Electrosmog and autoimmune disease
- 7.9k Downloads
Studies in mice have shown that environmental electromagnetic waves tend to suppress the murine immune system with a potency similar to NSAIDs, yet the nature of any Electrosmog effects upon humans remains controversial. Previously, we reported how the human Vitamin-D receptor (VDR) and its ligand, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D (1,25-D), are associated with many chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. We have shown how olmesartan, a drug marketed for mild hypertension, acts as a high-affinity partial agonist for the VDR, and that it seems to reverse disease activity resulting from VDR dysfunction. We here report that structural instability of the activated VDR becomes apparent when observing hydrogen bond behavior with molecular dynamics, revealing that the VDR pathway exhibits a susceptibility to Electrosmog. Further, we note that characteristic modes of instability lie in the microwave frequency range, which is currently populated by cellphone and WiFi communication signals, and that the susceptibility is ligand dependent. A case series of 64 patient-reported outcomes subsequent to use of a silver-threaded cap designed to protect the brain and brain stem from microwave Electrosmog resulted in 90 % reporting “definite” or “strong” changes in their disease symptoms. This is much higher than the 3–5 % rate reported for electromagnetic hypersensitivity in a healthy population and suggests that effective control of environmental Electrosmog immunomodulation may soon become necessary for successful therapy of autoimmune disease.
KeywordsElectrosmog VDR Autoimmune disease PPPM WiFi Electromagnetic hypersensitivity
Every year, the quantity and nature of radio and microwaves contained in this Electrosmog increases. However, research into whether they might interact with human biology, and exactly how they might interact, is a field clouded by the jargon and complexity of each technology and hampered by inadequate experimental guidelines.
“As you sit watching TV, not only are there visible light waves from the TV striking your eyes, but also radio waves, transmitting from a nearby station, and microwaves carrying cellphone calls and text messages, and waves from your neighbor’s WiFi, and GPS units in the cars driving by. There is a chaos of waves from all across the spectrum passing through your room right now.”
The only known natural source of microwave electromagnetic radiation is the negligibly weak cosmic radiation from space, although significant sources of natural radiation have existed at lower radio frequencies due to atmospheric phenomena such as the aurora borealis and thunderstorms. Until the 1950s, Electrosmog frequencies remained out of the microwave region, but by the 1960s television channels began microwave transmissions. Cellular phone technologies emerged during the 1980s; WiFi during the 1990s. Both extensively use microwave frequency bands. The recent release of WiGig and anti-collision vehicle radars in the 60 GHz region embody a 1000-fold increase in frequency, and photon energy, over the exposures mankind experienced up until the 1950s.
It is generally accepted that exposure to low-energy radio waves does not produce any sign of harm. However, low-level exposures to ionizing radiation, for example the exposures caused by nuclear energy accidents, do indeed affect human biology. It may take years of accumulated exposure before the subsequent symptoms become apparent.
Both ionizing X-rays and non-ionizing microwaves are forms of electromagnetic radiation. The energy in X-rays, however, is much higher, usually above a thousand electron volts (1 keV), while the energy in each microwave photon is usually just a few micro-electron volts (μeV) .
A primary effect of low-dose ionizing radiation (from radon and X-rays) is suppression of our body’s immune defenses [2, 3], something which often does not become apparent until the body catastrophically fails to overcome an acute challenge. The emerging use of radon exposure to mitigate rheumatoid arthritis symptoms in humans  is an interesting exploitation of radiation’s immunosuppressive properties.
With low-level non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation, Lushnikov  found a suppressed immune response in mice. Subsequently, Gapeev (aka Gapeyev) [6, 7] showed that the effect on mice of low-intensity non-ionizing electromagnetic waves was roughly equivalent to effect of the NSAID diclofenac. Most recently, some suppression of inflammation was reported in lizards which had been exposed to pulsed DECT radiation simulating the cordless phones used in many homes .
Proteins are continually in motion, responsive to electromagnetic waves
We have previously reported [9, 10, 11, 12, 13] that the drug olmesartan could be retargeted to produce immunostimulation in patients with autoimmune disease. During that research, we used the emerging field of molecular dynamics (MD) to analyze the actions of both the drug olmesartan and the native ligand, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D (1,25-D) on the VDR . Molecular dynamics is computationally intensive, as interactions between each atom in the VDR protein, its activating ligand, and the surrounding water are calculated incrementally as a function of time. We found that hydrogen bond exchange within the VDR exhibited structural resonances at frequencies typically found in modern Electrosmog.
Turton et al.  in Nature Communications 2013 used MD to study the interaction between lysozyme and its ligand triacetylchitotriose at much higher frequencies than Electrosmog. They were then able to confirm that the lysozyme complex was indeed underdamped by using femtosecond optical Kerr Effect spectroscopy. They concluded that the lysozyme complex was marginally unstable, and non-ionizing terahertz electromagnetic radiation is likely to alter “proper biological function.”1
We used MD software to create a movie which allowed us to easily visualize the relative motion of each atom in the VDR as a function of time. The MD output comprises a very large number of incremental combinations of protein and ligand, which can be displayed as frames of a movie film. This allows the relative motions of each atom in the interaction to be studied.
How Electrosmog interacts with human metabolism
There is no need to go into detail to understand the action of Electrosmog on human proteins. All one needs to notice is that, in Fig. 1, the two oxygen atoms of the carboxyl group at “B” have spun by 90° in the time between the two frames. Although all the atoms of the VDR are constantly in motion, these two oxygens are key because they are involved in forming hydrogen bonds with the DRIP205 coactivator. When the VDR is not activated, this carboxyl group binds with the lysine to its left (LYS264) and cannot position the coactivator where it needs to be for proper gene transcription. Activation forces these residues apart so they can bind with the coactivator. The shape of the whole VDR molecule changes as it is activated by the drug.
Whenever an electromagnetic field is present, a Lorentz Force  will act upon any charged atom in motion, such as these moving oxygen atoms, a force which could either boost or hinder the proper activation of the VDR molecule. Whether activation is assisted or blocked depends on the frequency content of the molecular interactions, and that of the impinging electromagnetic waves.
So why do not human beings suffer immediate symptoms when exposed to Electrosmog? Recall the time interval between the two frames in Fig. 1—900 femtoseconds—corresponding to a wave frequency near 1 terahertz (THz). Very few waves oscillating at that frequency are able to reach the molecules of a human body, and none of them are currently present in Electrosmog. Consequently, Electrosmog does not yet directly affect motions of the individual atoms.
However, at least in the case of the VDR activation, the bulk of the molecule changes shape with characteristic frequencies already found in today’s Electrosmog. Groups of hundreds of atoms which form the helical “backbone” of the VDR do shift together at the lower frequencies present in Electrosmog.
The VDR is even more susceptible when bound with its natural ligand
Electromagnetic waves in Electrosmog exert sufficient force to affect biological function
The force exerted on a moving charge by an electromagnetic wave is dependent on the charge’s velocity, the wave’s frequency and the wave’s amplitude . With environmental Electrosmog, the amplitude is an uncontrolled variable, and amplitudes can easily exceed −16 dBm3 (1 V/m at 1 GHz) when close to cell phones, cell towers and WiFi access points.
There are many studies which document biological effects at these higher levels, and the 2012 “BioInitiative” consensus  collated and summarized many of them. However, very few studies tried to define the lowest level at which electromagnetic waves might start to affect biology. Bise  reported in 1978 that human EEG was changed by wave amplitudes as low as −100 dBm, with −60 dBm giving multiple subjects immediate frontal headache. Sadly, such levels are impossible to replicate in 2016 without the use of a Faraday cage, as the Electrosmog background levels in our cities rarely fall below −50 dBm (100,000 times stronger than the −100 dBm signals used by Bise).
While investigating the report of Gapeev  that the near-field zone of an antenna seemed more biologically active than the far-field zone, we received reports that 27.12 MHz signals from our near-field (capacitive wave) antenna, similar in design to Figure 9 of Sacco and Tomilin , could be sensed by patients, but not by healthy individuals. This occurred at levels around −90 dBm, levels below wideband thermal noise. Even though Bise reported human responses at similarly low levels, our observation needs independent replication before we would claim it as definitive.
However, the BioInitiative report noted “At least five new cell tower studies are reporting bioeffects in the range of 0.003–0.05 μW/cm2 researchers report headaches, concentration difficulties and behavioral problems in children and adolescents; and sleep disturbances, headaches and concentration problems in adults.” This level corresponds to −36 dBm, an exposure frequently being reported by slow responders in our olmesartan immunostimulation follow-up cohort. After consultation, and some initial data gathering with electromagnetic level meters, we decided to suggest that these slow responders might be wise to take steps to protect themselves from Electrosmog.
The sleeping caps case series
A full 90 % of the 64 patients reported a “Definite” or “Strong” change in their symptoms. This compares with the 3 % incidence for electromagnetic hypersensitivity typically expected in the population as a whole .
While a placebo or nocebo effect might be expected to bias our PRO data, follow-up reports have indicated a durable response over many months. Additionally, Dieudonne  has questioned the likelihood of nocebo causation in EHS.
Immunopathology from Electrosmog
When the Electrosmog in a patient’s environment is reduced, the immune system tends to become more active. This may result in immunopathology. Indeed, some patients have reported a surge in disease symptoms, occasionally an intolerable surge, after WiFi routers and cell phones have been switched off in their homes. Others have reported that travel to a very quiet area, such as a remote canyon, caused a surge in their immune symptoms.
While further research is needed to clarify these reactions, autoimmune patients seem predisposed to Electrosmog hypersensitivity at levels currently existing in typical home and work environments, and this factor may be affecting their therapeutic response.
The experiments described in this paper confirm that biological molecules are constantly moving and interact with timescales measured in picoseconds. As a result, forces will be exerted on the charged atoms within these molecules by incident electromagnetic fields, including Electrosmog.
There is no reason to suspect that a pulsed electromagnetic wave of 1 μs duration (1000 times slower than a typical molecular response) might cause any less damage to biology than a continuous wave of the same magnitude. It is therefore important to have very-fast-acting peak-reading signal level meters when measuring the biological interaction potential of electromagnetic waves.
Much of the research literature in this field is criticized as not being sufficiently authoritative because experiments have not been conducted under the current pragma of placebo control and simplistic (p = 0.05) analysis of results. Research in this area will only move forward when critics start to examine qualitative study outcomes—for example, observations which might indicate that a Faraday cage should have been an element of a study’s experimental methodology, or that a 2–3 days acclimatization or immune—washout might have changed the study results.
Furthermore, it seems likely that signals a million times lower than those currently being used in research may be sufficient to elicit a tangible change in human biology. In order to better understand the amplitude at which bioeffects become apparent, it is important that experimental guidelines be delineated which ensure that Electrosmog does not confound a study’s results.
Finally, we need to plan how to handle subjects whose symptoms become untenable (due to immunopathology) during acclimatization to an Electrosmog-quiet environment, or during immune washout. We cannot ignore the increasing body of evidence showing electromagnetic effects on the immune system. The “controversial” nature of electromagnetic hypersensitivity will not diminish until we grasp the complexity of the task we face in defining exactly how electromagnetic waves interact with human biology.
Our emulation protocol was essentially similar to that of Turton et al. except that we used Gromacs 3.3 running on a multiprocessor Linux operating system. Because the VDR is a much larger molecule than lysozyme, we had to emulate 239 amino acids containing a total of 2415 atoms. They were bathed in thousands of molecules of water. For each of our dozens of experiments, we computed 500,000 emulation steps to get 750 picoseconds of real time data. Each run often took several days of CPU time. We used the NDLP bounding box of Wassenaar [16, 17] to keep the number of water molecule calculations to a minimum.
The mathematics package ‘GNU Octave” was used to compute the FFTs in this study. It is an open source mathematics package similar to Wolfram’s MATLAB.
Just as there are many units of measurement for ionizing radiation, so there are many ways of measuring non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. For ionizing, one can choose dose units of Rad, Grey, Roentgen, Rem, Sieverts and the common dps (disintegrations per second, often metered as counts per minute). For non-ionizing, one can use Volts/metre as a measure of field strength, Watts/metre2, or Decibels relative to 1 mW (dBm). The authors usually use dBm, as, being logarithmic, the dBm measure can easily denote wide variations in field strengths (it is easier to visualize −7 0dBm than “0.002 V/m”). Once the wave’s frequency is known, it is simple to convert between each non-ionizing unit of measurement.
The authors wish to thank Joyful Smith, Amy Proal and Paul Albert for their assistance, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar for helping with Gromacs internals, the Drug Design Laboratory at the University of Milan for its Vega-ZZ software, and Greg P. Blaney MD (recently deceased) for having worked tirelessly on our project.
This study was supported by the Autoimmunity Research Foundation, an IRS 501(c)3 charitable nonprofit organization.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.
Informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.
- 1.Science@NASA. N.A.S.A.: an introduction to the electromagnetic spectrum. 2010 [cited 2016 May 13]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfXzwh3KadE.
- 3.Thangaraj G, Manakov V, Cucu A, Fournier C, Layer PG. Inflammatory effects of TNFα are counteracted by X-ray irradiation and AChE inhibition in mouse micromass cultures. Chem Biol Interact. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2016.03.027.
- 14.Marshall TG. Molecular static and dynamic analyses reveal flaw in murine model used by US FDA to detect drug carcinogenicity. Nat Prec. 2007. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/52/version/1.
- 18.Purcell EM. Electricity and magnetism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 19.BioInitiative Working Group, Cindy Sage, David O. Carpenter. BioInitiative report: a rationale for biologically-based public exposure standards for electromagnetic radiation. 2012 [cited 2016 May 12]. http://www.bioinitiative.org.
- 22.Sacco B, Tomilin AK. The study of electromagnetic processes in the experiments of Tesla; 2012. Available from: http://vixra.org/abs/1210.0158.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.