Climate Change as a Three-Part Ethical Problem: A Response to Jamieson and Gardiner
Dale Jamieson has claimed that conventional human-directed ethical concepts are an inadequate means for accurately understanding our duty to respond to climate change. Furthermore, he suggests that a responsibility to respect nature can instead provide the appropriate framework with which to understand such a duty. Stephen Gardiner has responded by claiming that climate change is a clear case of ethical responsibility, but the failure of institutions to respond to it creates a (not unprecedented) political problem. In assessing the debate between Gardiner and Jamieson, I develop an analysis which shows a three-part structure to the problem of climate change, in which the problem Gardiner identifies is only one of three sub-problems of climate change. This analysis highlights difficulties with Jamieson’s argument that the duty of respect for nature is necessary for a full understanding of climate ethics, and suggests how a human-directed approach based on the three-part analysis can avoid Jamieson’s charge of inadequacy.
KeywordsClimate change Responsibility Jamieson Revision Nature Gardiner
I would like to thank Ramon Das, the audience at the Australasian Association of Philosophy New Zealand Conference 2012 for their comments on an early version of this paper, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.
- Broome, J. (2010). The most important thing about climate change. In J. Boston, A. Bradstock & D. Eng (Eds.), Public policy: Why ethics matters. http://epress.anu.edu.au/apps/bookworm/view/Public+Policy%3A+Why+ethics+matters/5251/ch06.xhtml#tocanchor
- Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world (Amnesty International Global Ethics Series). Ebook: WW Norton.Google Scholar
- Caney, S. (2010b). Climate change, human rights, and moral thresholds. In S. G. S. Caney & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings (pp. 163–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gardiner, S. (2011). Is no one responsible for global environmental tragedy? Climate change as a challenge to our ethical concepts. In D. G. Arnold (Ed.), The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gingrich, N., & Maple, T. L. (2007). A contract with the earth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- IPCC (2013). Working Group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report climate change 2013: The physical science basis (Summary for policymakers). http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5-SPM_Approved27Sep2013.pdf. (Accessed 30 Sept 2013).
- Jamieson, D. (2011). The nature of the problem. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lomborg, B. (2007). Cool it. London: Cyan.Google Scholar
- Markowitz, E. M. (2012). Is climate change an ethical issue? Examining young adults’ beliefs about climate and morality. Climatic Change, 114(3–4), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. (2008). Global justice and climate change: How should responsibilities be distributed? The Tanner lectures on human values, Presented at Tsinghua University, Beijing, March 24–25, 2008.Google Scholar
- Moellendorf, D. (2012). Climate change and global justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(2), 131–143.Google Scholar
- Nolt, J. (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions and the domination of posterity. In D. G. Arnold (Ed.), The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Obama, B. (2013, January 21). Obama’s second inaugural speech. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/us/politics/obamas-second-inaugural-speech.html?pagewanted=all. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
- Parry, M., Canziani, O., Palutikof, J., et al. (2007). Technical summary. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. van der Palutikof, P. J. Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of working Group II to the fourth assessment Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 23–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Poore, R. Z., Williams Jr, R. S., & Tracey, C. (2000). Sea level and climate. US Geological survey factsheet (fs002-000). http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs2-00/. (Accessed 19 Oct 2013).
- Quinn, W. (1989). Actions, intentions, and consequences: The doctrine of double effect. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18(4), 334–351.Google Scholar
- Seyfang, G. (2007). Personal carbon trading: Lessons From Complementary Currencies. [research paper] Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
- Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2010). It’s not my fault: Global warming and individual moral obligations. In S. Gardiner, S. Caney, & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., et al. (2007). Contribution of working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: IPCC/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Vidal, J. (2009). Evo Morales stuns Copenhagen with demand to limit temperature rise to 1C. The Guardian, 16 Dec, 2009. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/16/evo-morales-hugo-chavez. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
- Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (2013). The voluntary human extinction movement. http://www.vhemt.org/. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
- Walzer, M. (2000). Just and unjust wars (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar