Advertisement

Topical Low Dose Preservative-Free Hydrocortisone Reduces Signs and Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Dry Eye: A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Martin Kallab
  • Stephan Szegedi
  • Nikolaus Hommer
  • Hannes Stegmann
  • Semira Kaya
  • René M. Werkmeister
  • Doreen Schmidl
  • Leopold Schmetterer
  • Gerhard GarhöferEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Purpose

Dry eye disease (DED) is a highly prevalent ocular condition with a significant burden on affected patients. Regardless of the underlying etiology, DED is associated with increased ocular surface inflammation. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a short-term treatment with topical low dose hydrocortisone in patients with chronic DED and ocular surface inflammation.

Methods

A total of 60 patients (mean age 51 ± 14 years) with chronic DED and conjunctival hyperemia greater than grade 2 on the Efron scale were included. Patients were randomized to receive either preservative-free hydrocortisone 0.335% (Softacort, Laboratories Thea, France) for 12 days four times daily followed by 2 days twice daily instillation (intense treatment group) or 8 days three times daily followed by 3 days twice daily treatment (standard treatment group). Ocular redness was assessed at baseline, day 14, and day 28. Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) and clinical tests to assess signs and symptoms of DED were performed.

Results

Conjunctival hyperemia and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) significantly decreased in both treatment groups (p < 0.001 each) after hydrocortisone treatment. A significant increase in tear film thickness was seen 4 weeks after treatment start (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). IOP did not change in either of the two treatment groups (p = 0.45).

Conclusion

Treatment with low dose hydrocortisone 0.335% reduced ocular inflammation and decreased OSDI score. No change in IOP was observed in either of the two treatment schedules. Because of its good safety profile, low dose hydrocortisone may be an interesting alternative to standard corticosteroid treatment in DED.

Funding

Laboratories Thea.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov registry: NCT03907865.

Keywords

Corticosteroid Dry eye disease Hydrocortisone Inflammation Ophthalmology Preservative free Tear film 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding

The present study was sponsored by Laboratories Thea, France. The Rapid Service Fees were funded by Laboratories Thea. All authors had full access to all of the data in this study and take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Doreen Schmidl is a consultant for Laboratories Thea. Leopold Schmetterer is a consultant for Laboratories Thea. Gerhard Garhöfer is a consultant for Laboratories Thea. Martin Kallab, Stephan Szegedi, Nikolaus Hommer, Hannes Stegmann, Semira Kaya, and René M. Werkmeister declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna. The study was performed in adherence to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki including all revisions as well as Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to participation and Springer’s policy concerning informed consent has been followed.

References

  1. 1.
    Lemp MA. Report of the national eye institute/industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21:221–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lemp MA. Advances in understanding and managing dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:438–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:276–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yavuz B, Bozdag Pehlivan S, Unlu N. An overview on dry eye treatment: approaches for cyclosporin a delivery. Sci World J. 2012;2012:194848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:575–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bielory BP, O’Brien TP, Bielory L. Management of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: guide to therapy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998;18:182–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:615–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DEWS. Methodologies to diagnose and monitor dry eye disease: report of the Diagnostic Methodology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5:108–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22:640–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Werkmeister RM, Alex A, Kaya S, et al. Measurement of tear film thickness using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:5578–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nolfi J, Caffery B. Randomized comparison of in vivo performance of two point-of-care tear film osmometers. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:945–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khanal S, Millar TJ. Barriers to clinical uptake of tear osmolarity measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:341–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goppelt-Struebe M. Molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis by glucocorticoids. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997;53:1389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wozniak PA, Schmidl D, Bata AM, et al. Effect of different lubricant eye gels on tear film thickness as measured with ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e307–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmidl D, Schmetterer L, Witkowska KJ, et al. Tear film thickness after treatment with artificial tears in patients with moderate dry eye disease. Cornea. 2015;34:421–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidl D, Werkmeister R, Kaya S, et al. A controlled, randomized double-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chitosan-N-acetylcysteine for the treatment of dry eye syndrome. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017;33:375–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaya S, Schmidl D, Schmetterer L, et al. Effect of hyaluronic acid on tear film thickness as assessed with ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidl D, Witkowska KJ, Kaya S, et al. The association between subjective and objective parameters for the assessment of dry-eye syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:1467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hong S, Kim T, Chung SH, Kim EK, Seo KY. Recurrence after topical nonpreserved methylprednisolone therapy for keratoconjunctivitis sicca in Sjogren’s syndrome. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2007;23:78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nichols JJ, Nichols KK, Puent B, Saracino M, Mitchell GL. Evaluation of tear film interference patterns and measures of tear break-up time. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:363–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Messmer EM, et al. Correlations between commonly used objective signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of dry eye disease: clinical implications. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pflugfelder SC, Stern M, Zhang S, Shojaei A. LFA-1/ICAM-1 Interaction as a therapeutic target in dry eye disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017;33:5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aragona P, Spinella R, Rania L, et al. Safety and efficacy of 01% clobetasone butyrate eyedrops in the treatment of dry eye in Sjogren syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23:368–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leonardi A, Van Setten G, Amrane M, et al. Efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of severe dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized trial. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26:287–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Paiva CS, Corrales RM, Villarreal AL, et al. Corticosteroid and doxycycline suppress MMP-9 and inflammatory cytokine expression, MAPK activation in the corneal epithelium in experimental dry eye. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:526–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lekhanont K, Leyngold IM, Suwan-Apichon O, Rangsin R, Chuck RS. Comparison of topical dry eye medications for the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in a botulinum toxin B-induced mouse model. Cornea. 2007;26:84–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marsh P, Pflugfelder SC. Topical nonpreserved methylprednisolone therapy for keratoconjunctivitis sicca in Sjogren syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:811–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sainz MD, Simon Castellvi C, Kabbani O. Nonpreserved topical steroids and lacrimal punctal occlusion for severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2000;75:751–6.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pflugfelder SC, Maskin SL, Anderson B, et al. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter comparison of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, and placebo for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in patients with delayed tear clearance. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:444–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee HK, Ryu IH, Seo KY, Hong S, Kim HC, Kim EK. Topical 0.1% prednisolone lowers nerve growth factor expression in keratoconjunctivitis sicca patients. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kheirkhah A, Dohlman TH, Amparo F, et al. Effects of corneal nerve density on the response to treatment in dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:662–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pinto-Fraga J, Lopez-Miguel A, Gonzalez-Garcia MJ, et al. Topical fluorometholone protects the ocular surface of dry eye patients from desiccating stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:141–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheppard JD, Comstock TL, Cavet ME. Impact of the topical ophthalmic corticosteroid loteprednol etabonate on intraocular pressure. Adv Ther. 2016;33:532–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Teson M, Lopez-Miguel A, Neves H, Calonge M, Gonzalez-Garcia MJ, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Influence of climate on clinical diagnostic dry eye tests: pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:e284–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Kallab
    • 1
  • Stephan Szegedi
    • 1
  • Nikolaus Hommer
    • 1
  • Hannes Stegmann
    • 2
  • Semira Kaya
    • 3
  • René M. Werkmeister
    • 2
  • Doreen Schmidl
    • 1
  • Leopold Schmetterer
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Gerhard Garhöfer
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PharmacologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department of OphthalmologyHietzing HospitalViennaAustria
  4. 4.Singapore Eye Research InstituteSingaporeSingapore
  5. 5.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  6. 6.Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical ProgramDuke-NUS Medical SchoolSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations