Abstract
Thermoelectric technology is an unconventional approach for renewable energy generation with the aim of reducing waste via improved overall efficiency. There is a primary need to develop such environmentally friendly systems that can harness readily available renewable energy resources and utilize them for power generation at reduced cost. Such systems enable conversion of waste heat. In this work, the effects of four parameters, i.e., the quantity and quality of heat, the composition of the waste stream in liquid phase, and losses during conversion, on the conversion efficiency are studied, and a method proposed to measure them instead of using the rating provided by the manufacturer. The results show that the heat exchanger configuration has an important impact on the power generation established through parallel and counterflow arrangements. The temperature difference (heat quality) achieved between the hot and cold fluid is lower in case of a counterflow heat exchanger if the other parameters remain the same. The counterflow configuration is more effective than the parallel flow configuration, but suffers from greater convective losses. Higher thermal energy consumption is noted in case of parallel flow due to the uneven temperature difference along the flow passage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. Orr, A. Akbarzadeh, M. Mochizuki, and R. Singh, Appl. Therm. Eng. 101, 490 (2016).
M.F.C. Pa, Development of alternative power supply to charge small gadgets. (Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 2015), http://eprints.utem.edu.my/17241/1/Development%20Of%20Alternative%20Power%20Supply%20To%20Charge%20Small%20Gadgets%2024%20Pages.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2018.
X. Gou, H. Xiao, and S. Yang, Appl. Energy 87, 3131 (2010).
A. Patyk, Appl. Energy 102, 1448 (2013).
X. Liang, X. Sun, H. Tian, G. Shu, Y. Wang, and X. Wang, Appl. Energy 130, 190 (2014).
W. Liu, Q. Jie, H.S. Kim, and Z. Ren, Acta Mater. 87, 357 (2015).
K. Mboyi, J. Ren, and Y. Liu, Chin. J. Aeronaut. 28, 427 (2015).
A.Y. Faraji, R. Singh, M. Mochizuki, and A. Akbarzadeh, J. Electron. Mater. 43, 1940 (2014).
M.S. Bohn, J. Heat Transf. 103, 693 (1981).
T. Haruyama, Cryogenics 41, 325 (2001).
W. Li, M.C. Paul, J. Siviter, A. Montecucco, A.R. Knox, T. Sweet, and D.H. Gregory, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 8, 164 (2016).
M.A. Muñoz-García, G.P. Moreda, M.P. Raga-Arroyo, and O. Marín-González, Comput. Electron. Agric. 93, 63 (2013).
A.S. Cubukcu, D.F.R. Romero, and G.A. Urban, Sens. Actuators A 208, 73 (2014).
A. Dewan, S.U. Ay, M.N. Karim, and H. Beyenal, J. Power Sources 245, 129 (2014).
S. Tundee, N. Srihajong, and S. Charmongkolpradit, Energy Proc. 48, 453 (2014).
M.F. Remeli, A. Date, B. Orr, L.C. Ding, B. Singh, N.D.N. Affandi, and A. Akbarzadeh, Energy Convers. Manag. 111, 147 (2016).
Y. Wang, S. Su, T. Liu, G. Su, and J. Chen, Energy 90, 1575 (2015).
R. Ahiska and H. Mamur, IET Renew. Power Gener. 7, 700 (2013).
Y.J. Dai, R.Z. Wang, and L. Ni, Renew. Energy 28, 949 (2003).
X. Xu, S. Zhou, M.M. Meyers, B.G. Sammakia, and B.T. Murray, J. Electron. Packag. 136, 041006 (2014).
S.M. O’Shaughnessy, M.J. Deasy, J.V. Doyle, and A.J. Robinson, Energy Sustain. Dev. 28, 41 (2015).
M.H. Elsheikh, D.A. Shnawah, M.F.M. Sabri, S.B.M. Said, M.H. Hassan, M.B.A. Bashir, and M. Mohamad, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30, 337 (2014).
E. Hourdakis and A.G. Nassiopoulou, Sensors 13, 13596 (2013).
A.I. Boukai, Y. Bunimovich, J. Tahir-Kheli, J.K. Yu, W.A. Goddard Iii, and J.R. Heath, Materials For Sustainable Energy: A Collection of Peer-Reviewed Research and Review Articles from Nature Publishing Group, ed. V. Dusastre (Singapore: World Scientific, 2011), pp. 116–119.
S. LeBlanc, Sustain. Mater. Technol. 1, 26 (2014).
A.A. Sherchenkov, Y.I. Shtern, R.E. Mironov, M.Y. Shtern, and M.S. Rogachev, Nanotechnol. Russ. 10, 827 (2015).
L. Hu, H. Wu, T. Zhu, C. Fu, J. He, P. Ying, and X. Zhao, Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500411 (2015).
M.F. Remeli, K. Verojporn, B. Singh, L. Kiatbodin, A. Date, and A. Akbarzadeh, Energy Proc. 75, 608 (2015).
D.M. Rowe and G. Min, IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol. 143, 351 (1996).
K. Takahashi, T. Kanno, A. Sakai, H. Tamaki, H. Kusada, and Y. Yamada, Sci. Rep. 3, 1501 (2013).
K.T. Mueller, O. Waters, V. Bubnovich, N. Orlovskaya, and R.H. Chen, Energy 56, 108 (2013).
A. Montecucco and A.R. Knox, Appl. Energy 118, 166 (2014).
Y.Y. Hsiao, W.C. Chang, and S.L. Chen, Energy 35, 1447 (2010).
T. Kyono, R.O. Suzuki, and K. Ono, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 22, 58 (2003).
J. Yu and H. Zhao, J. Power Sources 172, 428 (2007).
K. Ono and R.O. Suzuki, JOM 50, 49 (1998).
BCS, Waste heat recovery: technology and opportunities in U.S. industries (Energy.gov, 2008), https://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/intensiveprocesses/pdfs/waste_heat_recovery.pdf Accessed 20 June 2018.
A. Montecucco, J. Siviter, and A. R. Knox, in Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition IEEE (2012), pp. 2777–2783.
L.E. Bell, Science 321, 1457 (2008).
D.B. Gingerich and M.S. Mauter, Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 8297 (2015).
J.P. Heremans, V. Jovovic, E.S. Toberer, A. Saramat, K. Kurosaki, A. Charoenphakdee, and G.J. Snyder, Science 321, 554 (2008).
E. Hourdakis and A.G. Nassiopoulou, Sensors 10, 13596 (2013).
R.Y. Nuwayhid, A. Shihadeh, and N. Ghaddar, Energy Convers. Manag. 46, 1631 (2005).
M. Boonyasri, J. Jamradloedluk, C. Lertsatitthanakorn, A. Therdyothin, and S. Soponronnarit, J. Electron. Mater. 46, 3043 (2017).
J. Chen, K. Li, C. Liu, M. Li, Y. Lv, L. Jia, and S. Jiang, Energy 10, 1329 (2017).
X. Niu, J. Yu, and S. Wang, J. Power Sources 188, 621 (2009).
K.M. Saqr, M.K. Mansour, and M.N. Musa, Int. J. Automot. Technol. 9, 155 (2008).
R.O. Suzuki, Y. Sasaki, T. Fujisaka, and M. Chen, J. Electron. Mater. 41, 1766 (2012).
T. Ali, R.A. Bakar, B.A. Sup, M.F. Zainudin, and G.L. Ming, Energy Proc. 68, 3 (2015).
W. Sun, Z. Zhao, and Y. Wang, Energies 10, 219 (2017).
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely acknowledge BIT Sindri and IIT (ISM) Dhanbad for the development of the experimental setup. We also acknowledge Prof. S.C. Roy and N.P. Choudhry of the Mechanical Engineering Department, BIT Sindri, India for providing valuable suggestions and help. This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, S., Mandal, S.K., Singh, P.K. et al. Performance Analysis of a Thermoelectric Generation System with Different Flow Configurations. J. Electron. Mater. 48, 4607–4617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07249-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07249-9