Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 1129–1148

Climate Change as a Three-Part Ethical Problem: A Response to Jamieson and Gardiner

Original Paper
  • 364 Downloads

Abstract

Dale Jamieson has claimed that conventional human-directed ethical concepts are an inadequate means for accurately understanding our duty to respond to climate change. Furthermore, he suggests that a responsibility to respect nature can instead provide the appropriate framework with which to understand such a duty. Stephen Gardiner has responded by claiming that climate change is a clear case of ethical responsibility, but the failure of institutions to respond to it creates a (not unprecedented) political problem. In assessing the debate between Gardiner and Jamieson, I develop an analysis which shows a three-part structure to the problem of climate change, in which the problem Gardiner identifies is only one of three sub-problems of climate change. This analysis highlights difficulties with Jamieson’s argument that the duty of respect for nature is necessary for a full understanding of climate ethics, and suggests how a human-directed approach based on the three-part analysis can avoid Jamieson’s charge of inadequacy.

Keywords

Climate change Responsibility Jamieson Revision Nature Gardiner 

References

  1. Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (2011). Does anthropogenic climate change violate human rights? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14(2), 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broome, J. (2010). The most important thing about climate change. In J. Boston, A. Bradstock & D. Eng (Eds.), Public policy: Why ethics matters. http://epress.anu.edu.au/apps/bookworm/view/Public+Policy%3A+Why+ethics+matters/5251/ch06.xhtml#tocanchor
  4. Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world (Amnesty International Global Ethics Series). Ebook: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Caney, S. (2009a). Climate change and the future: Discounting for time, wealth, and risk. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caney, S. (2009b). Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics, 5(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caney, S. (2010a). Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caney, S. (2010b). Climate change, human rights, and moral thresholds. In S. G. S. Caney & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings (pp. 163–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doran, P., & Kendall-Zimmerman, M. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 90, 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardiner, S. (2004). Ethics and global climate change. Ethics, 114(3), 555–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardiner, S. (2006). A perfect moral storm: Climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values, 15(3), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardiner, S. (2011). Is no one responsible for global environmental tragedy? Climate change as a challenge to our ethical concepts. In D. G. Arnold (Ed.), The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gingrich, N., & Maple, T. L. (2007). A contract with the earth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Russell, G., Lea, D. W., & Siddall, M. (2007). Climate change and trace gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1856), 1925–1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2013). Working Group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report climate change 2013: The physical science basis (Summary for policymakers). http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5-SPM_Approved27Sep2013.pdf. (Accessed 30 Sept 2013).
  17. Jamieson, D. (2007). When utilitarians should be virtue theorists. Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies, 19(2), 160–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamieson, D. (2010). Climate change, responsibility, and justice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3), 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jamieson, D. (2011). The nature of the problem. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kagan, S. (2011). Do I make a difference? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39(2), 105–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lomborg, B. (2007). Cool it. London: Cyan.Google Scholar
  22. Markowitz, E. M. (2012). Is climate change an ethical issue? Examining young adults’ beliefs about climate and morality. Climatic Change, 114(3–4), 1–17.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, D. (2001). Distributing responsibilities. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(4), 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, D. (2008). Global justice and climate change: How should responsibilities be distributed? The Tanner lectures on human values, Presented at Tsinghua University, Beijing, March 24–25, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. Moellendorf, D. (2009). Treaty norms and climate change mitigation. Ethics and International Affairs, 23(3), 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moellendorf, D. (2012). Climate change and global justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(2), 131–143.Google Scholar
  27. Nolt, J. (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions and the domination of posterity. In D. G. Arnold (Ed.), The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Obama, B. (2013, January 21). Obama’s second inaugural speech. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/us/politics/obamas-second-inaugural-speech.html?pagewanted=all. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
  29. Page, E. (2011). Climatic justice and the fair distribution of atmospheric burdens: A conjunctive account. The Monist, 94(3), 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parry, M., Canziani, O., Palutikof, J., et al. (2007). Technical summary. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. van der Palutikof, P. J. Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of working Group II to the fourth assessment Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 23–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  32. Poore, R. Z., Williams Jr, R. S., & Tracey, C. (2000). Sea level and climate. US Geological survey factsheet (fs002-000). http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs2-00/. (Accessed 19 Oct 2013).
  33. Quinn, W. (1989). Actions, intentions, and consequences: The doctrine of double effect. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18(4), 334–351.Google Scholar
  34. Schüssler, R. (2011). Climate justice: A question of historic responsibility? Journal of Global Ethics, 7(3), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seyfang, G. (2007). Personal carbon trading: Lessons From Complementary Currencies. [research paper] Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  36. Sherwood, S. C., & Huber, M. (2010). An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(21), 9552–9556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shue, H. (1993). Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law and Policy, 15, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2010). It’s not my fault: Global warming and individual moral obligations. In S. Gardiner, S. Caney, & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., et al. (2007). Contribution of working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: IPCC/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Van de Poel, I., Nihlén Fahlquist, J., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., & Royakkers, L. (2012). The problem of many hands: Climate change as an example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vidal, J. (2009). Evo Morales stuns Copenhagen with demand to limit temperature rise to 1C. The Guardian, 16 Dec, 2009. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/16/evo-morales-hugo-chavez. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
  42. Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (2013). The voluntary human extinction movement. http://www.vhemt.org/. (Accessed 25 Feb 2013).
  43. Walzer, M. (2000). Just and unjust wars (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Weitzman, M. L. (2009). On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations