Abstract
Purpose
This study evaluated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in infected diabetic foot ulcers.
Materials and methods
Sixteen diabetic patients underwent foot MRI between January 2006 and September 2007 for suspected unilateral osteomyelitis. Three of 16 patients showed radiographic changes due to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. Twelve of 16 patients also underwent MR angiography of the lower limbs for the purpose of planning surgical or endovascular treatment. The musculoskeletal and vascular MRI studies were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists.
Results
The final diagnosis, based on clinical, imaging, microbiological and histological findings, was osteomyelitis in 13/16 cases. Foot MRI allowed a correct diagnosis in 15/16 patients, with 1 false positive result demonstrated by computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsy. MR angiography of the lower limbs was considered nondiagnostic in 5/12 patients in the infrapopliteal region owing to venous contamination.
Conclusions
MRI has high sensitivity for the detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot but lower specificity related to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. If diagnostic uncertainty persists, a bone biopsy is indicated. The inflammatory hyperaemia caused by the ulcer deteriorates the diagnostic quality of 40%–50% of MR angiography studies in the infrapopliteal region. In these cases, selective arteriography is appropriate, as it can be performed in the same session as angioplasty.
Riassunto
Obiettivo
Valutare l’approccio con Risonanza Magnetica (RM) al piede diabetico con ulcera infetta.
Materiali e metodi
Sedici pazienti diabetici sono stati sottoposti da gennaio 2006 a settembre 2007 a RM del piede per sospetta osteomielite monolaterale; in 3/16 vi erano alterazioni radiografiche da osteo-artropatia neuropatica di Charcot. Dodici/16 pazienti hanno eseguito anche l’angio-RM degli arti inferiori per pianificare il trattamento chirurgico o endovascolare. Gli esami RM muscolo-scheletrici e vascolari sono stati valutati retrospettivamente da tre radiologi.
Risultati
La diagnosi finale, basata sui rilievi clinici, imaging, microbiologici e istologici è stata di osteomielite in 13/16 casi. La RM del piede ha consentito la diagnosi corretta in 15/16 pazienti, con 1 falso positivo, dimostrato dalla biopsia ossea TC-guidata. L’angio-RM degli arti inferiori è stata considerata non diagnostica nel distretto infra-popliteo in 5/12 pazienti a causa di artefatti da contaminazione venosa.
Conclusioni
La RM ha elevata sensibilità per l’osteomielite nel piede diabetico, ma più bassa specificità dovuta soprattutto all’osteo-artropatia neuropatica di Charcot; se permane dubbio diagnostico è indicata la biopsia ossea. L’iperemia flogistica causata dall’ulcera deteriora il 40%–50% degli studi angio-RM a livello sottopopliteo: in tali casi è appropriata l’arteriografia selettiva per la possibilità di effettuare angioplastica nella stessa seduta.
Similar content being viewed by others
References/Bibliografia
Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D et al (1999) Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:382–387
Lipsky BA (1997) Osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients. Clin Infect Dis 25:1318–1326
Grayson ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K et al (1995) Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers: a clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. JAMA 273:721–723
American Diabetes Association (2003) Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:3333–3341
Chanta DS, Cunningham PM, Schweitzer ME (2005) MR imaging of the diabetic foot: diagnostic challenges. Radiol Clin North Am 43:747–759
Hagspiel KD, Yao L, Paul Shih MC et al (2006) Comparison of multistation MR angiography with integrated parallel acquisition technique versus conventional technique with a dedicated phased-array coil system in peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:263–269
Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Granville Batte W et al (1998) Osteomyelitis of the foot: relative importance of primary and secondary MR imaging signs. Radiology 207:625–632
Caputo GM, Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS et al (1994) Assessment and management of foot disease in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 331:854–860
Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG et al (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis 39:885–910
Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Wapner KL et al (1995) Osteomyelitis in feet of diabetics: clinical accuracy, surgical utility, and cost-effectiveness of MR imaging. Radiology 196:557–564
Vittorini E, Del Giudice E, Pizzoli A et al (2005) MRI versus scintigraphy with 99mTc-HMPAO-labelled granulocytes in the diagnosis of bone infection. Radiol Med 109:395–403
Ahmadi ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA et al (2006) Neuropathic arthropathy of the foot with and without superimposed osteomyelitis: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 238:622–631
Craig GC, Amin MB, Wu K et al (1997) Osteomyelitis of the diabetic foot. MR imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiology 203:849–855
Marcus CD, Ladam-Marcus VJ, Leone J et al (1996) MR imaging of osteomyelitis and neuropathic osteoarthropathy in the feet of diabetics. Radiographics 16:1337–1348
Brillet PY, Vayssairat M, Tassart M et al (2003) Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography as first-line preoperative imaging in high-risk patients with lower limb ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1139–1145
Ouwendijk R, Kock MCJM, van Dijk LC et al (2006) Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT Angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors. Radiology 241:603–608
Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM et al (2001) Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 36:170–177
Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R et al (2002) Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 224:55–61
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rozzanigo, U., Tagliani, A., Vittorini, E. et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic foot with suspected osteomyelitis. Radiol med 114, 121–132 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0337-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0337-7