Students’ social media engagement and fear of missing out (FoMO) in a diverse classroom
- 3k Downloads
With the growing attention paid to fear of missing out (FoMO) psychological phenomenon in explaining social media engagement (SME), this mixed-method research measured the relative impact of FoMO on students’ SME for personal reasons during lectures. The moderating effect of culture (minority vs. non-minority students) on the connection between FoMO and SME was also considered. Quantitative data were gathered from 279-undergraduate students. The structural equation modeling results showed a positive moderate connection between the FoMO and SME variables. The bootstrapping result showed a significant indirect effect between the minority group of students and SME through increased levels of FoMO. A sequential explanatory strategy was used to refine and interpret the quantitative results. Accordingly, qualitative data were gathered by using semi-structured interviews to assist in explaining the findings of the quantitative phase. The qualitative data suggested several explanations for students’ distractive behavior enabled by technology during class. The main recurrent theme was the frequently used instructional activities based on the teacher-centered pedagogical approach. This approach imposed greater challenges for minority students as they tend to grapple with a host of language barriers. These students reported using social media tools to seek help from friends during lectures and feared missing out a useful assistance. Another finding showed that mainly non-minority students who experienced FoMO admitted using social media during lessons regardless of the teaching method implemented.
KeywordsSocial media engagement Fear of missing out Mixed-method study Diverse classroom
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Proceedings from privacy enhancing technologies workshop, 28–30 June 2006 (pp. 1–22). Retrieved from http://people.cs.pitt.edu/~chang/265/proj10/zim/imaginedcom.pdf.
- Alt, D. (2014). The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring features of constructivist learning environments in higher education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3). doi: 10.14786/flr.v2i2.68.
- Anderson, H. (2011). Never heard of fomo? You’re so missing out. The observer. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/17/hephzibah-anderson-fomo-new-acronym.
- Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Galagan, P. (2010). Burp, chatter, tweet: New sounds in the classroom. T + D, 64(7), 26–29.Google Scholar
- Garrett, T. (2014). Effective classroom management: The essentials. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Hai, A. (2012). Higher education for Arab citizens of Israel realities, challenges and new opportunities. Inter‐Agency Task Force on Israeli Arab Issues.Google Scholar
- Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Jackson, C. (2011). Your students love social media… and so can you. Teaching Tolerance, 39, 38–41.Google Scholar
- Kellner, S. (2013). Is FoMO depriving us of our ability to exist in the present and take pleasure in the here and now? The independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/is-fomo-depriving-us-of-our-ability-to-exist-in-the-present-and-take-pleasure-in-the-here-and-now-8449677.html.
- Kiraly, D. (2014). A social constructivist approach to translator education: Empowerment from theory to practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 241–251.Google Scholar
- Licklider, B. L. (2009) ‘On teaching and learning: Putting the principles and practices of dialogue education into action’ in Review of Higher Education, 33(1), Fall, 129–130.Google Scholar
- McHenry, R. (2011). The new digital shoreline: How Web 2.0 and Millennials are revolutionalizing higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
- McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. In Proceedings of the 22nd ASCILITE conference, 4–7 December 2005 (pp. 421–431). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/49_McMahon%20&%20Pospisil.pdf.
- Ophira, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18 February 2009 (pp. 15583–15587). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106.
- Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Peräkylä, A. (2008). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed., pp. 351–374). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Savage, T. V., & Savage, M. K. (2010). Successful classroom management and discipline: Teaching self-control and responsibility (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Seltman, H. J. (2015). Experimental design and analysis. Retrieved from http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf.
- Wandel, T. L. (2008). Colleges and universities want to be your friend: Communicating via online social networking. Planning for Higher Education, 37(1), 35–48.Google Scholar