Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 1184–1191 | Cite as

Disparities in Quality of Primary Care by Resident and Staff Physicians: Is There a Conflict Between Training and Equity?

  • Utibe R. EssienEmail author
  • Wei He
  • Alaka Ray
  • Yuchiao Chang
  • Jonathan R. Abraham
  • Daniel E. Singer
  • Steven J. Atlas
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Outpatient primary care experience is vital to internal medicine resident training but may impact quality and equity of care delivered in practices that include resident physicians. Understanding whether quality differences exist among resident and staff primary care physicians (PCPs) may present an opportunity to address health disparities within academic medical centers.

Objective

To determine whether there are differences in the quality of primary care provided by resident PCPs compared to staff PCPs.

Design

A retrospective cohort study with a propensity-matched analysis.

Participants

143,274 patients, including 10,870 patients managed by resident PCPs, seen in 16 primary care practices affiliated with an academic medical center.

Main Measures

Guideline-concordant chronic disease management of diabetes (HbA1c, LDL) and coronary artery disease (LDL), preventive breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening, and resource utilization measures including emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, high-cost imaging, and patient-reported health experience.

Key Results

At baseline, there were significant differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics between resident and staff physician patients. Resident patients were less likely to achieve chronic disease and preventive cancer screening outcome measures including LDL at goal (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.77 [95% CI 0.65, 0.92]) for patients with coronary artery disease; HbA1c at goal (aOR 0.73 [95% CI 0.62, 0.85]) for patients with diabetes; breast (aOR 0.56 [95% CI 0.49, 0.63]), cervical (aOR 0.66 [95% CI 0.60, 0.74]), and colorectal (aOR 0.72 [95% CI 0.65, 0.79] cancer screening. Additionally, resident patients had higher rates of ED visits and hospitalizations but lower rates of high-cost imaging. Resident patients reported lower rates of satisfaction with certain access to care and communication measures. Similar outcomes were noted in propensity-matched sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

After controlling for differences in sociodemographic and clinical factors, resident patients were less likely to achieve chronic disease and preventive cancer screening outcomes compared to staff patients. Further efforts to address ambulatory trainee education and primary care quality along with novel approaches to the management of the disproportionately disadvantaged resident patient panels are needed.

KEY WORDS

resident primary care quality racial and ethnic disparities medical education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ethan Lennox, MA, for his assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funders

Utibe R. Essien’s role in the research reported in this publication was supported by the National Research Service award grant T32 HP10251.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Institutional Review Board at Partners Healthcare approved this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2019_4960_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 23.4 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Physicians. Internal medicine residency programs continue to grow but policies needed to ensure patient access to general internists. https://www.acponline.org/acp-newsroom/internal-medicine-residency-programs-continue-to-grow-but-policies-needed-to-ensure-patient-access. Published 2018. Accessed January 27, 2019.
  2. 2.
    National Resident Matching Program. Thousands of Resident Physician Applicants Celebrate NRMP Match Results. http://www.nrmp.org/press-release-thousands-resident-physician-applicants-celebrate-nrmp-match-results/. Published 2018. Accessed January 27, 2019.
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ambulatory Care Use and Physician office visits. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/physician-visits.htm. Published 2017. Accessed January 27, 2019.
  4. 4.
    Nadkarni M, Reddy S, Bates CK, Fosburgh B, Babbott S, Holmboe E. Ambulatory-based education in internal medicine: Current organization and implications for transformation. Results of a national survey of resident continuity clinic directors. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(1):16–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1437-3 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levine DM, Linder JA, Landon BE. The quality of outpatient care delivered to adults in the United States, 2002 to 2013. JAMA Intern Med. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6217
  6. 6.
    McGlynn Elizabeth A.; Asch Steven M.; Adams John; Keesey Joan; Hicks J;, Kerr EA. The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–2645.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charlson ME, Karnik J, Wong M, McCulloch CE, Hollenberg JP. Does experience matter? A comparison of the practice of attendings and residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):497–503.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0085.x Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zallman L, Ma J, Xiao L, Lasser KE. Quality of US primary care delivered by resident and staff physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1193–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1456-0 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angstman KB, Garrison GM, Rohrer JE, Dupras DM, O’Grady JS. Retail clinic visits: Are resident paneled patients more likely to make multiple visits? Fam Med. 2012;44(4):235–239.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yancy WS, Macpherson DS, Hanusa BH, et al. Patient satisfaction in resident and attending ambulatory care clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(11):755–762.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.91005.x Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nguyen DL, Dejesus RS, Wieland ML. Missed appointments in resident continuity clinic: patient characteristics and health care outcomes. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(3):350–355.  https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-10-00199.1 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colbert JA. Experiments in Continuity — Rethinking Residency Training in Ambulatory Care. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(6):504–505.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1301604 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brooks JV, Singer SJ, Rosenthal M, Chien AT, Peters AS. Feeling inadequate: Residents’ stress and learning at primary care clinics in the United States. Med Teach. 2017:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1413236
  14. 14.
    Stewart EA, Marzio DH-D, Guggenheim DE, Gotto J, Veloski JJ, Kane GC. Resident scores on a patient satisfaction survey: evidence for maintenance of communication skills throughout residency. J Grad Med Educ. 2011.  https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00047.1
  15. 15.
    Francis MD, Warm E, Julian KA, et al. Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Internal Medicine Resident Continuity Clinics: Findings of the Educational Innovations Project Ambulatory Collaborative. J Grad Med Educ. 2014.  https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00159.1
  16. 16.
    Fan VS, Burman M, McDonell MB, Fihn SD. Continuity of care and other determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40135.x
  17. 17.
    Egbert LD, Rothman IL. Relation between the race and economic status of patients and who performs their surgery. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(2):90–91.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197707142970205 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fiscella K, Sanders MR. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Quality of Health Care. Annu Rev Public Heal. 2016;37:375–394.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021439 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sessums LL, Conway PH. Saving Primary Care. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1560–1562.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Regenstein M, Nocella K, Jewers MM, Mullan F. The Cost of Residency Training in Teaching Health Centers. N Engl J Med. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1607866
  21. 21.
    Ayanian JZ, Hamel MB. Transforming Primary Care — We Get What We Pay For. N Engl J Med. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1603778
  22. 22.
    Ray A, Jones D, Palamara K, Overland M, Steinberg KP. Improving Ambulatory Training in Internal Medicine: X + Y (or Why Not?). J Gen Intern Med. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3808-x
  23. 23.
    Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Lasko TA, Chueh HC, Grant RW, Barry MJ. Is this “my” patient? Development and validation of a predictive model to link patients to primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(9):973–978.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743147 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Atlas SJ, Grant RW, Ferris TG, Chang Y, Barry MJ. Patient-physician connectedness and quality of primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(5):325–335. doi:150/5/325 [pii]Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murphy SN, Chueh HC. A security architecture for query tools used to access large biomedical databases. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:552–556. doi: D020002391 [pii]Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berkowitz SA, Traore CY, Singer DE, Atlas SJ. Evaluating area-based socioeconomic status indicators for monitoring disparities within health care systems: results from a primary care network. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(2):398–417.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12229 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3558716. Accessed January 27, 2019.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Higashi T, Wenger NS, Adams JL, et al. Relationship between Number of Medical Conditions and Quality of Care. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(24):2496–2504.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa066253 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS Measures and Technical Resources. https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/. Published 2018. Accessed November 16, 2018.
  30. 30.
    Grant RW, Cagliero E, Sullivan CM, et al. A controlled trial of population management: Diabetes mellitus: Putting Evidence into Practice (DM-PEP). Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2299–2305.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.10.2299 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    DeFaria Yeh D, Freeman MW, Meigs JB, Grant RW. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in patients with elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(1):1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.053 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hivert M-F, Grant RW, Shrader P, Meigs JB. Identifying primary care patients at risk for future diabetes and cardiovascular disease using electronic health records. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):170.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-170 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stone NJ, Jennifer Robinson C, Chair Alice Lichtenstein VH, et al. Stone NJ, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Blood Cholesterol Guideline 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults EXPERT PANEL MEMBERS ACC/AHA TASK FORCE MEMBERS Subcommittee on Prevention Guidelines. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/circulationaha/early/2013/11/11/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.full.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2019.
  34. 34.
    Recommendations for Primary Care Practice - US Preventive Services Task Force. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/recommendations. Accessed January 27, 2019.
  35. 35.
    Ashburner JM, Horn DM, O’Keefe SM, et al. Chronic disease outcomes from primary care population health program implementation. Am J Manag Care. 2017;23(12):728–735.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hurley RE, Freund DA, Taylor DE. Emergency room use and primary care case management: Evidence from four medicaid demonstration programs. Am J Public Health. 1989. : https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.7.843
  37. 37.
    Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet. 1994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90634-3
  38. 38.
    Stuart EA. Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward. Stat Sci. 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313
  39. 39.
    Bazemore A, Stange KC, Ferrer RL. The paradox of primary care. In: Family Medicine: The Classic Papers. ; 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315365305
  40. 40.
    Barkley S, Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. The contribution of primary care to health systems and health. In: Family Medicine: The Classic Papers. ; 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315365305
  41. 41.
    PPC-Patient-Centered Medical. National Committee for Quality Assurance Website. http://www.ncqa.org/. Accessed January 27, 2019.
  42. 42.
    Keirns CC, Bosk CL. Perspective: The unintended consequences of training residents in dysfunctional outpatient settings. Acad Med. 2008;83(5):498–502.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816be3ab Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khalid L, Liebschutz JM, Xuan Z, et al. Adherence to Prescription Opioid Monitoring Guidelines among Residents and Attending Physicians in the Primary Care Setting. Pain Med. 2015;16(3):480–487.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12602 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Doctoroff L, McNally D, Vanka A, Nall R, Mukamal KJ. Inpatient-outpatient transitions for patients with resident primary care physicians: Access and readmission. Am J Med. 2014;127(9):886.e15–886.e20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.03.038 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jena AB, Sun EC, Romley JA. Mortality Among High-Risk Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Admitted to US Teaching-Intensive Hospitals in July: A Retrospective Observational Study. Circulation. 2013;128(25):2754–2763.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004074 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Inaba K, Recinos G, Teixeira PGR, et al. Complications and Death at the Start of the New Academic Year: Is There a July Phenomenon? J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2010;68(1):19–22.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b88dfe Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Englesbe MJ, Fan Z, Baser O, Birkmeyer JD. Mortality in Medicare Patients Undergoing Surgery in July in Teaching Hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):871–876.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a501bd Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Changoor NR, Ortega G, Ekladios M, Zogg CK, Cornwell EE, Haider AH. Racial disparities in surgical outcomes: Does the level of resident surgeon play a role? Surgery. 2015;158(2):547–555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.046 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ferraris VA, Harris JW, Martin JT, Saha SP, Endean ED. Impact of Residents on Surgical Outcomes in High-Complexity Procedures. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Vol 222. ; 2016:545–555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.056
  50. 50.
    Pincavage AT, Ratner S, Prochaska ML, et al. Outcomes for Resident-Identified High-Risk Patients and Resident Perspectives of Year-End Continuity Clinic Handoffs. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(11):1438–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2100-y Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Caines LC, Brockmeyer DM, Tess A V., Kim H, Kriegel G, Bates CK. The Revolving Door of Resident Continuity Practice: Identifying Gaps in Transitions of Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(9):995–998.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1731-8 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Young JQ, Wachter RM. Academic Year-End Transfers of Outpatients From Outgoing to Incoming Residents. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1327.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1399 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pincavage AT, Lee WW, Beiting KJ, Arora VM. What do patients think about year-end resident continuity clinic handoffs? A qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):999–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2395-3 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pincavage AT, Ratner S, Prochaska ML, et al. Outcomes for Resident-Identified High-Risk Patients and Resident Perspectives of Year-End Continuity Clinic Handoffs. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(11):1438–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2100-y Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Solomon SR, Gooding HC, Reyes Nieva H, Linder JA. Acute Care Utilization by Patients After Graduation of Their Resident Primary Care Physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(11):1611–1617.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3305-7 Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wieland M, Jaeger T, Bundrick J. Resident physician perspectives on outpatient continuity of care. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;4(December):668–673.  https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-05-04-40 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fernald DH, Deaner N, O’Neill C, Jortberg BT, degruy FV, Dickinson WP. Overcoming early barriers to PCMH practice improvement in family medicine residencies. Fam Med. 43(7):503–509. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21761382. Accessed January 27, 2019.
  58. 58.
    Hibbard JH, Greene J. What The Evidence Shows About Patient Activation: Better Health Outcomes And Care Experiences; Fewer Data On Costs. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):207–214.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bauer UE, Briss PA, Goodman RA, Bowman BA. Prevention of chronic disease in the 21st century: elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA. Lancet. 2014;384(9937):45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60648-6 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Farnan JM, Petty LA, Georgitis E, et al. A systematic review: The effect of clinical supervision on patient and residency education outcomes. Acad Med. 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824822cc
  61. 61.
    Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient-physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med. 1999.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.9.997

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Utibe R. Essien
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Wei He
    • 3
  • Alaka Ray
    • 4
    • 5
  • Yuchiao Chang
    • 3
    • 5
  • Jonathan R. Abraham
    • 3
  • Daniel E. Singer
    • 3
    • 5
  • Steven J. Atlas
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Center for Health Equity Research and PromotionVA Pittsburgh Healthcare SystemPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Division of General Internal MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  5. 5.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations