Skip to main content
Log in

Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the word-structure knowledge of novice teachers and the progress of children tutored by a subgroup of the teachers. Teachers’ word-structure knowledge was assessed using three tasks: graphophonemic segmentation, classification of pseudowords by syllable type, and classification of real words as phonetically regular or irregular. Tutored children were assessed on several measures of basic reading and spelling skills. Novice teachers who received word-structure instruction outperformed a comparison group of teachers in word-structure knowledge at post-test. Tutored children improved significantly from pre-test to post-test on all assessments. Teachers’ post-test knowledge on the graphophonemic segmentation and irregular words tasks correlated significantly with tutored children’s progress in decoding phonetically regular words; error analyses indicated links between teachers’ patterns of word-structure knowledge and children’s patterns of decoding progress. The study suggests that word-structure knowledge is important to effective teaching of word decoding and underscores the need to include this information in teacher preparation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Keating, T. (2000). When less may be more: A 2-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 494–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C., Mather, N., Narr, R., & Babur, N. (1999). Interactive, collaborative professional development in early literacy instruction: Supporting the balancing act. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation. A position paper of the International Dyslexia Association. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium on Reading Excellence. (1999). CORE assessing reading: Multiple measures for kindergarten through eighth grade. Novato, CA: Arena Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium on Reading Excellence. (2000). CORE teaching reading sourcebook for kindergarten through eighth grade. Novato, CA: Arena Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, G. (1943). Remedial techniques in basic school subjects. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P. E. (1993). The sounds and spelling patterns of English: Phonics for teachers and parents. Morrill, ME: Oxton House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P. E. (1995). Speed drills for decoding automaticity. Farmington, ME: Oxton House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (2001). Can minimally trained college student volunteers help young at-risk children read better? Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 28–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, E., Fischer, P. E., & Blackburn, M. (1977). The GFB program: Sequence of objectives for testing and teaching reading. Hamden, CT: Montage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. V., & Roller, C. M. (2001). The IRA excellence in reading teacher preparation commission’s report: Current practices in reading teacher education at the undergraduate level in the United States. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 32–79). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Reading Association. (2003). Investment in teacher preparation in the United States. Newark, DE: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Invernizzi, M., Juel, C., & Rosemary, C. (1996). A community volunteer tutorial that works. The Reading Teacher, 50, 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Invernizzi, M., Rosemary, C., Juel, C., & Richards, H. C. (1997). At-risk readers and community volunteers: A 3-year perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 227–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. R., Vadasy, P. F., Firebaugh, M., & Profilet, C. (2000). Tutoring first-grade struggling readers in phonological reading skills. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 75–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., Bos, C., & Babur, N. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 75–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., & Green, L. B. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. (1999). Those who know teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related content knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Harry, D. R., Cunningham, A. E., Cox, S., Sidman, S., & Covill, A. E. (2002). Reading teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature and English phonology. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C., & Lyon, G. R. (1996). Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics in Language Disorders, 16, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Elementary Teacher Preparation for Reading Instruction. (2003). Prepared to make a difference: Research evidence on how some of America’s best college programs prepare teachers of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, T. (2003). Assessing learners with special needs: An applied approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, R. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S., Ehri, L. C., Olson, R. K., & Fowler, A. E. (1998). The fate of phonemic awareness beyond the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Katz, L., Stuebing, K., Fletcher, J., Brady, S., Fowler, A., Dreyer, L., Marchione, K., Shaywitz, S., & Shaywitz, B. (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Patterns of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 72–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadasy, P. F., Jenkins, J. R., Antil, L. R., Wayne, S. K., & O’Connor, R. E. (1997). The effectiveness of one-to-one tutoring by community novice teachers for at-risk beginning readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., Peyton, J. A., & Jenkins, J. R. (2002). Timing and intensity of tutoring: A closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Louise Spear-Swerling or Pamela Owen Brucker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P.O. Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Ann. of Dyslexia 54, 332–364 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0016-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0016-x

Keywords

Navigation