Skip to main content
Log in

A New Algorithm for Predictive Metrological Verification of Measuring Apparatus

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a general algorithm for predictive metrological verification. The new algorithm is to be applied for dimensional control done with a measuring apparatus, regardless its area of use. Practically, the proposed method consists in a statistical analysis and a new interpretation for values what characterize the metrologca parameters: the accuracy error (scattering) and the precision error (fidelity). The theoretical studies and experimental researches were focused to identity the actual causes for the downgrading of the measuring apparatus due to normal wear. It was used a combination between statistical control parameters (the arithmetic mean and root-mean-square deviation (standard deviation)), and metrological characteristics (the accuracy error and precision error). The new algorithm for the predictive metrological verification allows the parameters dynamics observation. The user can forecast the evolution of the measuring apparatus qualitative characteristics. Thus, it can be discovered if the apparatus is damaged or simply it was taken out from its accuracy class due of normal wear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baron, T., “Statistical Methods for Analysis and Quality Control of Production,” Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buzduga M., Marcuta C., and Sarbu G. C., “Metrology: Theory and Practice,” Technical–Info Publishing House, Chisinau, 2001. ISBN 9975-63-038-3 (in Romania)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iliescu, C., Pantelimon, V., Cepisca, C., and Vlaicu, C., “Metrology. Measurement System,” ICPE Publishing, Bucharest, 1994. (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, J., “Introduction to Error Analysis, the Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements,” University Science Books, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tiron, M., “Theory of Measurement Errors and the Least Squares Method,” Technical Publishing House, Bucharest, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  6. IEEE Std. 1241-2010, “IEEE Standard for Terminology and Test Methods for Analog-To-Digital Converters,” 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bacivarov I. C., Bacivarov, A., and Mihalache A., “Statistical Control of Conformity and Products Reliability,” “Electronica 2000” Publishing House, Bucharest, 2003. ISBN 973-99878-6-9 (in Romania)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chisci, L., Rossiter, J. A., and Zappa, G., “Systems with Persistent Disturbances: Predictive Control with Restricted Constraints,” Automatica, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 1019–1028, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Maciejowski, J. M., “Predictive Control: With Constraints,” Pearson Education, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maeder, U., Borrelli, F., and Morari, M., “Linear Offset-Free Model Predictive Control,” Automatica, Vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 2214–2222, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Riaz, M. and Muhammad, F., “An Application of Control Charts in Manufacturing Industry,” Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 77–92, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richards, A., “Fast Model Predictive Control with Soft Constraints,” European Journal of Control, Vol. 25, pp. 51–59, 2015.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. NML CEE 73/362, “Measurements of Length,” 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Official Journal of the European Union, “Regulation (EC) No 764/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council,” 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Montgomery, D. C., “Introduction to Statistical Quality Control,” Wiley, 6th Ed., 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nani, V., “Statistical Control of Processing Prismatic Pieces on Grinding Machines,” Measurement, Vol. 47, pp. 516–520, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Panaite, V. and Munteanu, R., “Statistical Control and Reliability,” Didactic and Pedagogical Publishing, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan, T. P., “Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement,” Wiley, 2nd Ed., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Balestrieri, E., Catelani, M., Ciani, L., Rapuano, S., and Zanobini, A., “Word Error Rate Measurement Uncertainty Estimation in Digitizing Waveform Recorders,” Measurement, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 572–581, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao, C. V., Wright, S. J., and Rawlings, J. B., “Application of Interior-Point Methods to Model Predictive Control,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 723–757, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Scokaert, P. O. and Mayne, D., “Min-Max Feedback Model Predictive Control for Constrained Linear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic control, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1136–1142, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Vizireanu, D. N. and Preda, R. O., “Is “Five-Point” Estimation better than “Three-Point” Estimation?” Measurement, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 840–842, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wills, A. G. and Heath, W. P., “An Exterior/Interior-Point Approach to Infeasibility in Model Predictive Control,” Proc. of 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3701–3705, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bemporad, A., Borrelli, F., and Morari, M., “Model Predictive Control Based on Linear Programming~ The Explicit Solution,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1974–1985, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ling, K.-V., Wu, B. F., and Maciejowski, J., “Embedded Model Predictive Control (MPC) Using a FPGA,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 15250–15255, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Y. and Boyd, S., “Fast Model Predictive Control Using Online Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 267–278, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wills, A. G. and Heath, W. P., “Barrier Function Based Model Predictive Control,” Automatica, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 1415–1422, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viorel-Mihai Nani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nani, VM. A New Algorithm for Predictive Metrological Verification of Measuring Apparatus. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 19, 167–172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0019-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0019-x

Keywords

Navigation