Advertisement

Effects of Test Conditions on Fuel Economy of Gasoline-Powered Vehicle

  • Seokjoo Kwon
  • Minkyung Kang
  • Youngho Seo
  • Sungwook Park
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the influence on fuel economy testing of gasoline-powered vehicles is evaluated for various test conditions (e.g., laboratory temperature, soaking time, cooling fan, battery charge state, and driving mode tracking). It showed a difference in fuel economy results of approximately 3 % between low (88 %) and high (99 %) battery state of charge conditions because the alternator saving function has a positive effect on fuel economy. Fuel economy testing with laboratory temperature changes gave a slight reduction at 21 °C and slight increase at 29 °C. The cooling fan changes had an almost negligible effect on fuel consumption. The largest fuel economy result varied by 5.2 % in the soft, standard, and rough driving conditions.

Key Words

Fuel economy Battery SOC Cooling fan Soaking time Laboratory temperature 

Nomenclature

ASCR

absolute speed change rating, %

DR

distance rating, %

EER

energy economy rating, %

EPA

environmental protection agency in US

ER

energy rating, %

FTP

EPA federal test procedure

HWFET

EPA highway fuel economy test cycle

OBD II

on-board diagnostic system

SAE

society of automotive engineers

SOC

state of charge, %

UDDS

urban dynamometer driving schedule

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blanks, M. and Forster, N. (2016). Technical approach to increasing fuel economy test precision with light duty vehicles on a chassis dynamometer. SAE Paper No. 2016-01-0907.Google Scholar
  2. Jehlik, F., Wood, E., Gonder, J. and Lopp, S. (2015). Simulated real-world energy impacts of a thermally sensitive powertrain considering viscous losses and enrichment. SAE Paper No. 2015-01-0342.Google Scholar
  3. Kessels, J., Koot, M., Jager, B., Bosch, P., Aneke, N. and Kok, D. (2007). Energy management for the electric powernet in vehicles with a conventional drivetrain. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 15, 3, 494–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim, S., Kim, K., Ha, J., Kwon, S. and Seo, Y. (2016). A study about impact of battery SOC on fuel economy of conventional diesel vehicle. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 24, 4, 480–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kwon, S., Um, J., Kang, E. and Seo, Y. (2015). Analysis the effects of fuel economy due to the test condition changes in gasoline vehicles. KSAE Annual Conf. Proc., Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 203–206.Google Scholar
  6. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2016). Notification according to test methods of energy consumption efficiency, greenhouse gas emission and fuel consumption rate of vehicle. No. 2016-209.Google Scholar
  7. SAE International Standards (2011) Drive Quality Evaluation for Chassis Dynamometer Testing. SAE J 2951, J2951_201111.Google Scholar
  8. Wood, E., Gonder, J. and Jehlif, F. (2017). On-road validation of a simplified model for estimating realworld fuel economy. SAE Paper No. 2017-01-0892.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seokjoo Kwon
    • 1
  • Minkyung Kang
    • 2
  • Youngho Seo
    • 2
  • Sungwook Park
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Convergence EngineeringGraduate School of Hanyang UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Green Car Power System R&D DivisionKorea Automotive Technology InstituteChungnamKorea
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations