Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric properties of the adolescents’ interpretation and belief questionnaire (AIBQ) for measuring interpretation Bias in Chinese adolescents

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cognitive model of social anxiety disorder hypothesized that socially anxious individuals tend to negatively interpret ambiguous scenarios, which was termed an Interpretation bias (IB). The Adolescents’ Interpretation Bias Questionnaire (AIBQ) is a widely used self-report instrument to measure IB towards social situations for adolescents. The main objective of the current study was to culturally revise AIBQ in Chinese adolescents. In total, 960 adolescents participated, and four weeks later, 185 of them were re-measured with Chinese version of AIBQ (C-AIBQ). We tested construct validity, examined internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and assessed convergent and divergent validity of the C-AIBQ subscales. Overall, C-AIBQ variables showed satisfactory construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and convergent and discriminant validity, in particular the social negative interpretation subscale. Our results indicate that this instrument is adequate to measure interpretation bias in Chinese adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

When contacting first or corresponding author, they will be accessible to the data and material.

Notes

  1. Although the fact that answer response to belief question is, technically, categorical, the items still could be summed and averaged for social and non-social belief subscales (Miers et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2019).

  2. Omega coefficient (ω) is one of the indicators to assess the consistency (Revelle & Zinbarg, 2009).

  3. Single measure ICC was adopted in the present study, which means the stability of scores from one rater measured at two different occasions.

  4. Kappa coefficients analyses were performed using MedCalc for Windows, version 19.0.3 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).

  5. Notwithstanding the value of RMSEA is greater than .08, the cut-off which is suggested by SEM investigators, the values of CFI, TLI and SRMR are good; hence, overall, the model is still acceptable (Barrett, 2007).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are so appreciative of Dr. Chenying Zhao for providing information and suggestion for data processing.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council under Grant [2017]3109.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Meng Yu designed the research, deal with data, and wrote the manuscript. P. Michiel Westenberg structured and critically revised the manuscript. Ye Wang helped collect data. Jianping Wang designed and consulted the research. Anne C. Miers structured and critically revised the manuscript, and provided ideas to data processing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by all authors.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by affiliations’ ethical institution board of corresponding authors’ university and all procedures was in accordance with the ethical standards of 1964 Helsinki declaration.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants and at least their single parent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, M., Westenberg, P.M., Wang, Y. et al. Psychometric properties of the adolescents’ interpretation and belief questionnaire (AIBQ) for measuring interpretation Bias in Chinese adolescents. Curr Psychol 41, 8956–8964 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01346-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01346-x

Keywords

Navigation