Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 388–410 | Cite as

Students’ social media engagement and fear of missing out (FoMO) in a diverse classroom

  • Dorit Alt
Article
First Online:

Abstract

With the growing attention paid to fear of missing out (FoMO) psychological phenomenon in explaining social media engagement (SME), this mixed-method research measured the relative impact of FoMO on students’ SME for personal reasons during lectures. The moderating effect of culture (minority vs. non-minority students) on the connection between FoMO and SME was also considered. Quantitative data were gathered from 279-undergraduate students. The structural equation modeling results showed a positive moderate connection between the FoMO and SME variables. The bootstrapping result showed a significant indirect effect between the minority group of students and SME through increased levels of FoMO. A sequential explanatory strategy was used to refine and interpret the quantitative results. Accordingly, qualitative data were gathered by using semi-structured interviews to assist in explaining the findings of the quantitative phase. The qualitative data suggested several explanations for students’ distractive behavior enabled by technology during class. The main recurrent theme was the frequently used instructional activities based on the teacher-centered pedagogical approach. This approach imposed greater challenges for minority students as they tend to grapple with a host of language barriers. These students reported using social media tools to seek help from friends during lectures and feared missing out a useful assistance. Another finding showed that mainly non-minority students who experienced FoMO admitted using social media during lessons regardless of the teaching method implemented.

Keywords

Social media engagement Fear of missing out Mixed-method study Diverse classroom 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Proceedings from privacy enhancing technologies workshop, 28–30 June 2006 (pp. 1–22). Retrieved from http://people.cs.pitt.edu/~chang/265/proj10/zim/imaginedcom.pdf.
  2. Alt, D. (2014). The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring features of constructivist learning environments in higher education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3). doi: 10.14786/flr.v2i2.68.
  3. Alt, D. (2015). College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alt, D. (2016). Students’ wellbeing, fear of missing out, and social media engagement for leisure in higher education learning environments. Current Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9496-1.Google Scholar
  5. Alt, D., & Geiger, B. (2012). Goal orientations and tendency to neutralize academic cheating: An ecological perspective. Psychological Studies, 57(4), 404–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, H. (2011). Never heard of fomo? You’re so missing out. The observer. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/17/hephzibah-anderson-fomo-new-acronym.
  7. Arnold, N., & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Choi, J., & Ziegler, G. (2015). Literacy education for low-educated second language learning adults in multilingual contexts: The case of luxembourg. Multilingual Education, 5(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Dixon, L. Q., & Wu, S. (2014). Home language and literacy practices among immigrant second-language learners. Language Teaching, 47(4), 414–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galagan, P. (2010). Burp, chatter, tweet: New sounds in the classroom. T + D, 64(7), 26–29.Google Scholar
  15. Garrett, T. (2014). Effective classroom management: The essentials. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gemmill, E., & Peterson, M. (2006). Technology use among college students: Implications for student affairs professionals. NASPA Journal, 43(2), 280–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hai, A. (2012). Higher education for Arab citizens of Israel realities, challenges and new opportunities. Inter‐Agency Task Force on Israeli Arab Issues.Google Scholar
  18. Heafner, T. L., & Friedman, A. M. (2008). Wikis and constructivism in secondary social studies: Fostering a deeper understanding. Computers in the Schools, 25, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, C. (2011). Your students love social media… and so can you. Teaching Tolerance, 39, 38–41.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of MySpace! Computers & Education, 54, 776–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Juncoa, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59(2), 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kellner, S. (2013). Is FoMO depriving us of our ability to exist in the present and take pleasure in the here and now? The independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/is-fomo-depriving-us-of-our-ability-to-exist-in-the-present-and-take-pleasure-in-the-here-and-now-8449677.html.
  24. Kiraly, D. (2014). A social constructivist approach to translator education: Empowerment from theory to practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 241–251.Google Scholar
  26. Licklider, B. L. (2009) ‘On teaching and learning: Putting the principles and practices of dialogue education into action’ in Review of Higher Education, 33(1), Fall, 129–130.Google Scholar
  27. Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., Wang, S. M., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60, 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindorth, T., & Bergquist, M. (2010). Laptopers in an educational practice: promoting the personal learning situation. Computers & Education, 54, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McHenry, R. (2011). The new digital shoreline: How Web 2.0 and Millennials are revolutionalizing higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. In Proceedings of the 22nd ASCILITE conference, 4–7 December 2005 (pp. 421–431). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/49_McMahon%20&%20Pospisil.pdf.
  31. Ophira, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18 February 2009 (pp. 15583–15587). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106.
  32. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Peräkylä, A. (2008). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed., pp. 351–374). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1841–1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savage, T. V., & Savage, M. K. (2010). Successful classroom management and discipline: Teaching self-control and responsibility (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Seltman, H. J. (2015). Experimental design and analysis. Retrieved from http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf.
  38. Top, E. (2012). Blogging as a social medium in undergraduate courses: Sense of community best predictor of perceived learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wandel, T. L. (2008). Colleges and universities want to be your friend: Communicating via online social networking. Planning for Higher Education, 37(1), 35–48.Google Scholar
  40. Weinstein, C., Curran, M., & Tomlinson-Clarke, S. (2003). Culturally responsive classroom management: Awareness into action. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wurst, C., Smarkola, C., & Gaffney, M. A. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers & Education, 51, 1766–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kinneret College on the Sea of GalileeJordan ValleyIsrael

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options