborative online planning for automated victim search in disaster response,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 100, pp. 251–266, 2018..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Song, and B. Pang, “Master-followed multiple robots cooperation slam adapted to search and rescue environment,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2593–2608, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. X. Pham, H. M. La, D. Feil-Seifer, and M. Deans, “A distributed control framework for a team of unmanned aerial vehicles for dynamic wildfire tracking,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, pp. 6648–6653, 2017.

  9. K. L. Woerner, M. R. Benjamin, and H. Schmidt, “Collaborative autonomous multi-vessel detection, bounding, and containment for maritime environmental disasters,” Proc. of OCEANS 2017-Anchorage, IEEE, pp. 1–7, 2017.

  10. L. E. Parker, “L-alliance: a mechanism for adaptive action selection in heterogeneous multi-robot teams,” ORNL/TM-13000, 1995.

  11. B. L. Brumitt and A. Stentz, “Grammps: a generalized mission planner for multiple mobile robots in unstructured environments,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 1564–1571, 1998.

  12. B. P. Gerkey and M. J. Mataric, “Sold!: Auction methods for multirobot coordination,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 758–768, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Cirillo, F. Pecora, H. Andreasson, T. Uras, and S. Koenig, “Integrated motion planning and coordination for industrial vehicles,” ICAPS, Portsmouth, NH, pp. 463–471, 2014.

  14. B. Arbanas, A. Ivanovic, M. Car, M. Orsag, T. Petrovic, and S. Bogdan, “Decentralized planning and control for uav-ugv cooperative teams,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 42, pp. 1601–1608, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Thompson and D. Guihen, “Review of mission planning for autonomous marine vehicle fleets,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 333–354, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Choset, “Coverage of known spaces: The boustrophedon cellular decomposition,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 247–253, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Ozkan, A. Yazici, M. Kapanoglu, and O. Parlaktuna, “A genetic algorithm for task completion time minimization for multi-robot sensor-based coverage,” Proc. of IEEE Control Applications, (CCA) & Intelligent Control (ISIC), IEEE, pp. 1164–1169, 2009.

  18. A. F. Ryerson and Q. Zhang, “Vehicle path planning for complete field coverage using genetic algorithms,” Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 2007.

  19. S. X. Yang and C. Luo, “A neural network approach to complete coverage path planning,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 718–724, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F.-L. Lian, “Cooperative path planning of dynamical multi-agent systems using differential flatness approach,” International Journal of Control, Automation, no. 3, 2008.

  21. A. Janchiv, D. Batsaikhan, B. Kim, W. G. Lee, and S.-G. Lee, “Time-efficient and complete coverage path planning based on flow networks for multi-robots,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 369–376, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Baldacci, A. Mingozzi, and R. Roberti, “Recent exact algorithms for solving the vehicle routing problem under capacity and time window constraints,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2012.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Whitbrook, Q. Meng, and P. W. Chung, “Reliable, distributed scheduling and rescheduling for time-critical, multiagent systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 732–747, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. B. Fogel, “A parallel processing approach to a multiple travelling salesman problem using evolutionary programming,” Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Parallel Processing, Fullerton, CA, pp. 318–326, 1990.

  25. T. Vidal, T. G. Crainic, M. Gendreau, N. Lahrichi, and W. Rei, “A hybrid genetic algorithm for multidepot and periodic vehicle routing problems,” Operations Research, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 611–624, 2012.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Király and J. Abonyi, “Redesign of the supply of mobile mechanics based on a novel genetic optimization algorithm using Google maps API,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, pp. 122–130, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Arbelaez, D. Mehta, B. O’Sullivan, and L. Quesada, “A constraint-based local search for edge disjoint rooted distance-constrained minimum spanning tree problem,” Proc. of International Conference on AI and OR Techniques in Constriant Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, Springer, pp. 31–46, 2015.

  28. S. Yoon and J. Kim, “Efficient multi-agent task allocation for collaborative route planning with multiple unmanned vehicles,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 3580–3585, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Z. Mi, Y. Yang, and G. Liu, “Coverage enhancement of mobile multi-agent networks while preserving global connectivity,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, pp. 5381–5386, 2011.

  30. T. Bektas, “The multiple traveling salesman problem: an overview of formulations and solution procedures,” Omega, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 209–219, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Yoon and J. Kim, “Fleet size optimization and collaborative route planning for multi-vehicle task allocation,” Proc. of AIAA Scitech Forum, p. 1572, 2019.

  32. H. W. Kuhn, “The hungarian method for the assignment problem,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 83–97, 1955.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Munkres, “Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems,” Journal of the society for industrial and applied mathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 1957.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. J. van Leeuwen and A. A. Schoone, Untangling a Traveling Salesman Tour in the Plane, Rijksuniversiteit, Vakgroep Informatica, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Diestel, Graph Theory, 4th ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Aranda, G. López-Nicolás, C. Sagüés, and Y. Mezouar, “Formation control of mobile robots using multiple aerial cameras,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1064–1071, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. L. Pitonakova, M. Giuliani, A. Pipe, and A. Winfield, “Feature and performance comparison of the v-rep, gazebo and argos robot simulators,” Proc. of Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, Springer, pp. 357–368, 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinwhan Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Associate Editor Son-Cheol Yu under the direction of Editor-in-Chief Keum-Shik Hong. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by Agency for Defense Development under the contract UD170025DD, and the project titled “Development of a core technology and infra technology for the operation of USV with high reliability” funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea.

Sukmin Yoon received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea, in 2012, and an M.S. degree in the division of ocean systems engineering from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea, in 2014, where he is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree with the Department of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include multi-agent task allocation, mission planning, and automation.

Haggi Do received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea, where he is currently working as an M.S. candidate. His research interests include multi-agent systems and autonomous navigation.

Jinwhan Kim received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in naval architecture and ocean engineering from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, and a Ph.D. degree in aeronautics and astronautics from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. He was a full-time Researcher with the Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials and subsequently with the Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute. In 2010, he joined the faculty of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea where he is an associate professor of mechanical engineering. His research interests include robotics and guidance, control, and estimation of dynamical systems. He is a Senior Member of AIAA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, S., Do, H. & Kim, J. Collaborative Mission and Route Planning of Multi-vehicle Systems for Autonomous Search in Marine Environment. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 18, 546–555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0666-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0666-4

Keywords

Navigation