Abstract
Objective:
Molecular analysis of liver biopsy samples from patients requires ideal tissue preservation and handling to yield suitable material for laboratory analysis. Biopsy size, tissue handling and preservation method all may affect the quality and quantity of DNA, RNA and protein that can be extracted from liver biopsy samples.
Method:
In the present study, murine liver biopsies were performed and stored under various conditions: snap-freezing, RNAlater and Allprotect. Yield was compared to fresh biopsy tissue.
Results:
Fresh tissue generated the highest yield of RNA while samples subjected to the snap-freezing generated the lowest yield of RNA. Preservation in RNAlater yielded higher quantities of RNA than storage in Allprotect, particularly with larger biopsy samples. There was a non-significant trend toward improved RNA quality with RNAlater (p = 0.35). DNA and protein yield were similar with RNAlater and Allprotect under a number of handling condition. Errors in tissue handling such as delays in tissue submersion or freezing did not significantly affect tissue yields in either preservation solution. Tissue yield was unchanged with up to three freeze-thaw cycles in both solutions. Biopsy size (5 vs 2 mm) and width (15 vs 18 g) had a marked effect on tissue yield.
Conclusion:
Ideally 5-mm biopsies with 15-gauge needles should be used to maximize yield. RNAlater provided higher RNA yield with similar yields of DNA and protein and was notably cheaper and easier to handle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Qiagen. RNAlater product handbook. 2006
Qiagen. Allprotect product handbook. 2011
Mutter GL, Zahrieh D, Liu C, Neuberg D, Finkelstein D, Baker HE, Warrington JA. Comparison of frozen and RNALater solid tissue storage methods for use in RNA expression microarrays. BMC Genomics. 2004;5:88
Fleige S, Walf V, Huch S, Prgomet C, Sehm J, Pfaffl MW. Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28:1601
Imbeaud S, Graudens E, Boulanger V, Barlet X, Zaborski P, Eveno E, Mueller O, Schroeder A, Auffry C. Towards standardization of RNA quality assessment using user-independent classifiers of microcapillary electrophoresis traces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e56
Fleige S, Pfaffl MW. RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Mol Aspects Med. 2006;27:126–139
Berg JM, Tymoczko J, Stryer L. Biochemistry. 5th ed.; 2002. p 118–119, 781–808
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Laura Erdman for her generous gift of murine livers. We are also very grateful to Kathleen Zhong for lending us murine qPCR primers. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Hepatitis B Clinical Research Network (NIH 5U01DK082874-02) and the Canadian Liver Foundation.
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sherker, A.R., Cherepanov, V., Alvandi, Z. et al. Optimal preservation of liver biopsy samples for downstream translational applications. Hepatol Int 7, 758–766 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-013-9423-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-013-9423-6