Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Large-Scale Flow Measurements and Analysis for Radial Inlets of Industrial Centrifugal Compressors Based on Multi-hole Probe System

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-hole probe (MHP), as a classical measuring instrument, continues to play an important role in the pressure and velocity measurements for industrial applications by virtue of its robust and reliable performance as well as the simple structure and low cost. But the flow directionality limitations and the low efficiency of traditional operations become obstacles to the large-scale measurements of MHPs. In this paper, an improved operating method is adopted for conventional MHPs to extend their measuring range of incidence angles, and a corresponding auto-measuring system has been developed to realize automatic calibration and measurement of MHPs for industrial large-scale flow measurements. Measurement uncertainties of the system have been experimentally analyzed, verifying a good accuracy: errors of 0.36° in pitch angle, 0.40° in yaw angle and 0.83% in velocity magnitude (95% CI). Furthermore, this auto-measuring system has been applied in the large-scale measurements on different radial inlets for industrial centrifugal compressors, which provide valuable flow information that was not previously available for industrial productions and assist with the improvement study. Analysis and applications in this paper prove that the developed system not only reduces the flow directionality limitations of conventional MHPs, but also significantly improves the experimental efficiency and the control-precision of the probe, achieves a good repeatability and ensures the reliability of the experimental data, which satisfies the requirements of large-scale measurements in industrial applications. Meanwhile, the portability of the system makes it more convenient and flexible to be applied in various industrial productions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(C_{Pt}\) :

Total pressure coefficient, \(C_{Pt} = 2(p_{t} - p_{atm} )/\rho v_{0}^{2}\)

i, j :

Index number

\(Ma\) :

Mach number

m, n :

Total number for probe calibration/measurement

\(p\) :

Pressure (Pa)

\(T\) :

Temperature (K)

\(t\) :

Time (s)

\(v_{0}\) :

Inlet velocity (m s−1)

\(\left| {\vec{v}} \right|\) :

Velocity magnitude (m s−1)

\(z\) :

Axial position (m)

\(\alpha\) :

Pitch angle (°)

\(\beta\) :

Yaw angle (°)

\(\sigma\) :

Standard deviation

\(\bar{\Delta }\) :

Mean error

atm :

Atmospheric condition

i, j :

Index number

max:

Maximum

min:

Minimums

\(s\) :

Static condition

\(t\) :

Total condition

MHP:

Multi-hole probe

References

  1. Modarress, D., Elghobashi, S., & Tan, H. (1984). Two-component LDA measurement in a two-phase turbulent jet. AIAA Journal, 22, 624–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stauter, R. C., Dring, R. P., & Carta, F. O (1990). Temporally and spatially resolved flow in a two-stage axial compressor: Part 1—experiment. In ASME 1990 international gas turbine and aeroengine congress and exposition (p. V001T01A88-VT01A88). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

  3. Michon, G.-J., Miton, H., & Ouayhaya, N. (2005). Unsteady off-design velocity and Reynolds stresses in an axial compressor. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 21, 961–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, K. I., Lee, J. C., & Yang, S. H. (2018). Optimal on-machine measurement of position-independent geometric errors for rotary axes in five-axis machines with a universal head. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 19(4), 545–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wernet, M. P., Bright, M. M., & Skoch, G. J. (2001). An investigation of surge in a high-speed centrifugal compressor using digital PIV. Journal of Turbomachinery, 123, 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, X.-J., & Liu, B.-J. (2007). Stereoscopic PIV measurement of unsteady flows in an axial compressor stage. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 31, 1049–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, X. F., Cai, A. J., & Zhao, Y. L. (2018). Experimental investigation of measurement error in networked resistors arrays based on zero potential method. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 19(4), 473–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks, J. M., Gupta, A. K., Smith, M. S., & Marineau, E. C. (2016). PIV measurements of Mach 2.7 turbulent boundary layer with varying Reynolds numbers. In Proceedings of 54th aerospace sciences meeting, SciTech, AIAA-2016-1147, San Diego, California (p. 6).

  9. Telionis, D., Yang, Y., & Redinioti, O. (2009). Recent developments in multi-hole probe (MHP) technology. In 20th international congress of mechanical engineering.

  10. Nani, V. M. (2018). A new algorithm for predictive metrological verification of measuring apparatus. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 19(2), 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gündog̈du, M., & Çarpinliog̈lu, M. (1998). A multi-tube pressure probe calibration method for measurements of mean flow parameters in swirling flows. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 9, 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilarranz, J. L., Ranz, A. J., Kopko, J. A., & Sorokes, J. M. (2005). On the use of five-hole probes in the testing of industrial centrifugal compressors. Journal of Turbomachinery, 127, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frohnapfel, D. J., O’Brien, W. F., & Lowe, K. T. (2015). Fan response to inlet swirl distortions produced by boundary layer ingesting aircraft configurations. In 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference (p. 3804).

  14. Ligrani, P., Singer, B., & Baun, L. (1989). Spatial resolution and downwash velocity corrections for multiple-hole pressure probes in complex flows. Experiments in Fluids, 7, 424–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ligrani, P., Singer, B., & Baun, L. (1989). Miniature five-hole pressure probe for measurement of three mean velocity components in low-speed flows. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 22, 868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dominy, R., & Hodson, H. (1993). An investigation of factors influencing the calibration of five-hole probes for three-dimensional flow measurements. Journal of Turbomachinery, 115, 513–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rediniotis, O., Hoang, N., & Telionis, D. (1993). Seven-hole probe: It’s calibration and use. In ASME fluids engineering division publication FED (pp. 21–26). New York: ASME.

  18. Lien, S., & Ahmed, N. (2011). An examination of suitability of multi-hole pressure probe technique for skin friction measurement in turbulent flow. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 22, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reichert, B. A., & Wendt, B. J. (1994). A new algorithm for five-hole probe calibration, data reduction, and uncertainty analysis. Washington: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morrison, G., Schobeiri, M., & Pappu, K. (1998). Five-hole pressure probe analysis technique. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 9, 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sumner, D. (2002). A comparison of data-reduction methods for a seven-hole probe. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124, 523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ostowari, C., & Wentz, W., Jr. (1983). Modified calibration technique of a five-hole probe for high flow angles. Experiments in Fluids, 1, 166–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pisasale, A., & Ahmed, N. (2002). A novel method for extending the calibration range of five-hole probe for highly three-dimensional flows. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 13, 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marigorta, E. B. (2008). Direct calibration framework of triple-hole pressure probes for incompressible flow. Measurement Science and Technology, 19, 075401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naughton, J., Cattafesta I, L. N., & Settles, G. (1993). Miniature, fast-response five-hole conical probe for supersonic flowfield measurements. AIAA Journal, 31, 453–458.

  26. Duquesne, P., Ciocan, G. D., Aeschlimann, V., Bombenger, A., & Deschênes, C. (2013). Pressure probe with five embedded flush-mounted sensors: Unsteady pressure and velocity measurements in hydraulic turbine model. Experiments in Fluids, 54, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, H., Zeng, W., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Development of an omnidirectional five-hole pressure probe. AIAA Journal, 54(7), 2190–2193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rediniotis, O. K., & Kinser, R. E. (1998). Development of a nearly omnidirectional velocity measurement pressure probe. AIAA Journal, 36, 1854–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, H., Chen, X., & Zhao, W. (2012). Development of a 17-hole omnidirectional pressure probe. AIAA Journal, 50, 1426–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramakrishnan, V., & Rediniotis, O. K. (2005). Calibration and data-reduction algorithms for nonconventional multihole pressure probes. AIAA Journal, 43, 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramakrishnan, V., & Rediniotis, O. K. (2007). Development of a 12-hole omnidirectional flow-velocity measurement probe. AIAA Journal, 45, 1430–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Díaz, K. A., Oro, J. F., & Marigorta, E. B. (2009). Cylindrical three-hole pressure probe calibration for large angular range. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 20, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Treaster, A. L., & Yocum, A. M. (1978). The calibration and application of five-hole probes. DTIC document.

  34. Yuan, M., Mao, Y., Qi, D., & Tan, J. (2011). Automatic measuring system of pressure and velocity for the aerodynamic probes, China.

  35. Zilliac, G. (1993). Modelling, calibration, and error analysis of seven-hole pressure probes. Experiments in Fluids, 14, 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Flathers, M. B., Bache, G. E., & Rainsberger, R. (1996). An experimental and computational investigation of flow in a radial inlet of an industrial pipeline centrifugal compressor. Journal of Turbomachinery, 118, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pazzi, S., & Michelassi, V. (2000). Analysis and design outlines of centrifugal compressor inlet volutes. In ASME turbo expo. Munich: ASME.

  38. Kim, Y., & Koch, J. (2004). Design and numerical investigation of advanced radial inlet for a centrifugal compressor stage. In 2004 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition (pp. 127–130). Anaheim: ASME.

  39. Xu, Z. (1990). Principles of centrifugal compressor. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lüdtke, K. H. (2004). Process centrifugal compressors: basics, function, operation, design, application. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Han, F., Mao, Y., Tan, J., Zhao, C., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Flow measurement and simulation of a radial inlet for centrifugal compressor. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy., 229, 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51779026 and 51476123) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 3132018248 and 3132018251). The authors also acknowledge SBW (Shenyang Blower Works Group Co., Ltd) for their support of the study and the industrial productions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, 116026, China

    Fenghui Han & Zhe Wang

  2. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China

    Fenghui Han, Yijun Mao & Yiyun Zhang

  3. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    Zhe Wang

  4. Department of Research and Development, Shenyang Blower Works Group Co., Ltd, Shenyang, 110005, China

    Jiajian Tan

Authors
  1. Fenghui Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhe Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yijun Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yiyun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiajian Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhe Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, F., Wang, Z., Mao, Y. et al. Large-Scale Flow Measurements and Analysis for Radial Inlets of Industrial Centrifugal Compressors Based on Multi-hole Probe System. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 20, 79–92 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00036-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00036-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation