Abstract
Background
Abdominoplasties performed with Scarpa Fascia preservation, improve recovery and reduce complications, particularly seroma. Bariatric patients who experience massive weight loss frequently seek body contouring procedures and represent a high-risk group. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia preservation versus the classical technique in a bariatric population.
Methods
A retrospective observational cohort study was performed between March 2015 and March 2021 in 65 postbariatric patients who underwent a classic full abdominoplasty (group A, N = 25) or a similar procedure except for the preservation of Scarpa fascia (group B, N = 40). Total and daily drain output, time until drain removal, long drainers (≥ 6 days), length of hospital stay, emergency department visit, readmission to the hospital, reoperation, local and systemic complications were the outcomes evaluated.
Results
Group B had a 3-day reduction in time until drain removal (p < 0.001), a 62.6% reduction of total drain output (p < 0.001) and a 3-day reduction in the length of the hospital stay (p < 0.001). Long drainers (≥ 6 days) were highly reduced (from 56.0% in group A to 7.5% in group B) (p < 0.001). There was a lower incidence of liquid collections in group B, with a 66.7% reduction in seroma incidence.
Conclusions
Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia preservation improves recovery by reducing drain output, allowing earlier drain removal and reducing long periods with suction drains. It also reduces hospital stay and seroma incidence. This technique modifies the high-risk postbariatric patient in such a major way that he behaves like a nonbariatric.
Level of Evidence II
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collaborators GBDO, Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH et al (2017) Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med 377:13–27
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al (2017) Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO worldwide survey 2014. Obes Surg 27:2279–2289
Dumon KR, Murayama KM (2011) Bariatric surgery outcomes. Surg Clin North Am 91:1313–1338
Kushner RF, Noble CA (2006) Long-term outcome of bariatric surgery: an interim analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 81:S46–S51
Song AY, Jean RD, Hurwitz DJ et al (2005) A classification of contour deformities after bariatric weight loss: the Pittsburgh Rating Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1535–1544
Bossert RP, Rubin JP (2012) Evaluation of the weight loss patient presenting for plastic surgery consultation. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1361–1369
Light D, Arvanitis GM, Abramson D, Glasberg SB (2010) Effect of weight loss after bariatric surgery on skin and the extracellular matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:343–351
Papadopulos NA, Staffler V, Mirceva V et al (2012) Does abdominoplasty have a positive influence on quality of life, self-esteem, and emotional stability? Plast Reconstr Surg 129:957e-e962
American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2020) Plastic Surgery Statistics Full Report. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2020.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2022
Matarasso A, Swift RW, Rankin M (2006) Abdominoplasty and abdominal contour surgery: a national plastic surgery survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1797–1808
Winocour J, Gupta V, Ramirez JR et al (2015) Abdominoplasty: risk factors, complication rates, and safety of combined procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:597e–606e
Rogliani M, Silvi E, Labardi L, Maggiulli F, Cervelli V (2006) Obese and nonobese patients: complications of abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 57:336–338
Marouf A, Mortada H (2021) Complications of body contouring surgery in postbariatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45:2810–2820
Hasanbegovic E, Sorensen JA (2014) Complications following body contouring surgery after massive weight loss: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:295–301
Coon D, Gusenoff JA, Kannan N et al (2009) Body mass and surgical complications in the postbariatric reconstructive patient: analysis of 511 cases. Ann Surg 249:397–401
Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Vasconez LO, Amarante J (2010) Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1232–1239
Costa-Ferreira A, Marco R, Vasconez L, Amarante J (2016) Abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation. Ann Plast Surg 76(Suppl 4):S264–S274
Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Silva A, Vasconez LO, Amarante J (2013) Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: randomized clinical study of efficacy and safety. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:644–651
Novais CS, Carvalho J, Valenca-Filipe R et al (2020) Abdominoplasty with scarpa fascia preservation: randomized controlled trial with assessment of scar quality and cutaneous sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 146:156e-e164
Bozola AR (2010) Abdominoplasty: same classification and a new treatment concept 20 years later. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:181–192
Matarasso A (1991) Abdominoplasty—a system of classification and treatment for combined abdominoplasty and suction—assisted lipectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 15:111–121
Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Vásconez L, Amarante J (2016) Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty. In: Di Giuseppe A, Shiffman MA (eds) Aesthetic plastic surgery of the abdomen. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 59–73
Torres-Silva C, Pisco A, Valenca-Filipe R et al (2021) Dissection technique for abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation: comparative study on avulsion technique versus diathermocoagulation. Aesthet Surg J 41:NP804–NP819
Pitanguy I (1975) Abdominal lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg 2:401–410
Baroudi R, Keppke EM, Netto FT (1974) Abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 54:161–168
Sjoberg DD, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery JA, Larmarange J (2021) Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary package. R J 13(1):570–580. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2021-053
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York
Nahai FR (2010) Anatomic considerations in abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 37:407–414
Costa-Ferreira A, Rodrigues-Pereira P, Rebelo M, Vasconez LO, Amarante J (2014) Morphometric study (macroscopic and microscopic) of the lower abdominal wall. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:1313–1322
Markman B, Barton FE Jr (1987) Anatomy of the subcutaneous tissue of the trunk and lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:248–254
Felmerer G, Muehlberger T, Berens von Rautenfeld D, Vogt PM (2002) The lymphatic system of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: an anatomical study. Br J Plast Surg 55:335–339
Friedman T, Coon D, Kanbour-Shakir A, Jt M, Rubin JP (2015) Defining the lymphatic system of the anterior abdominal wall: an anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1027–1032
Le Louarn C (1996) Partial subfascial abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:123–127
Harley OJ, Pickford MA (2013) CT analysis of fat distribution superficial and deep to the Scarpa’s fascial layer in the mid and lower abdomen. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:525–530
Pirri C, Petrelli L, Fede C et al (2023) Blood supply to the superficial fascia of the abdomen: an anatomical study. Clin Anat 36:570–580
Valenca-Filipe R, Vardasca R, Magalhaes C et al (2023) Classic versus Scarpa-sparing abdominoplasty: an infrared thermographic comparative analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 82:264–274
Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Minabe T, Kishi K, Aiso S (2004) Anatomical study of subcutaneous adipofascial tissue: a concept of the protective adipofascial system (PAFS) and lubricant adipofascial system (LAFS). Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 38:261–266
Lancerotto L, Stecco C, Macchi V et al (2011) Layers of the abdominal wall: anatomical investigation of subcutaneous tissue and superficial fascia. Surg Radiol Anat 33:835–842
Pisco A, Rebelo M, Peres H, Costa-Ferreira A (2020) Abdominoplasty with scarpa fascia preservation: prospective comparative study of suction drain number. Ann Plast Surg 84:356–360
Fang RC, Lin SJ, Mustoe TA (2010) Abdominoplasty flap elevation in a more superficial plane: decreasing the need for drains. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:677–682
Correia-Goncalves I, Valenca-Filipe R, Carvalho J et al (2017) Abdominoplasty with Scarpa fascia preservation—comparative study in a bariatric population. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:423–428
International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (2021). Sixth IFSO global registry report. www.ifso.com/pdf/ifso-6th-registry-report-2021.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2022
Marsh DJ, Fox A, Grobbelaar AO, Chana JS (2015) Abdominoplasty and seroma: a prospective randomised study comparing scalpel and handheld electrocautery dissection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:192–196
Valenca-Filipe R, Martins A, Silva A et al (2015) Dissection technique for abdominoplasty: a prospective study on scalpel versus diathermocoagulation (coagulation mode). Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e299
Rousseau P, Vincent H, Potier B, Arnaud D, Darsonval V (2011) Diathermocoagulation in cutting mode and large flap dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2093–2098
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in this article.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Monteiro, I.A., de Sousa Barros, A. & Costa-Ferreira, A. Postbariatric Abdominoplasty: A Comparative Study on Scarpa Fascia Preservation Versus Classical Technique. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 2511–2524 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03455-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03455-3