Skip to main content
Log in

Students’ social media engagement and fear of missing out (FoMO) in a diverse classroom

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing attention paid to fear of missing out (FoMO) psychological phenomenon in explaining social media engagement (SME), this mixed-method research measured the relative impact of FoMO on students’ SME for personal reasons during lectures. The moderating effect of culture (minority vs. non-minority students) on the connection between FoMO and SME was also considered. Quantitative data were gathered from 279-undergraduate students. The structural equation modeling results showed a positive moderate connection between the FoMO and SME variables. The bootstrapping result showed a significant indirect effect between the minority group of students and SME through increased levels of FoMO. A sequential explanatory strategy was used to refine and interpret the quantitative results. Accordingly, qualitative data were gathered by using semi-structured interviews to assist in explaining the findings of the quantitative phase. The qualitative data suggested several explanations for students’ distractive behavior enabled by technology during class. The main recurrent theme was the frequently used instructional activities based on the teacher-centered pedagogical approach. This approach imposed greater challenges for minority students as they tend to grapple with a host of language barriers. These students reported using social media tools to seek help from friends during lectures and feared missing out a useful assistance. Another finding showed that mainly non-minority students who experienced FoMO admitted using social media during lessons regardless of the teaching method implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Proceedings from privacy enhancing technologies workshop, 28–30 June 2006 (pp. 1–22). Retrieved from http://people.cs.pitt.edu/~chang/265/proj10/zim/imaginedcom.pdf.

  • Alt, D. (2014). The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring features of constructivist learning environments in higher education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3). doi:10.14786/flr.v2i2.68.

  • Alt, D. (2015). College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, D. (2016). Students’ wellbeing, fear of missing out, and social media engagement for leisure in higher education learning environments. Current Psychology. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9496-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, D., & Geiger, B. (2012). Goal orientations and tendency to neutralize academic cheating: An ecological perspective. Psychological Studies, 57(4), 404–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H. (2011). Never heard of fomo? You’re so missing out. The observer. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/17/hephzibah-anderson-fomo-new-acronym.

  • Arnold, N., & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Ziegler, G. (2015). Literacy education for low-educated second language learning adults in multilingual contexts: The case of luxembourg. Multilingual Education, 5(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L. Q., & Wu, S. (2014). Home language and literacy practices among immigrant second-language learners. Language Teaching, 47(4), 414–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galagan, P. (2010). Burp, chatter, tweet: New sounds in the classroom. T + D, 64(7), 26–29.

  • Garrett, T. (2014). Effective classroom management: The essentials. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmill, E., & Peterson, M. (2006). Technology use among college students: Implications for student affairs professionals. NASPA Journal, 43(2), 280–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hai, A. (2012). Higher education for Arab citizens of Israel realities, challenges and new opportunities. Inter‐Agency Task Force on Israeli Arab Issues.

  • Heafner, T. L., & Friedman, A. M. (2008). Wikis and constructivism in secondary social studies: Fostering a deeper understanding. Computers in the Schools, 25, 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (2011). Your students love social media… and so can you. Teaching Tolerance, 39, 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of MySpace! Computers & Education, 54, 776–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juncoa, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59(2), 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, S. (2013). Is FoMO depriving us of our ability to exist in the present and take pleasure in the here and now? The independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/is-fomo-depriving-us-of-our-ability-to-exist-in-the-present-and-take-pleasure-in-the-here-and-now-8449677.html.

  • Kiraly, D. (2014). A social constructivist approach to translator education: Empowerment from theory to practice. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, B. L. (2009) ‘On teaching and learning: Putting the principles and practices of dialogue education into action’ in Review of Higher Education, 33(1), Fall, 129–130.

  • Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., Wang, S. M., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60, 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindorth, T., & Bergquist, M. (2010). Laptopers in an educational practice: promoting the personal learning situation. Computers & Education, 54, 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, R. (2011). The new digital shoreline: How Web 2.0 and Millennials are revolutionalizing higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

  • McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. In Proceedings of the 22nd ASCILITE conference, 4–7 December 2005 (pp. 421–431). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/49_McMahon%20&%20Pospisil.pdf.

  • Ophira, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18 February 2009 (pp. 15583–15587). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106.

  • Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (2008). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed., pp. 351–374). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1841–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, T. V., & Savage, M. K. (2010). Successful classroom management and discipline: Teaching self-control and responsibility (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltman, H. J. (2015). Experimental design and analysis. Retrieved from http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf.

  • Top, E. (2012). Blogging as a social medium in undergraduate courses: Sense of community best predictor of perceived learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandel, T. L. (2008). Colleges and universities want to be your friend: Communicating via online social networking. Planning for Higher Education, 37(1), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C., Curran, M., & Tomlinson-Clarke, S. (2003). Culturally responsive classroom management: Awareness into action. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58, 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurst, C., Smarkola, C., & Gaffney, M. A. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers & Education, 51, 1766–1783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorit Alt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alt, D. Students’ social media engagement and fear of missing out (FoMO) in a diverse classroom. J Comput High Educ 29, 388–410 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9149-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9149-x

Keywords

Navigation