Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association of the Range of Outpatient Services Provided by Primary Care Physicians with Subsequent Health Care Costs and Utilization

  • Research and Reporting Methods
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Broader primary care practice range of services (ROS), defined as the diversity of professional services delivered, is associated with lower utilization. ROS provided by individual primary care physicians (PCPs) varies considerably with unclear implications for patients.

Objectives

Create a PCP-ROS measure covering six categories of outpatient services, including expanded codes for mental health counseling services and point of care ultrasound (POCUS) technology in physician offices. Determine whether PCP-ROS is associated with total Medicare expenditures, inpatient admissions, acute hospital utilization (AHU), and emergency department (ED) visits. Examine physician and practice characteristics associated with PCP-ROS.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants

4,569,711 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries and 27,008 PCPs observed during the evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC +) initiative.

Measurements

PCP-ROS, hospitalizations, AHU (includes observation stays as well as inpatient admissions), ED visits, and total Medicare expenditures.

Results

Physicians varied substantially in the range of services provided. Broader PCP-ROS was significantly, independently associated with 1 – 3% lower Medicare expenditures (p ≤ 0.01), inpatient admissions (p ≤ 0.027), AHU (p ≤ 0.025), and ED visit rates (p ≤ 0.000). PCP-ROS score was associated with improved patient outcomes, independent of physician provision of procedures (such as laceration repair or skin excisions). Physicians in practice sites affiliated with a hospital or health system had narrower PCP-ROS than independent physicians by 0.3 to 0.4 (p < 0.001). Internal medicine specialty was associated with narrower PCP-ROS than family medicine by 0.3 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients cared for by primary care physicians who provide a broader range of services subsequently experience lower acute care utilization and expenditures than do those cared for by physicians with narrower ROS. Practice leaders and professional associations should consider how best to ensure that primary care physicians efficiently and effectively provide the office-based professional services most needed by their patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences; 1996. [cited 2022 Nov 22]. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5152/primary-care-americas-health-in-a-new-era. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

  2. International Conference on Primary Health Care (1978: Alma Ata, USSR), World Health Organization & United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Primary Health Care: A Joint Report by the Director-General of the World Health Organization and the Executive Director of the United Nations Children’s Fund. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1978.

  3. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. USA: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Malley AS, Rich EC. Measuring comprehensiveness of primary care: challenges and opportunities. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3): S568-575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O'Malley AS, Rich EC, Shang L, et al. new approaches to measuring the comprehensiveness of primary care physicians. Health Serv Res. 2019;54(2):356-366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rich EC, O'Malley AS, Burkhart C, et al. Primary Care Practices Providing a Broader Range of Services Have Lower Medicare Expenditures and Emergency Department Utilization. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(9):2796-2802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. O'Malley AS, Rich EC, Shang L, et al. Practice-site-level measures of primary care comprehensiveness and their associations with patient outcomes. Health Serv Res. 2021;56(3):371-377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, The Medicare Learning Network. Behavioral Health Integration Services. [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2022. [cited 2022 Nov 22]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/BehavioralHealthIntegrationPrint-Friendly.pdf

  9. American Academy of Family Physicians, Recommended Curriculum Guidelines for Family Medicine Residents Point-of-Care Ultrasound. [Internet]. Martinez (CA): AAFP; updated 2021 Sept. [cited 2022 Nov 22]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/students-residents/residency-program-directors/curriculum-guidelines.html

  10. Kanji HD, McCallum J, Sirounis D, et al. Limited echocardiography-guided therapy in subacute shock is associated with change in management and improved outcomes. J Crit Care. 2014;29(5):700-705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al Deeb M, Barbic S, Featherstone R, et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema in patients presenting with acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(8):843-852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melniker LA, Leibner E, McKenney MG, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of point-of-care, limited ultrasonography for trauma in the emergency department: the first sonography outcomes assessment program trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(3):227-235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorensen, B., Hunskaar, S. Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations. Ultrasound J 11, 31 (2019). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0145-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall JW, Holman H, Barreto TW, et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Family Medicine Residencies 5-Year Update: A CERA Study. Fam Med. 2020;52(7):505-511. doi: https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2020.223648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. American College of Physicians. In-person courses for physicians [Internet]. ACP online. American College of Physicians; 2022 [cited 2022Nov22]. Available from: https://www.acponline.org/meetings-courses/focused-topics/point-of-care-ultrasound-pocus-for-internal-medicine/in-person-courses-for-physicians. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

  16. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Comprehensive primary care plus: CMS innovation center [Internet]. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2016 [cited 2022Nov22]. Available from: https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/comprehensive-primary-care-plus. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

  17. Swankoski K, O’Malley A, Tu H, et al. Independent Evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Fourth Annual Report [Internet]. Mathematica; 2022 [cited 2022Nov22]. Available from https://innovation.cms.gov/data-and-reports/2022/cpc-plus-fourth-annual-eval-report. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

  18. Petersen D, O’Malley AS, Ghosh A, et al. Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Initiative: Second Annual Report. Supplemental Volume. Princeton (NJ): Mathematica; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rich, EC. Benefits of the range of services provided by primary care physicians. Abstract presented at: Academy Health Annual Research Meeting; 2022 Jun 4–7; Washington, DC.

  20. National Quality Forum. Draft Scientific Methods Panel-Recommended Acceptable Reliability Thresholds [Internet]. National Quality Forum; 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 27]. Available from https://www.qualityforum.org/Measuring_Performance/Scientific_Methods_Panel/Meetings/2021_Scientific_Methods_Panel_Meetings.aspx. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

  21. Fraze TK, Briggs ADM, Whitcomb EK, et al. Role of Nurse Practitioners in Caring for Patients with Complex Health Needs. Med Care. 2020;58(10):853-860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Issues in Medicare Beneficiaries’ Access to Primary Care. Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System; Washington (DC): Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2019.

  23. Contreary K, Chatrath S, Jones DJ, Cohen G, Miller D, Rich E. Consolidation and Mergers Among Health Systems in 2021: New Data from the AHRQ Compendium. Health Aff Forefront. June 20, 2023.

  24. Primary Care First (PCF) Model Options [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [cited 2021 June 2]. Available from: https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/primary-care-first-model-options. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

  25. Global and Professional Direct Contracting (GPDC) Model [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [cited 2021 June 2]. Available from https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/gpdc-model. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

  26. Committee on Implementing High-Quality Primary Care, Board on Health Care Services, Health and Medicine Division. Implementing high-quality primary care: rebuilding the foundation of health care. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2021. Available from: https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/implementing-high-quality-primary-care#sectionPublications. Accessed 10 Aug 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank Dmitriy Poznyak, PhD, at Mathematica for his assistance with reliability testing of our Practice-ROS measure, as well as Nancy McCall, ScD, at Mathematica for their thoughtful advice throughout this research and careful review of this manuscript.

Funding

Supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, under contracts HHSM-500–2014-00034I/HHSM-500-T0010 and HHSM-500–2014-00034I/75FCMC19F0005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene C. Rich MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest aside from support on contracts from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) during the conduct of the study.

IRB Approval:

The New England Institutional Review Board (IRB) granted the initiative an IRB exemption on the basis of the federal common rule (Section 45 CFR 46.101[b][5]), because the purpose of the study was to evaluate a public benefit program.

Disclaimer:

The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or any of its agencies.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 93 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 42 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rich, E., Peris, K., Luhr, M. et al. Association of the Range of Outpatient Services Provided by Primary Care Physicians with Subsequent Health Care Costs and Utilization. J GEN INTERN MED 38, 3414–3423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08363-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08363-5

KEY WORDS

Navigation