Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preemptive multimodal analgesia facilitates same-day discharge following robot-assisted hysterectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether early hospital discharge following minimally invasive surgery can be achieved through the use of preemptive multimodal analgesia without compromising patient safety or comfort. Data were retrospectively collected for 150 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications from 9 December 2009 to 6 October 2010 at Cox Health Systems (Springfield, MO, USA). One surgeon performed 100 consecutive cases with all patients receiving preemptive multimodal treatment with celecoxib and ropivacaine. These cases were compared with 50 patients treated with an opioid-based postoperative analgesia regimen by one of four other surgeons at the same center. Patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, opioid requirement, and time to discharge were compared between groups. The patients in the multimodal group had significantly reduced opioid requirements intraoperatively (25.0 mg vs. 29.9 mg, P = 0.0077), postoperatively on the day of surgery (10.9 mg vs. 17.9 mg, P = 0.0030), and on the first postoperative day (3.1 mg vs. 15.3 mg, P = 0.0001). There were no differences in procedure time, transfusions, or readmission rates between groups. Time in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) was decreased in the multimodal group (72.0 min vs. 88.4 min, P < 0.0001), as was time to discharge from the hospital (8.5 h vs. 30.2 h, P < 0.0001). Age and body mass index were both significantly lower in the multimodal group; however, regression analyses demonstrated that analgesia regimen was the only parameter that predicted opioid requirement and time to discharge. Preemptive multimodal analgesia reduced the total dose of rescue opioids, facilitating same-day discharge without compromising patient comfort or safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowe MP, Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Singh DK, Buttin BM, Lurain JR, Schink JC (2009) A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. J Robotic Surg 3:19–23. doi:10.1007/s11701-009-0131-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Rademaker A, Singh DK, Buttin BM, Lurain JR, Schink JC, Lowe MP (2009) The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery. Int J Med Robot 5:392–397. doi:10.1002/rcs.268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdollahi SF, Bahlouli A, Mostafa PG, Rasooli S, Morteza G (2009) Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies. Saudi Med J 30:813–816

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92:205–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:240–248. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1166-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shashoua AR, Gill D, Locher SR (2009) Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS 13:364–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo ZD, Chaplan SR, Higuera ES, Sorkin LS, Stauderman KA, Williams ME, Yaksh TL (2001) Upregulation of dorsal root ganglion (alpha)2(delta) calcium channel subunit and its correlation with allodynia in spinal nerve-injured rats. J Neurosci 21:1868–1875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ong CK, Lirk P, Seymour RA, Jenkins BJ (2005) The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 100:757–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trabulsi EJ, Patel J, Viscusi ER, Gomella LG, Lallas CD (2010) Preemptive multimodal pain regimen reduces opioid analgesia for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 76:1122–1124. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu PL, Xiao J, Zhu YL, Wu HS, Li XH, Wu YL, Qian QR (2010) Efficacy of a multimodal analgesia protocol in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. J Int Med Res 38:1404–1412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Helvacioglu A, Weis R (1992) Operative laparoscopy and postoperative pain relief. Fertil Steril 57:548–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein A, Grimault P, Henique A, Keller M, Fortin A, Darai E (2000) Preventing postoperative pain by local anesthetic instillation after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Anesth Analg 91:403–407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pettersson N, Emanuelsson BM, Reventlid H, Hahn RG (1998) High-dose ropivacaine wound infiltration for pain relief after inguinal hernia repair: a clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 23:189–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:286–291. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97:1772–1783. doi:10.1002/bjs.7269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boggess JF (2008) A comparative study of three surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer; robotic-assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:360.e361–360.e369. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.012

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A (2009) Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 114:1041–1048. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b9d222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith LH, Waetjen LE, Paik CK, Xing G (2008) Trends in the safety of inpatient hysterectomy for benign conditions in California, 1991–2004. Obstet Gynecol 112:553–561. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318183fdf2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Estebe JP, Le Corre P, Le Naoures A, Eliat C, Chevanne F, Husson JL, Ecoffey C (2009) Local anaesthetic use for the iliac crest-donor site: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 60:39–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Katz JA, Bridenbaugh PO, Knarr DC, Helton SH, Denson DD (1990) Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of epidural ropivacaine in humans. Anesth Analg 70:16–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Concepcion M, Arthur GR, Steele SM, Bader AM, Covino BG (1990) A new local anesthetic, ropivacaine. Its epidural effects in humans. Anesth Analg 70:80–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GM, Bloomfield P, Lundh R (1989) Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 69:563–569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkula M, Blomberg S, Sjovall J, Edvardsson N (1997) Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 78:507–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bamigboye AA, Justus HG (2008) Ropivacaine abdominal wound infiltration and peritoneal spraying at cesarean delivery for preemptive analgesia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 102:160–164. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.03.019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooks PM, Day RO (2000) COX-2 inhibitors. Med J Aust 173:433–436

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Elia N, Lysakowski C, Tramer MR (2005) Does multimodal analgesia with acetaminophen, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and patient-controlled analgesia morphine offer advantages over morphine alone? Meta-analyses of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 103:1296–1304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Adams JB (2010) A rapid recovery program: early home and pain free. Orthopedics 33:656. doi:10.3928/01477447-20100722-38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Senard M, Deflandre EP, Ledoux D, Roediger L, Hubert BM, Radermecker M, Libbrecht D, Joris JL (2010) Effect of celecoxib combined with thoracic epidural analgesia on pain after thoracotomy. Br J Anaesth 105:196–200. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Gemer O, Bhagan L (2009) Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience. JSLS 13:125–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Giep BN, Giep HN, Hubert HB (2010) Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Robot Surg 4:167–175. doi:10.1007/s11701-010-0206-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Payne TN, Dauterive FR, Pitter MC, Giep HN, Giep BN, Grogg TW, Shanbour KA, Goff DW, Hubert HB (2010) Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices. Obstet Gynecol 115:535–542. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45ad

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF (2007) Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:113 e111–e114. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.005

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg 191:555–560. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Morrison JE Jr, Jacobs VR (2004) Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in a rural ambulatory surgery center. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:359–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Gilbert SM, Strope S, Miller DC (2008) Effects of laparoscopy on surgical discharge practice patterns. Urology 71:1029–1034. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. White PF, Kehlet H, Neal JM, Schricker T, Carr DB, Carli F (2007) The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesth Analg 104:1380–1396, table of contents. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000263034.96885.e1

    Google Scholar 

  37. McClellan SN, Hamilton B, Rettenmaier MA, Lopez K, John CR, Hu JC, Goldstein BH (2007) Individual physician experience with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a single outpatient setting. Surg Innov 14:102–106. doi:10.1177/1553350607303785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lieng M, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Jungersen M, Busund B (2005) Outpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with assistance of the lap loop. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:290–294. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW (1992) Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 80:895–901

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thiel JA, Kamencic H (2006) Assessment of costs associated with outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectom. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 28:794–798

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank John Orr for statistical assistance and April Hebert, Ph.D. a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, for literature review.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Shultz is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical and is a member of their speaker’s bureau.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M. Shultz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shultz, T.M. Preemptive multimodal analgesia facilitates same-day discharge following robot-assisted hysterectomy. J Robotic Surg 6, 115–123 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0276-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0276-5

Keywords

Navigation