Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-bariatric Abdominoplasty: Identification of Risk Factors for Complications

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to evaluate the complication rate after abdominoplasty procedures performed in a high volume post-bariatric center and to identify predictors of complications.

Material and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed and included all abdominoplasty procedures performed between January 2011 and December 2019. Complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were documented and potential risk factors were statistically evaluated.

Results

A total of 898 patients were included. Overall complication rate was 29.8%. Type I complications (minor wound problems) occurred in 15.8% (n = 140). Type II complications requiring medical intervention occurred in 10% (n = 90). Five patients had deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; others received antibiotic treatment for wound infections. In total 42 type III complications occurred in 36 patients, with re-intervention for wound problems (n = 16), seroma (n = 16), umbilical necrosis (n = 4), and bleeding (n = 6). The weight of tissue resected (p < 0.001), the interval between bariatric and body contouring surgery (p < 0.05), preoperative BMI (p < 0.05), male gender (p < 0.05), diabetes mellitus type 2 (p = 0.05), and smoking (p < 0.05) were important predictors for developing complications.

Conclusion

In this large retrospective post-bariatric abdominoplasty series, the overall complication rate is low compared to other published series as a consequence of our completely standardized approach and technique. Our analysis shows a significant linear correlation between the amount of skin tissue resected and postoperative complications. Moreover, the longer the interval between bariatric surgery and abdominoplasty, the higher the complication rate. High preoperative BMI, diabetes mellitus type 2, smoking, and male gender were identified as independent significant risk factors for complications.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosa SC, de Macedo JLS, Canedo LR, et al. Quality of life and predictive factors for complications in patients undergoing abdominoplasty after gastric bypass: a retrospective cohort. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(3):447–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, et al. Satisfaction and quality-of-life issues in body contouring surgery patients: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1527–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neaman KC, Hansen JE. Analysis of complications from abdominoplasty: a review of 206 cases at a university hospital. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(3):292–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coon D, Gusenoff JA, Kannan N, et al. Body mass and surgical complications in the postbariatric reconstructive patient: analysis of 511 cases. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. García Botero A, García Wenninger M, Fernández LD. Complications after body contouring surgery in postbariatric patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;79(3):293–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Staalesen T, Olsén MF, Elander A. Complications of abdominoplasty after weight loss as a result of bariatric surgery or dieting/postpregnancy. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46(6):416–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasanbegovic E, Sørensen JA. Complications following body contouring surgery after massive weight loss: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(3):295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lievain L, Aktouf A, Auquit-Auckbur I, et al. Abdominoplasty complications: particularities of the post-bariatric patients within a 238 patients series. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2015;60(1):26–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arthurs ZM, Cuadrado D, Sohn V, et al. Post-bariatric panniculectomy: pre-panniculectomy body mass index impacts the complication profile. Am J Surg. 2007;193(5):567–70. discussion 570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Derickson M, Phillips C, Barron M, et al. Panniculectomy after bariatric surgical weight loss: analysis of complications and modifiable risk factors. Am J Surg. 2018;215(5):887–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parvizi D, Friedl H, Wurzer P, et al. A multiple regression analysis of postoperative complications after body-contouring surgery: a retrospective analysis of 205 patients : regression analysis of complications. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1482–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolliger M, Kroehnert J-A, Molineus F, et al. Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients. Eur Surg. 2018;50(6):256–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1097–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Momeni A, Heier M, Bannasch H, et al. Complications in abdominoplasty: a risk factor analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(10):1250–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hensel JM, Lehman JA, Tantri MP, et al. An outcomes analysis and satisfaction survey of 199 consecutive abdominoplasties. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46(4):357–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Neaman KC, Armstrong SD, Baca ME, et al. Outcomes of traditional cosmetic abdominoplasty in a community setting: a retrospective analysis of 1008 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3):403e–10e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seretis K, Goulis D, Demiri EC, et al. Prevention of seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(3):316–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vidal P, Berner JE, Will PA. Managing complications in abdominoplasty: a literature review. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(5):457–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pollock TA, Pollock H. Progressive tension sutures in abdominoplasty: a review of 597 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(6):729–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho W, Jones CD, Pitt E, et al. Meta-analysis on the comparative efficacy of drains, progressive tension sutures and subscarpal fat preservation in reducing complications of abdominoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(5):828–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Donato DP, Simpson AM, Garlick JW, et al. Abdominal contouring and male gender: analysis of complications using the National Quality Improvement Program Database. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(4):481–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cammarata MJ, Kantar RS, Rifkin WJ, et al. Advanced age is a risk factor for complications following abdominal panniculectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(2):426–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sørensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):373–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Manassa EH, Hertl CH, Olbrisch R-R. Wound healing problems in smokers and nonsmokers after 132 abdominoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):2082–7. discussion 2088-2089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaouat M, Levan P, Lalanne B, et al. Abdominal dermolipectomies: early postoperative complications and long-term unfavorable results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(7):1614–8. discussion 1619-1623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Leow YH, Maibach HI. Cigarette smoking, cutaneous vasculature, and tissue oxygen. Clin Dermatol. 1998;16(5):579–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bamba R, Gupta V, Shack RB, et al. Evaluation of diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for major complications in patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(5):598–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, Zheng Q-J, Wang S, et al. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk of surgical site infections: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(8):810–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Massenburg BB, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Jablonka EM, et al. Risk factors for readmission and adverse outcomes in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):968–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nemerofsky RB, Oliak DA, Capella JF. Body lift: an account of 200 consecutive cases in the massive weight loss patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(2):414–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Grotting JC, Saheb-Al-Zamani M. Discussion: Abdominoplasty in the overweight and obese population: outcomes and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(4):854–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vastine VL, Morgan RF, Williams GS, et al. Wound complications of abdominoplasty in obese patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42(1):34–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Greco JA, Castaldo ET, Nanney LB, et al. The effect of weight loss surgery and body mass index on wound complications after abdominal contouring operations. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61(3):235–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. de Kerviler S, Hüsler R, Banic A, et al. Body contouring surgery following bariatric surgery and dietetically induced massive weight reduction: a risk analysis. Obes Surg. 2009;19(5):553–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schlosshauer T, Kiehlmann M, Jung D, et al. Post-bariatric abdominoplasty: analysis of 406 cases with focus on risk factors and complications. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(1):59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Duff CG, Aslam S, Griffiths RW. Fleur-de-Lys abdominoplasty--a consecutive case series. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(6):557–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van Uchelen JH, Werker PM, Kon M. Complications of abdominoplasty in 86 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1869–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Austin RE, Lista F, Khan A, et al. The impact of protein nutritional supplementation for massive weight loss patients undergoing abdominoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(2):204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Agha-Mohammadi S, Hurwitz DJ. Potential impacts of nutritional deficiency of postbariatric patients on body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1901–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastiaan Van Cauwenberge.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent does not apply.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Paep, K., Van Campenhout, I., Van Cauwenberge, S. et al. Post-bariatric Abdominoplasty: Identification of Risk Factors for Complications. OBES SURG 31, 3203–3209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05383-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05383-0

Keywords

Navigation