Climate Change as a Three-Part Ethical Problem: A Response to Jamieson and Gardiner
Dale Jamieson has claimed that conventional human-directed ethical concepts are an inadequate means for accurately understanding our duty to respond to climate change. Furthermore, he suggests that a responsibility to respect nature can instead provide the appropriate framework with which to understand such a duty. Stephen Gardiner has responded by claiming that climate change is a clear case of ethical responsibility, but the failure of institutions to respond to it creates a (not unprecedented) political problem. In assessing the debate between Gardiner and Jamieson, I develop an analysis which shows a three-part structure to the problem of climate change, in which the problem Gardiner identifies is only one of three sub-problems of climate change. This analysis highlights difficulties with Jamieson’s argument that the duty of respect for nature is necessary for a full understanding of climate ethics, and suggests how a human-directed approach based on the three-part analysis can avoid Jamieson’s charge of inadequacy.
KeywordsClimate change Responsibility Jamieson Revision Nature Gardiner
- Broome, J. (2010). The most important thing about climate change. In J. Boston, A. Bradstock & D. Eng (Eds.), Public policy: Why ethics matters. http://epress.anu.edu.au/apps/bookworm/view/Public+Policy%3A+Why+ethics+matters/5251/ch06.xhtml#tocanchor
- Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world (Amnesty International Global Ethics Series). Ebook: WW Norton.Google Scholar
- Caney, S. (2010b). Climate change, human rights, and moral thresholds. In S. G. S. Caney & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings (pp. 163–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gardiner, S. (2011). Is no one responsible for global environmental tragedy? Climate change as a challenge to our ethical concepts. In D. G. Arnold (Ed.), The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gingrich, N., & Maple, T. L. (2007). A contract with the earth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- IPCC (2013). Working Group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report climate change 2013: The physical science basis (Summary for policymakers). http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5-SPM_Approved27Sep2013.pdf. (Accessed 30 Sept 2013).
- Jamieson, D. (2011). The nature of the problem. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lomborg, B. (2007). Cool it. London: Cyan.Google Scholar
- Markowitz, E. M. (2012). Is climate change an ethical issue? Examining young adults’ beliefs about climate and morality. Climatic Change, 114(3–4), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. (2008). Global justice and climate change: How should responsibilities be distributed? The Tanner lectures on human values, Presented at Tsinghua University, Beijing, March 24–25, 2008.Google Scholar
- Moellendorf, D. (2012). Climate change and global justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(2), 131–143.Google Scholar
- Nolt, J. (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions and the domination of posterity. In D. G. Arnold (Ed.), The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Obama, B. (2013, January 21). Obama’s second inaugural speech. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/us/politics/obamas-second-inaugural-speech.html?pagewanted=all. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
- Parry, M., Canziani, O., Palutikof, J., et al. (2007). Technical summary. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. van der Palutikof, P. J. Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of working Group II to the fourth assessment Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 23–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Poore, R. Z., Williams Jr, R. S., & Tracey, C. (2000). Sea level and climate. US Geological survey factsheet (fs002-000). http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs2-00/. (Accessed 19 Oct 2013).
- Quinn, W. (1989). Actions, intentions, and consequences: The doctrine of double effect. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18(4), 334–351.Google Scholar
- Seyfang, G. (2007). Personal carbon trading: Lessons From Complementary Currencies. [research paper] Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
- Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2010). It’s not my fault: Global warming and individual moral obligations. In S. Gardiner, S. Caney, & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., et al. (2007). Contribution of working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: IPCC/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Vidal, J. (2009). Evo Morales stuns Copenhagen with demand to limit temperature rise to 1C. The Guardian, 16 Dec, 2009. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/16/evo-morales-hugo-chavez. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
- Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (2013). The voluntary human extinction movement. http://www.vhemt.org/. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
- Walzer, M. (2000). Just and unjust wars (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar